Solana vs Polygon Scalability
Real-time TPS
Solana TPS is 28X more than Polygon TPS
Max TPS (100 blocks)
Solana max TPS is 6.78X more than Polygon max TPS
Max Theoretical TPS
Solana max theoretical TPS is 91X more than Polygon max theoretical TPS
Transaction Volume
Solana transaction volume is 28X more than Polygon transaction volume
Block Time
Solana block time is 81.52% less than Polygon block time
Finality
Solana finality is 2.56X more than Polygon finality
Type
Solana is a layer 1 blockchain, while Polygon is a sidechain
Launch Date
Solana was launched 2 months before Polygon
Solana vs Polygon Decentralization New
Nakamoto Coefficient
Solana nakamoto coefficient is 5.25X more than Polygon nakamoto coefficient
Validators
Solana has 9.98X more validators than Polygon
Stake
Solana stake is 401.4M SOL, while Polygon stake is 3.515B MATIC
Consensus Mechanism
Solana and Polygon are both PoS
Governance
Solana and Polygon governance are both off-chain
Solana vs Polygon Real-Time TPS Chart
Loading Data
Other Comparisons
Solana Comparisons
About Blockchains
About Solana
Solana stands out as a high-performance blockchain, celebrated for its scalability, speed, and minimal transaction expenses. Featuring a distinctive consensus mechanism dubbed Proof of History (PoH), Solana achieves remarkable scalability and efficiency. Tailored to accommodate dApps, it excels in processing a vast number of transactions swiftly, thereby slashing processing durations and fees. These attributes make it a compelling platform for developers within the cryptocurrency realm.
About Polygon
Polygon, formerly Matic Network, is a blockchain platform designed to establish a multi-chain system compatible with Ethereum. It employs a proof-of-stake consensus mechanism similar to Ethereum for on-chain transactions, with its native token being MATIC. Functioning as a "layer two" or "sidechain" scaling solution alongside Ethereum, Polygon facilitates quicker transactions and lower fees. Its inception aimed to tackle Ethereum's major challenges, including high fees, subpar user experience, and limited transaction throughput, aspiring to create an "Ethereum's internet of blockchains" or a multi-chain ecosystem of Ethereum-compatible blockchains.