Redbelly vs Polygon Scalability
Real-time TPS
Redbelly TPS is 99.96% lower than Polygon TPS
Max TPS (100 blocks)
Redbelly max TPS is 170X higher than Polygon max TPS
Max Theoretical TPS
Redbelly max theoretical TPS is 934X higher than Polygon max theoretical TPS
Transaction Volume
Redbelly transaction volume is 99.96% lower than Polygon transaction volume
Block Time
Redbelly block time is 38X longer than Polygon block time
Finality
Redbelly finality is 100% shorter than Polygon finality
Type
Redbelly is a layer 1 blockchain, while Polygon is a sidechain
Launch Date
Redbelly was launched 5 years after Polygon
Redbelly vs Polygon Decentralization New
Nakamoto Coefficient
Redbelly has no data, while Polygon Nakamoto Coefficient is 4
Validators
Redbelly has no data, while Polygon has 103 validators
Stake
Redbelly has no data, while Polygon stake is 3.505B MATIC
Consensus Mechanism
Redbelly and Polygon are both PoS
Governance
Redbelly council governance is worse than Polygon off-chain governance
Redbelly vs Polygon Real-Time TPS Chart
Loading Data
Other Comparisons
Redbelly Comparisons
About Blockchains
About Redbelly
Redbelly Network is revolutionising asset tokenization, enabling businesses to tokenize assets like carbon credits and private equity on the blockchain.
About Polygon
Polygon, formerly Matic Network, is a blockchain platform designed to establish a multi-chain system compatible with Ethereum. It employs a proof-of-stake consensus mechanism similar to Ethereum for on-chain transactions, with its native token being MATIC. Functioning as a "layer two" or "sidechain" scaling solution alongside Ethereum, Polygon facilitates quicker transactions and lower fees. Its inception aimed to tackle Ethereum's major challenges, including high fees, subpar user experience, and limited transaction throughput, aspiring to create an "Ethereum's internet of blockchains" or a multi-chain ecosystem of Ethereum-compatible blockchains.