Compare Polygon vs Avalanche
Open in ChatGPTPolygon vs Avalanche Scalability
Real-time TPS (1H)
Polygon TPS is 2.82X higher than Avalanche TPS
Data from Chainspect
Max TPS (100 blocks)
Polygon max TPS is 2.23X higher than Avalanche max TPS
Data from Chainspect
Max Theoretical TPS
Polygon max theoretical TPS is 2.8X higher than Avalanche max theoretical TPS
Data from Chainspect
Transaction Volume (1H)
Polygon transaction volume is 2.82X higher than Avalanche transaction volume
Data from Chainspect
Block Time (1H)
Polygon block time is 1.38X longer than Avalanche block time
Data from Chainspect
Finality
Polygon finality is 2.5X longer than Avalanche finality
Data from Chainspect
Type
Polygon is a sidechain, while Avalanche is a layer 1 blockchain
Data from Chainspect
Total Transactions (All time)
Polygon has 5.58X more total transactions than Avalanche
Data from Chainspect
Launch Date
Polygon was launched 4 months before Avalanche
Data from Chainspect
Polygon vs Avalanche Decentralization
Nakamoto Coefficient
Polygon Nakamoto Coefficient is 85.18% lower than Avalanche Nakamoto Coefficient
Data from Chainspect
Validators
Polygon has 84.11% fewer validators than Avalanche
Data from Chainspect
Stake
Polygon stake is 81.84% lower than Avalanche stake
Data from Chainspect
Consensus Mechanism
Polygon and Avalanche are both PoS
Data from Chainspect
Governance
Polygon off-chain governance is worse than Avalanche on-chain governance
Data from Chainspect
Polygon vs Avalanche Developer Activity
Developers
Polygon has 2.2X more developers than Avalanche
Data from Chainspect
Commits
Polygon has 17.39% fewer commits than Avalanche
Data from Chainspect
Repos
Polygon has 1.46X more repos than Avalanche
Data from Chainspect
Stars
Polygon has 1.4X more stars than Avalanche
Data from Chainspect
Watchers
Polygon has 1.35X more watchers than Avalanche
Data from Chainspect
Polygon vs Avalanche Financials New
Chain Revenue
Polygon chain revenue is 4.23X higher than Avalanche chain revenue
Data from Chainspect
Average Transaction Fee
Polygon average transaction fee is 1.34X higher than Avalanche average transaction fee
Data from Chainspect
Market Cap
Polygon market cap is 71.84% lower than Avalanche market cap
Data from Chainspect
FDV
Polygon FDV is 83.01% lower than Avalanche FDV
Data from Chainspect
Market Cap / FDV
Polygon Market Cap to FDV ratio is 1.66X higher than Avalanche Market Cap to FDV ratio
Data from Chainspect
Price
Polygon price is 98.85% lower than Avalanche price
Data from Chainspect
Polygon vs Avalanche Real-time TPS Chart
Other Comparisons
Polygon Comparisons
About Blockchains
About Polygon
Polygon, formerly Matic Network, is a blockchain platform designed to establish a multi-chain system compatible with Ethereum. It employs a proof-of-stake consensus mechanism similar to Ethereum for on-chain transactions, with its native token being POL. Functioning as a "layer two" or "sidechain" scaling solution alongside Ethereum, Polygon facilitates quicker transactions and lower fees. Its inception aimed to tackle Ethereum's major challenges, including high fees, subpar user experience, and limited transaction throughput, aspiring to create an "Ethereum's internet of blockchains" or a multi-chain ecosystem of Ethereum-compatible blockchains.
About Avalanche
Avalanche emerges as a rapid, scalable blockchain platform facilitating the seamless creation and deployment of dApps. Distinguished by its unique consensus mechanism, it's particularly good for DeFi applications, allowing high throughput and nearly instant finality. Its architecture allows for a network of interconnected blockchains, each safeguarded by dynamic subsets of validators, ensuring scalability while maintaining speed, reliability, and security.