Algorand 
Aptos 
Avalanche 
Base 
Bitcoin 
BNB Chain 
BSV Blockchain 
Cardano 
Cronos 
eCash 
Ethereum 
Etherlink 
Fogo 
Hedera 
ICP 
IoTeX 
Kaia 
Keeta Mainnet 
Keeta Testnet 
Kusama 
Moonbeam 
MultiversX 
NEAR 
Optimism 
Polkadot 
Polygon 
Redbelly 
Sei 
Somnia 
Sonic 
Starknet 
Stellar 
Sui 
Tezos 
Tezos Ecosystem 
TON 
TRON 
Wanchain 
Waterfall 
Abstract 
Aurora 
Avail 
B² Network 
Babylon 
Boba Network 
Chromia 
Cosmos 
Flare 
Gravity 
Hyperliquid 
Immutable X 
Immutable zkEVM 
Injective 
Ink 
Katana 
Kava 
Lens Chain 
Linea 
Lisk 
Manta Network 
Mantle 
MegaETH 
Metis 
Monad 
N1 
Neo 
Noble 
Particle 
Plume 
Quai Network 
RISE 
Ronin 
Skale 
Solayer 
Soon 
Sophon 
Supra 
Taiko 
Trac Network 
Unichain 
UPCX 
VeChain 
XDC Network 
XRP Ledger Compare Arbitrum vs Solana
Open in ChatGPTArbitrum vs Solana Scalability
Real-time TPS (1H)
Arbitrum TPS is 97.95% lower than Solana TPS
Data from Chainspect
Max TPS (100 blocks)
Arbitrum max TPS is 67.6% lower than Solana max TPS
Data from Chainspect
Max Theoretical TPS
Arbitrum max theoretical TPS is 90.62% lower than Solana max theoretical TPS
Data from Chainspect
Transaction Volume (1H)
Arbitrum transaction volume is 97.95% lower than Solana transaction volume
Data from Chainspect
Block Time (1H)
Arbitrum block time is 37.56% shorter than Solana block time
Data from Chainspect
Finality
Arbitrum finality is 65X longer than Solana finality
Data from Chainspect
Type
Arbitrum is a layer 2 blockchain, while Solana is a layer 1 blockchain
Data from Chainspect
Total Transactions (All time)
Arbitrum has 98.05% fewer total transactions than Solana
Data from Chainspect
Launch Date
Arbitrum was launched 1 year after Solana
Data from Chainspect
Arbitrum vs Solana Decentralization
Nakamoto Coefficient
Arbitrum Nakamoto Coefficient is 94.73% lower than Solana Nakamoto Coefficient
Data from Chainspect
Validators
Arbitrum has 99.86% fewer validators than Solana
Data from Chainspect
Stake
Arbitrum has no data, while Solana stake is $30.61B
Data from Chainspect
Consensus Mechanism
Arbitrum is Rollup (Optimistic), while Solana is PoS
Data from Chainspect
Governance
Arbitrum on-chain governance is better than Solana off-chain governance
Data from Chainspect
Arbitrum vs Solana Developer Activity
Developers
Arbitrum has 77.35% fewer developers than Solana
Data from Chainspect
Commits
Arbitrum has 2.13X more commits than Solana
Data from Chainspect
Repos
Arbitrum has 18.86% fewer repos than Solana
Data from Chainspect
Stars
Arbitrum has 73.93% fewer stars than Solana
Data from Chainspect
Watchers
Arbitrum has 2.72X more watchers than Solana
Data from Chainspect
Arbitrum vs Solana Financials New
Chain Revenue
Arbitrum chain revenue is 94.86% lower than Solana chain revenue
Data from Chainspect
Average Transaction Fee
Arbitrum average transaction fee is 2.54X higher than Solana average transaction fee
Data from Chainspect
Market Cap
Arbitrum market cap is 98.86% lower than Solana market cap
Data from Chainspect
FDV
Arbitrum FDV is 98.35% lower than Solana FDV
Data from Chainspect
Market Cap / FDV
Arbitrum Market Cap to FDV ratio is 31.04% lower than Solana Market Cap to FDV ratio
Data from Chainspect
Price
Arbitrum price is 99.89% lower than Solana price
Data from Chainspect
Arbitrum vs Solana Real-time TPS Chart
Other Comparisons
Arbitrum Comparisons
About Blockchains
About Arbitrum
Arbitrum serves as a Layer 2 scaling solution for Ethereum, leveraging rollups to significantly boost scalability and reduce transaction costs while maintaining robust security. It enables developers to execute EVM-compatible smart contracts with a substantially higher transaction throughput and lower fees compared to Ethereum's main chain, making it a compelling platform for decentralized application development.
About Solana
Solana stands out as a high-performance blockchain, celebrated for its scalability, speed, and minimal transaction expenses. Featuring a distinctive consensus mechanism dubbed Proof of History (PoH), Solana achieves remarkable scalability and efficiency. Tailored to accommodate dApps, it excels in processing a vast number of transactions swiftly, thereby slashing processing durations and fees. These attributes make it a compelling platform for developers within the cryptocurrency realm.