Real-time TPS
Solana TPS is 39X more than Arbitrum TPS
Max TPS (100 blocks)
Solana max TPS is 2.63X more than Arbitrum max TPS
Max Theoretical TPS
Solana max theoretical TPS is 1.63X more than Arbitrum max theoretical TPS
Transaction Volume
Solana transaction volume is 39X more than Arbitrum transaction volume
Block Time
Solana block time is 1.57X more than Arbitrum block time
Finality
Solana finality is 98.66% less than Arbitrum finality
Nakamoto Coefficient
Solana and Arbitrum nakamoto coefficient are both coming soon
Active Addresses
Solana and Arbitrum active addresses are both coming soon
Governance
Solana off-chain governance is worse than Arbitrum on-chain governance
Type
Solana is a layer 1 blockchain, while Arbitrum is a layer 2 blockchain
Launch Date
Solana was launched 1 year before Arbitrum
Solana vs Arbitrum Real-Time TPS Chart
Loading Data
Other Comparisons
Solana Comparisons
About Blockchains
About Solana
Solana stands out as a high-performance blockchain, celebrated for its scalability, speed, and minimal transaction expenses. Featuring a distinctive consensus mechanism dubbed Proof of History (PoH), Solana achieves remarkable scalability and efficiency. Tailored to accommodate dApps, it excels in processing a vast number of transactions swiftly, thereby slashing processing durations and fees. These attributes make it a compelling platform for developers within the cryptocurrency realm.
About Arbitrum
Arbitrum serves as a Layer 2 scaling solution for Ethereum, leveraging rollups to significantly boost scalability and reduce transaction costs while maintaining robust security. It enables developers to execute EVM-compatible smart contracts with a substantially higher transaction throughput and lower fees compared to Ethereum's main chain, making it a compelling platform for decentralized application development.