Polygon vs Arbitrum Scalability
Real-time TPS
Polygon TPS is 1.29X higher than Arbitrum TPS
Max TPS (100 blocks)
Polygon max TPS is 68.41% lower than Arbitrum max TPS
Max Theoretical TPS
Polygon max theoretical TPS is 98.21% lower than Arbitrum max theoretical TPS
Transaction Volume
Polygon transaction volume is 1.29X higher than Arbitrum transaction volume
Block Time
Polygon block time is 8.51X longer than Arbitrum block time
Finality
Polygon finality is 99.39% shorter than Arbitrum finality
Type
Polygon is a sidechain, while Arbitrum is a layer 2 blockchain
Launch Date
Polygon was launched 1 year before Arbitrum
Polygon vs Arbitrum Decentralization New
Nakamoto Coefficient
Polygon Nakamoto Coefficient is 4X higher than Arbitrum Nakamoto Coefficient
Validators
Polygon has 105X more validators than Arbitrum
Stake
Polygon stake is $809.8M, while Arbitrum has no data
Consensus Mechanism
Polygon is PoS, while Arbitrum is Rollup (Optimistic)
Governance
Polygon off-chain governance is worse than Arbitrum on-chain governance
Polygon vs Arbitrum Real-Time TPS Chart
Loading Data
Other Comparisons
Polygon Comparisons
About Blockchains
About Polygon
Polygon, formerly Matic Network, is a blockchain platform designed to establish a multi-chain system compatible with Ethereum. It employs a proof-of-stake consensus mechanism similar to Ethereum for on-chain transactions, with its native token being POL. Functioning as a "layer two" or "sidechain" scaling solution alongside Ethereum, Polygon facilitates quicker transactions and lower fees. Its inception aimed to tackle Ethereum's major challenges, including high fees, subpar user experience, and limited transaction throughput, aspiring to create an "Ethereum's internet of blockchains" or a multi-chain ecosystem of Ethereum-compatible blockchains.
About Arbitrum
Arbitrum serves as a Layer 2 scaling solution for Ethereum, leveraging rollups to significantly boost scalability and reduce transaction costs while maintaining robust security. It enables developers to execute EVM-compatible smart contracts with a substantially higher transaction throughput and lower fees compared to Ethereum's main chain, making it a compelling platform for decentralized application development.