Redbelly vs Arbitrum Scalability
Real-time TPS
Redbelly TPS is 99.94% lower than Arbitrum TPS
Max TPS (100 blocks)
Redbelly max TPS is 54X higher than Arbitrum max TPS
Max Theoretical TPS
Redbelly max theoretical TPS is 17X higher than Arbitrum max theoretical TPS
Transaction Volume
Redbelly transaction volume is 99.94% lower than Arbitrum transaction volume
Block Time
Redbelly block time is 200X longer than Arbitrum block time
Finality
Redbelly finality is 100% shorter than Arbitrum finality
Type
Redbelly is a layer 1 blockchain, while Arbitrum is a layer 2 blockchain
Launch Date
Redbelly was launched 3 years after Arbitrum
Redbelly vs Arbitrum Decentralization New
Nakamoto Coefficient
Redbelly has no data, while Arbitrum Nakamoto Coefficient is 1
Validators
Redbelly has no data, while Arbitrum has 1 validators
Stake
Redbelly and Arbitrum have no data
Consensus Mechanism
Redbelly is PoS, while Arbitrum is Rollup (Optimistic)
Governance
Redbelly council governance is worse than Arbitrum on-chain governance
Redbelly vs Arbitrum Real-Time TPS Chart
Loading Data
Other Comparisons
Redbelly Comparisons
About Blockchains
About Redbelly
Redbelly Network is revolutionising asset tokenization, enabling businesses to tokenize assets like carbon credits and private equity on the blockchain.
About Arbitrum
Arbitrum serves as a Layer 2 scaling solution for Ethereum, leveraging rollups to significantly boost scalability and reduce transaction costs while maintaining robust security. It enables developers to execute EVM-compatible smart contracts with a substantially higher transaction throughput and lower fees compared to Ethereum's main chain, making it a compelling platform for decentralized application development.