Compare Polygon vs Arbitrum
Open in ChatGPTPolygon vs Arbitrum Scalability
Real-time TPS (1H)
Polygon TPS is 3.96X higher than Arbitrum TPS
Data from Chainspect
Max TPS (100 blocks)
Polygon max TPS is 73.59% lower than Arbitrum max TPS
Data from Chainspect
Max Theoretical TPS
Polygon max theoretical TPS is 45.31% lower than Arbitrum max theoretical TPS
Data from Chainspect
Transaction Volume (1H)
Polygon transaction volume is 3.96X higher than Arbitrum transaction volume
Data from Chainspect
Block Time (1H)
Polygon block time is 7X longer than Arbitrum block time
Data from Chainspect
Finality
Polygon finality is 99.39% shorter than Arbitrum finality
Data from Chainspect
Type
Polygon is a sidechain, while Arbitrum is a layer 2 blockchain
Data from Chainspect
Total Transactions (All time)
Polygon has 3.4X more total transactions than Arbitrum
Data from Chainspect
Launch Date
Polygon was launched 1 year before Arbitrum
Data from Chainspect
Polygon vs Arbitrum Decentralization
Nakamoto Coefficient
Polygon Nakamoto Coefficient is 4X higher than Arbitrum Nakamoto Coefficient
Data from Chainspect
Validators
Polygon has 105X more validators than Arbitrum
Data from Chainspect
Stake
Polygon stake is $326.8M, while Arbitrum has no data
Data from Chainspect
Consensus Mechanism
Polygon is PoS, while Arbitrum is Rollup (Optimistic)
Data from Chainspect
Governance
Polygon off-chain governance is worse than Arbitrum on-chain governance
Data from Chainspect
Polygon vs Arbitrum Developer Activity
Developers
Polygon has 26.18% fewer developers than Arbitrum
Data from Chainspect
Commits
Polygon has 66.64% fewer commits than Arbitrum
Data from Chainspect
Repos
Polygon has 1.3X more repos than Arbitrum
Data from Chainspect
Stars
Polygon has 11.7% fewer stars than Arbitrum
Data from Chainspect
Watchers
Polygon has 15.92% fewer watchers than Arbitrum
Data from Chainspect
Polygon vs Arbitrum Financials New
Chain Revenue
Polygon chain revenue is 6.78X higher than Arbitrum chain revenue
Data from Chainspect
Average Transaction Fee
Polygon average transaction fee is 1.76X higher than Arbitrum average transaction fee
Data from Chainspect
Market Cap
Polygon market cap is 1.66X higher than Arbitrum market cap
Data from Chainspect
FDV
Polygon FDV is 1.04X higher than Arbitrum FDV
Data from Chainspect
Market Cap / FDV
Polygon Market Cap to FDV ratio is 1.6X higher than Arbitrum Market Cap to FDV ratio
Data from Chainspect
Price
Polygon price is 2.64% lower than Arbitrum price
Data from Chainspect
Polygon vs Arbitrum Real-time TPS Chart
Other Comparisons
Polygon Comparisons
About Blockchains
About Polygon
Polygon, formerly Matic Network, is a blockchain platform designed to establish a multi-chain system compatible with Ethereum. It employs a proof-of-stake consensus mechanism similar to Ethereum for on-chain transactions, with its native token being POL. Functioning as a "layer two" or "sidechain" scaling solution alongside Ethereum, Polygon facilitates quicker transactions and lower fees. Its inception aimed to tackle Ethereum's major challenges, including high fees, subpar user experience, and limited transaction throughput, aspiring to create an "Ethereum's internet of blockchains" or a multi-chain ecosystem of Ethereum-compatible blockchains.
About Arbitrum
Arbitrum serves as a Layer 2 scaling solution for Ethereum, leveraging rollups to significantly boost scalability and reduce transaction costs while maintaining robust security. It enables developers to execute EVM-compatible smart contracts with a substantially higher transaction throughput and lower fees compared to Ethereum's main chain, making it a compelling platform for decentralized application development.