- Compare
- Moonbeam vs Solana
Moonbeam vs Solana Scalability
Real-time TPS
Moonbeam TPS is 99.84% lower than Solana TPS
Max TPS (100 blocks)
Moonbeam max TPS is 99.37% lower than Solana max TPS
Max Theoretical TPS
Moonbeam max theoretical TPS is 99.91% lower than Solana max theoretical TPS
Transaction Volume
Moonbeam transaction volume is 99.84% lower than Solana transaction volume
Block Time
Moonbeam block time is 16X longer than Solana block time
Finality
Moonbeam finality is 2.34X longer than Solana finality
Type
Moonbeam is a parachain, while Solana is a layer 1 blockchain
Launch Date
Moonbeam was launched 2 years after Solana
Moonbeam vs Solana Decentralization New
Nakamoto Coefficient
Moonbeam Nakamoto Coefficient is 8.29X higher than Solana Nakamoto Coefficient
Validators
Moonbeam has 42.3% fewer validators than Solana
Stake
Moonbeam stake is 95.97% lower than Solana stake
Consensus Mechanism
Moonbeam is Nominated Proof of Stake, while Solana is PoS
Governance
Moonbeam on-chain governance is better than Solana off-chain governance
Moonbeam vs Solana Real-Time TPS Chart
Loading Data
Other Comparisons
Moonbeam Comparisons
About Blockchains
About Moonbeam
Moonbeam is an EVM-compatible smart contracts platform built in the Polkadot ecosystem. It's designed for seamless compatibility with Ethereum tooling to provide a user-friendly environment for porting existing and developing new dApps. Also, as the biggest Polkadot parachain Moonbeam encourages cross-chain communication with other parachains.
About Solana
Solana stands out as a high-performance blockchain, celebrated for its scalability, speed, and minimal transaction expenses. Featuring a distinctive consensus mechanism dubbed Proof of History (PoH), Solana achieves remarkable scalability and efficiency. Tailored to accommodate dApps, it excels in processing a vast number of transactions swiftly, thereby slashing processing durations and fees. These attributes make it a compelling platform for developers within the cryptocurrency realm.