Polygon vs Arbitrum

Polygon vs Arbitrum Scalability

Real-time TPS (1H)

Polygon TPS is 1.49X higher than Arbitrum TPS

Polygon logo
46.78 tx/s
Arbitrum logo
31.48 tx/s

Data from Chainspect

Max TPS (100 blocks)

Polygon max TPS is 68.41% lower than Arbitrum max TPS

Polygon logo
429.1 tx/s
Arbitrum logo
1,358 tx/s

Data from Chainspect

Max Theoretical TPS

Polygon max theoretical TPS is 98.21% lower than Arbitrum max theoretical TPS

Polygon logo
714.3 tx/s
Arbitrum logo
40,000 tx/s

Data from Chainspect

Transaction Volume (1H)

Polygon transaction volume is 1.49X higher than Arbitrum transaction volume

Polygon logo
168K txns
Arbitrum logo
113K txns

Data from Chainspect

Block Time (1H)

Polygon block time is 8.51X longer than Arbitrum block time

Polygon logo
2.12s
Arbitrum logo
0.25s

Data from Chainspect

Finality

Polygon finality is 99.39% shorter than Arbitrum finality

Polygon logo
5s
Arbitrum logo
13m 48s

Data from Chainspect

Type

Polygon is a sidechain, while Arbitrum is a layer 2 blockchain

Polygon logo
Sidechain
Arbitrum logo
Layer 2 blockchain

Data from Chainspect

New

Total Transactions

Polygon has 3.64X more total transactions than Arbitrum

Polygon logo
5.7B txns
Arbitrum logo
1.57B txns

Data from Chainspect

Launch Date

Polygon was launched 1 year before Arbitrum

Polygon logo
May 30, 2020
Arbitrum logo
Aug 31, 2021

Data from Chainspect

Polygon vs Arbitrum Decentralization

Nakamoto Coefficient

Polygon Nakamoto Coefficient is 5X higher than Arbitrum Nakamoto Coefficient

Polygon logo
5
Arbitrum logo
1

Data from Chainspect

Validators

Polygon has 104X more validators than Arbitrum

Polygon logo
104
Arbitrum logo
1

Data from Chainspect

Stake

Polygon stake is $824.9M, while Arbitrum has no data

Polygon logo
$824.9M
Arbitrum logo
—

Data from Chainspect

Consensus Mechanism

Polygon is PoS, while Arbitrum is Rollup (Optimistic)

Polygon logo
Proof of Stake (PoS)
Arbitrum logo
Rollup (Optimistic)

Data from Chainspect

Governance

Polygon off-chain governance is worse than Arbitrum on-chain governance

Polygon logo
Off-chain
Arbitrum logo
On-chain

Data from Chainspect

Polygon vs Arbitrum Developer Activity New

Developers

Polygon has 28.48% fewer developers than Arbitrum

Polygon logo
1,657
Arbitrum logo
2,317

Data from Chainspect

Repos

Polygon has 1.17X more repos than Arbitrum

Polygon logo
148
Arbitrum logo
126

Data from Chainspect

Commits

Polygon has 66.52% fewer commits than Arbitrum

Polygon logo
61,981
Arbitrum logo
185,174

Data from Chainspect

Stars

Polygon has 10.88% fewer stars than Arbitrum

Polygon logo
9,214
Arbitrum logo
10,340

Data from Chainspect

Watchers

Polygon has 1.09X more watchers than Arbitrum

Polygon logo
1,873
Arbitrum logo
1,714

Data from Chainspect

Polygon vs Arbitrum Real-Time TPS Chart

Loading Data

Other Comparisons

About Blockchains

About Polygon

Polygon, formerly Matic Network, is a blockchain platform designed to establish a multi-chain system compatible with Ethereum. It employs a proof-of-stake consensus mechanism similar to Ethereum for on-chain transactions, with its native token being POL. Functioning as a "layer two" or "sidechain" scaling solution alongside Ethereum, Polygon facilitates quicker transactions and lower fees. Its inception aimed to tackle Ethereum's major challenges, including high fees, subpar user experience, and limited transaction throughput, aspiring to create an "Ethereum's internet of blockchains" or a multi-chain ecosystem of Ethereum-compatible blockchains.

About Arbitrum

Arbitrum serves as a Layer 2 scaling solution for Ethereum, leveraging rollups to significantly boost scalability and reduce transaction costs while maintaining robust security. It enables developers to execute EVM-compatible smart contracts with a substantially higher transaction throughput and lower fees compared to Ethereum's main chain, making it a compelling platform for decentralized application development.

Blockchains Socials

Polygon Socials

Arbitrum Socials