Moonbeam vs Starknet Scalability
Real-time TPS
Moonbeam TPS is 45.68% lower than Starknet TPS
Max TPS (100 blocks)
Moonbeam max TPS is 92.32% lower than Starknet max TPS
Max Theoretical TPS
Moonbeam max theoretical TPS is 94.11% lower than Starknet max theoretical TPS
Transaction Volume
Moonbeam transaction volume is 45.67% lower than Starknet transaction volume
Block Time
Moonbeam block time is 24.57% shorter than Starknet block time
Finality
Moonbeam finality is 99.62% shorter than Starknet finality
Type
Moonbeam is a parachain, while Starknet is a layer 2 blockchain
Launch Date
Moonbeam was launched 2 months after Starknet
Moonbeam vs Starknet Decentralization New
Nakamoto Coefficient
Moonbeam Nakamoto Coefficient is 174X higher than Starknet Nakamoto Coefficient
Validators
Moonbeam has 600X more validators than Starknet
Stake
Moonbeam stake is $2.947B, while Starknet has no data
Consensus Mechanism
Moonbeam is Nominated Proof of Stake, while Starknet is Rollup (ZK)
Governance
Moonbeam and Starknet governance are both on-chain
Moonbeam vs Starknet Real-Time TPS Chart
Loading Data
Other Comparisons
Moonbeam Comparisons
About Blockchains
About Moonbeam
Moonbeam is an EVM-compatible smart contracts platform built in the Polkadot ecosystem. It's designed for seamless compatibility with Ethereum tooling to provide a user-friendly environment for porting existing and developing new dApps. Also, as the biggest Polkadot parachain Moonbeam encourages cross-chain communication with other parachains.
About Starknet
Starknet stands as a permissionless blockchain solution, functioning as a Validity-Rollup, often referred to as a zero-knowledge rollup (ZK rollup) for Ethereum. It's a Layer 2 (L2) platform that empowers dApps to achieve significant computational scalability while upholding Ethereum's inherent composability and security standards.