Arbitrum vs Polygon Scalability
Real-time TPS
Arbitrum TPS is 8.36% lower than Polygon TPS
Max TPS (100 blocks)
Arbitrum max TPS is 3.17X higher than Polygon max TPS
Max Theoretical TPS
Arbitrum max theoretical TPS is 56X higher than Polygon max theoretical TPS
Transaction Volume
Arbitrum transaction volume is 8.36% lower than Polygon transaction volume
Block Time
Arbitrum block time is 88.28% shorter than Polygon block time
Finality
Arbitrum finality is 166X longer than Polygon finality
Type
Arbitrum is a layer 2 blockchain, while Polygon is a sidechain
Launch Date
Arbitrum was launched 1 year after Polygon
Arbitrum vs Polygon Decentralization New
Nakamoto Coefficient
Arbitrum Nakamoto Coefficient is 75% lower than Polygon Nakamoto Coefficient
Validators
Arbitrum has 99.03% fewer validators than Polygon
Stake
Arbitrum has no data, while Polygon stake is $819.1M
Consensus Mechanism
Arbitrum is Rollup (Optimistic), while Polygon is PoS
Governance
Arbitrum on-chain governance is better than Polygon off-chain governance
Arbitrum vs Polygon Real-Time TPS Chart
Loading Data
Other Comparisons
Arbitrum Comparisons
About Blockchains
About Arbitrum
Arbitrum serves as a Layer 2 scaling solution for Ethereum, leveraging rollups to significantly boost scalability and reduce transaction costs while maintaining robust security. It enables developers to execute EVM-compatible smart contracts with a substantially higher transaction throughput and lower fees compared to Ethereum's main chain, making it a compelling platform for decentralized application development.
About Polygon
Polygon, formerly Matic Network, is a blockchain platform designed to establish a multi-chain system compatible with Ethereum. It employs a proof-of-stake consensus mechanism similar to Ethereum for on-chain transactions, with its native token being POL. Functioning as a "layer two" or "sidechain" scaling solution alongside Ethereum, Polygon facilitates quicker transactions and lower fees. Its inception aimed to tackle Ethereum's major challenges, including high fees, subpar user experience, and limited transaction throughput, aspiring to create an "Ethereum's internet of blockchains" or a multi-chain ecosystem of Ethereum-compatible blockchains.