Arbitrum vs Polygon

Arbitrum vs Polygon Scalability

Real-time TPS (1H)

Arbitrum TPS is 52.8% lower than Polygon TPS

Arbitrum logo
20.37 tx/s
Polygon logo
43.16 tx/s

Data from Chainspect

Max TPS (100 blocks)

Arbitrum max TPS is 3.17X higher than Polygon max TPS

Arbitrum logo
1,358 tx/s
Polygon logo
429.1 tx/s

Data from Chainspect

Max Theoretical TPS

Arbitrum max theoretical TPS is 56X higher than Polygon max theoretical TPS

Arbitrum logo
40,000 tx/s
Polygon logo
714.3 tx/s

Data from Chainspect

Transaction Volume (1H)

Arbitrum transaction volume is 52.8% lower than Polygon transaction volume

Arbitrum logo
73.3K txns
Polygon logo
155K txns

Data from Chainspect

Block Time (1H)

Arbitrum block time is 88.26% shorter than Polygon block time

Arbitrum logo
0.25s
Polygon logo
2.13s

Data from Chainspect

Finality

Arbitrum finality is 166X longer than Polygon finality

Arbitrum logo
13m 48s
Polygon logo
5s

Data from Chainspect

Type

Arbitrum is a layer 2 blockchain, while Polygon is a sidechain

Arbitrum logo
Layer 2 blockchain
Polygon logo
Sidechain

Data from Chainspect

New

Total Transactions

Arbitrum has 72.51% fewer total transactions than Polygon

Arbitrum logo
1.57B txns
Polygon logo
5.7B txns

Data from Chainspect

Launch Date

Arbitrum was launched 1 year after Polygon

Arbitrum logo
Aug 31, 2021
Polygon logo
May 30, 2020

Data from Chainspect

Arbitrum vs Polygon Decentralization

Nakamoto Coefficient

Arbitrum Nakamoto Coefficient is 80% lower than Polygon Nakamoto Coefficient

Arbitrum logo
1
Polygon logo
5

Data from Chainspect

Validators

Arbitrum has 99.03% fewer validators than Polygon

Arbitrum logo
1
Polygon logo
104

Data from Chainspect

Stake

Arbitrum has no data, while Polygon stake is $824.9M

Arbitrum logo
—
Polygon logo
$824.9M

Data from Chainspect

Consensus Mechanism

Arbitrum is Rollup (Optimistic), while Polygon is PoS

Arbitrum logo
Rollup (Optimistic)
Polygon logo
Proof of Stake (PoS)

Data from Chainspect

Governance

Arbitrum on-chain governance is better than Polygon off-chain governance

Arbitrum logo
On-chain
Polygon logo
Off-chain

Data from Chainspect

Arbitrum vs Polygon Developer Activity New

Developers

Arbitrum has 1.4X more developers than Polygon

Arbitrum logo
2,318
Polygon logo
1,657

Data from Chainspect

Repos

Arbitrum has 14.86% fewer repos than Polygon

Arbitrum logo
126
Polygon logo
148

Data from Chainspect

Commits

Arbitrum has 2.99X more commits than Polygon

Arbitrum logo
185,188
Polygon logo
62,011

Data from Chainspect

Stars

Arbitrum has 1.12X more stars than Polygon

Arbitrum logo
10,338
Polygon logo
9,212

Data from Chainspect

Watchers

Arbitrum has 8.48% fewer watchers than Polygon

Arbitrum logo
1,714
Polygon logo
1,873

Data from Chainspect

Arbitrum vs Polygon Real-Time TPS Chart

Loading Data

Other Comparisons

About Blockchains

About Arbitrum

Arbitrum serves as a Layer 2 scaling solution for Ethereum, leveraging rollups to significantly boost scalability and reduce transaction costs while maintaining robust security. It enables developers to execute EVM-compatible smart contracts with a substantially higher transaction throughput and lower fees compared to Ethereum's main chain, making it a compelling platform for decentralized application development.

About Polygon

Polygon, formerly Matic Network, is a blockchain platform designed to establish a multi-chain system compatible with Ethereum. It employs a proof-of-stake consensus mechanism similar to Ethereum for on-chain transactions, with its native token being POL. Functioning as a "layer two" or "sidechain" scaling solution alongside Ethereum, Polygon facilitates quicker transactions and lower fees. Its inception aimed to tackle Ethereum's major challenges, including high fees, subpar user experience, and limited transaction throughput, aspiring to create an "Ethereum's internet of blockchains" or a multi-chain ecosystem of Ethereum-compatible blockchains.

Blockchains Socials

Arbitrum Socials

Polygon Socials