Compare Arbitrum vs Polkadot Ecosystem
Arbitrum vs Polkadot Ecosystem Scalability
Real-time TPS (1H)
Arbitrum TPS is 6.38X higher than Polkadot Ecosystem TPS
Data from Chainspect
Max TPS (100 blocks)
Arbitrum max TPS is 3.03X higher than Polkadot Ecosystem max TPS
Data from Chainspect
Max Theoretical TPS
Arbitrum max theoretical TPS is 93.9% lower than Polkadot Ecosystem max theoretical TPS
Data from Chainspect
Transaction Volume (1H)
Arbitrum transaction volume is 6.38X higher than Polkadot Ecosystem transaction volume
Data from Chainspect
Block Time (1H)
Arbitrum block time is 95.88% shorter than Polkadot Ecosystem block time
Data from Chainspect
Finality
Arbitrum finality is 28X longer than Polkadot Ecosystem finality
Data from Chainspect
Type
Arbitrum is a layer 2 blockchain, while Polkadot Ecosystem is a blockchain ecosystem
Data from Chainspect
Total Transactions
Arbitrum has 2.55X more total transactions than Polkadot Ecosystem
Data from Chainspect
Launch Date
Arbitrum was launched 1 year after Polkadot Ecosystem
Data from Chainspect
Arbitrum vs Polkadot Ecosystem Decentralization
Nakamoto Coefficient
Arbitrum Nakamoto Coefficient is 99.43% lower than Polkadot Ecosystem Nakamoto Coefficient
Data from Chainspect
Validators
Arbitrum has 99.83% fewer validators than Polkadot Ecosystem
Data from Chainspect
Stake
Arbitrum has no data, while Polkadot Ecosystem stake is $2.287B
Data from Chainspect
Consensus Mechanism
Arbitrum is Rollup (Optimistic), while Polkadot Ecosystem is Nominated Proof of Stake
Data from Chainspect
Governance
Arbitrum and Polkadot Ecosystem governance are both on-chain
Data from Chainspect
Arbitrum vs Polkadot Ecosystem Developer Activity
Developers
Arbitrum has 73.49% fewer developers than Polkadot Ecosystem
Data from Chainspect
Repos
Arbitrum has 72.35% fewer repos than Polkadot Ecosystem
Data from Chainspect
Commits
Arbitrum has 72.1% fewer commits than Polkadot Ecosystem
Data from Chainspect
Stars
Arbitrum has 69.16% fewer stars than Polkadot Ecosystem
Data from Chainspect
Watchers
Arbitrum has 67.65% fewer watchers than Polkadot Ecosystem
Data from Chainspect
Arbitrum vs Polkadot Ecosystem Financials New
Chain Revenue
Arbitrum chain revenue is $53.96K, while Polkadot Ecosystem has no data
Data from Chainspect
Average Transaction Fee
Arbitrum average transaction fee is $0.02095, while Polkadot Ecosystem has no data
Data from Chainspect
Price
Arbitrum price is 91.49% lower than Polkadot Ecosystem price
Data from Chainspect
Market Cap
Arbitrum market cap is 71.35% lower than Polkadot Ecosystem market cap
Data from Chainspect
Arbitrum vs Polkadot Ecosystem Real-Time TPS Chart
Loading Data
Other Comparisons
Arbitrum Comparisons
About Blockchains
About Arbitrum
Arbitrum serves as a Layer 2 scaling solution for Ethereum, leveraging rollups to significantly boost scalability and reduce transaction costs while maintaining robust security. It enables developers to execute EVM-compatible smart contracts with a substantially higher transaction throughput and lower fees compared to Ethereum's main chain, making it a compelling platform for decentralized application development.
About Polkadot Ecosystem
Polkadot stands out among other blockchain projects for its focus on enhancing the foundational infrastructure of dApps. It aims to enable interoperability between blockchain ecosystems, facilitating seamless communication without intermediaries. Functioning as a "network of networks," Polkadot utilizes parachains — specialized blockchains with unique functionalities and tokens — to enable interaction between diverse blockchain architectures. Powered by the nominated proof-of-stake (PoS) consensus algorithm and drawing inspiration from the Ouroboros protocol, Polkadot offers a robust framework for building interconnected and scalable decentralized systems.