Arbitrum vs Redbelly Scalability
Real-time TPS
Arbitrum TPS is 1,217X higher than Redbelly TPS
Max TPS (100 blocks)
Arbitrum max TPS is 98.14% lower than Redbelly max TPS
Max Theoretical TPS
Arbitrum max theoretical TPS is 94% lower than Redbelly max theoretical TPS
Transaction Volume
Arbitrum transaction volume is 1,219X higher than Redbelly transaction volume
Block Time
Arbitrum block time is 99.04% shorter than Redbelly block time
Finality
Arbitrum finality is 100% longer than Redbelly finality
Type
Arbitrum is a layer 2 blockchain, while Redbelly is a layer 1 blockchain
Launch Date
Arbitrum was launched 3 years before Redbelly
Arbitrum vs Redbelly Decentralization New
Nakamoto Coefficient
Arbitrum Nakamoto Coefficient is 1, while Redbelly has no data
Validators
Arbitrum has 1 validators, while Redbelly has no data
Stake
Arbitrum and Redbelly have no data
Consensus Mechanism
Arbitrum is Rollup (Optimistic), while Redbelly is PoS
Governance
Arbitrum on-chain governance is better than Redbelly council governance
Arbitrum vs Redbelly Real-Time TPS Chart
Loading Data
Other Comparisons
Arbitrum Comparisons
About Blockchains
About Arbitrum
Arbitrum serves as a Layer 2 scaling solution for Ethereum, leveraging rollups to significantly boost scalability and reduce transaction costs while maintaining robust security. It enables developers to execute EVM-compatible smart contracts with a substantially higher transaction throughput and lower fees compared to Ethereum's main chain, making it a compelling platform for decentralized application development.
About Redbelly
Redbelly Network is revolutionising asset tokenization, enabling businesses to tokenize assets like carbon credits and private equity on the blockchain.