Compare Arbitrum vs Polygon
Open in ChatGPTArbitrum vs Polygon Scalability
Real-time TPS (1H)
Arbitrum TPS is 77.83% lower than Polygon TPS
Data from Chainspect
Max TPS (100 blocks)
Arbitrum max TPS is 3.79X higher than Polygon max TPS
Data from Chainspect
Max Theoretical TPS
Arbitrum max theoretical TPS is 1.83X higher than Polygon max theoretical TPS
Data from Chainspect
Transaction Volume (1H)
Arbitrum transaction volume is 77.82% lower than Polygon transaction volume
Data from Chainspect
Block Time (1H)
Arbitrum block time is 85.67% shorter than Polygon block time
Data from Chainspect
Finality
Arbitrum finality is 166X longer than Polygon finality
Data from Chainspect
Type
Arbitrum is a layer 2 blockchain, while Polygon is a sidechain
Data from Chainspect
Total Transactions (All time)
Arbitrum has 70.43% fewer total transactions than Polygon
Data from Chainspect
Launch Date
Arbitrum was launched 1 year after Polygon
Data from Chainspect
Arbitrum vs Polygon Decentralization
Nakamoto Coefficient
Arbitrum Nakamoto Coefficient is 75% lower than Polygon Nakamoto Coefficient
Data from Chainspect
Validators
Arbitrum has 99.02% fewer validators than Polygon
Data from Chainspect
Stake
Arbitrum has no data, while Polygon stake is $328.7M
Data from Chainspect
Consensus Mechanism
Arbitrum is Rollup (Optimistic), while Polygon is PoS
Data from Chainspect
Governance
Arbitrum on-chain governance is better than Polygon off-chain governance
Data from Chainspect
Arbitrum vs Polygon Developer Activity
Developers
Arbitrum has 1.36X more developers than Polygon
Data from Chainspect
Commits
Arbitrum has 3X more commits than Polygon
Data from Chainspect
Repos
Arbitrum has 23.35% fewer repos than Polygon
Data from Chainspect
Stars
Arbitrum has 1.13X more stars than Polygon
Data from Chainspect
Watchers
Arbitrum has 1.19X more watchers than Polygon
Data from Chainspect
Arbitrum vs Polygon Financials New
Chain Revenue
Arbitrum chain revenue is 78.47% lower than Polygon chain revenue
Data from Chainspect
Average Transaction Fee
Arbitrum average transaction fee is 8.26% lower than Polygon average transaction fee
Data from Chainspect
Market Cap
Arbitrum market cap is 25.08% lower than Polygon market cap
Data from Chainspect
FDV
Arbitrum FDV is 1.22X higher than Polygon FDV
Data from Chainspect
Market Cap / FDV
Arbitrum Market Cap to FDV ratio is 38.49% lower than Polygon Market Cap to FDV ratio
Data from Chainspect
Price
Arbitrum price is 1.3X higher than Polygon price
Data from Chainspect
Arbitrum vs Polygon Real-time TPS Chart
Loading Data
Other Comparisons
Arbitrum Comparisons
About Blockchains
About Arbitrum
Arbitrum serves as a Layer 2 scaling solution for Ethereum, leveraging rollups to significantly boost scalability and reduce transaction costs while maintaining robust security. It enables developers to execute EVM-compatible smart contracts with a substantially higher transaction throughput and lower fees compared to Ethereum's main chain, making it a compelling platform for decentralized application development.
About Polygon
Polygon, formerly Matic Network, is a blockchain platform designed to establish a multi-chain system compatible with Ethereum. It employs a proof-of-stake consensus mechanism similar to Ethereum for on-chain transactions, with its native token being POL. Functioning as a "layer two" or "sidechain" scaling solution alongside Ethereum, Polygon facilitates quicker transactions and lower fees. Its inception aimed to tackle Ethereum's major challenges, including high fees, subpar user experience, and limited transaction throughput, aspiring to create an "Ethereum's internet of blockchains" or a multi-chain ecosystem of Ethereum-compatible blockchains.