Real-time TPS
Arbitrum TPS is 98.78% less than Solana TPS
Max TPS (100 blocks)
Arbitrum max TPS is 62% less than Solana max TPS
Max Theoretical TPS
Arbitrum max theoretical TPS is 38.46% less than Solana max theoretical TPS
Total Transactions
Arbitrum total txns is 98.78% less than Solana total txns
Block Time
Arbitrum block time is 35.82% less than Solana block time
Finality
Arbitrum finality is 75X more than Solana finality
Nakamoto Coefficient
Arbitrum and Solana nakamoto coefficient are both coming soon
Active Addresses
Arbitrum and Solana active addresses are both coming soon
Governance
Arbitrum on-chain governance is better than Solana off-chain governance
Type
Arbitrum is a layer 2 blockchain, while Solana is a layer 1 blockchain
Launch Date
Arbitrum was launched 1 year after Solana
Arbitrum vs Solana Real-Time TPS Chart
Loading Data
Other Comparisons
Arbitrum Comparisons
About Blockchains
About Arbitrum
Arbitrum serves as a Layer 2 scaling solution for Ethereum, leveraging rollups to significantly boost scalability and reduce transaction costs while maintaining robust security. It enables developers to execute EVM-compatible smart contracts with a substantially higher transaction throughput and lower fees compared to Ethereum's main chain, making it a compelling platform for decentralized application development.
About Solana
Solana stands out as a high-performance blockchain, celebrated for its scalability, speed, and minimal transaction expenses. Featuring a distinctive consensus mechanism dubbed Proof of History (PoH), Solana achieves remarkable scalability and efficiency. Tailored to accommodate dApps, it excels in processing a vast number of transactions swiftly, thereby slashing processing durations and fees. These attributes make it a compelling platform for developers within the cryptocurrency realm.