Starknet vs Optimism Scalability
Real-time TPS
Starknet TPS is 94.42% lower than Optimism TPS
Max TPS (100 blocks)
Starknet max TPS is 1.91X higher than Optimism max TPS
Max Theoretical TPS
Starknet max theoretical TPS is 1.39X higher than Optimism max theoretical TPS
Transaction Volume
Starknet transaction volume is 94.42% lower than Optimism transaction volume
Block Time
Starknet block time is 3.97X longer than Optimism block time
Finality
Starknet finality is 7.9X longer than Optimism finality
Type
Starknet and Optimism are both layer 2 blockchains
Launch Date
Starknet was launched 29 days before Optimism
Starknet vs Optimism Decentralization New
Nakamoto Coefficient
Starknet Nakamoto Coefficient is the same as Optimism Nakamoto Coefficient
Validators
Starknet and Optimism have the same amount of validators
Stake
Starknet and Optimism have no data
Consensus Mechanism
Starknet is Rollup (ZK), while Optimism is Rollup (Optimistic)
Governance
Starknet and Optimism governance are both on-chain
Starknet vs Optimism Real-Time TPS Chart
Loading Data
Other Comparisons
Starknet Comparisons
About Blockchains
About Starknet
Starknet stands as a permissionless blockchain solution, functioning as a Validity-Rollup, often referred to as a zero-knowledge rollup (ZK rollup) for Ethereum. It's a Layer 2 (L2) platform that empowers dApps to achieve significant computational scalability while upholding Ethereum's inherent composability and security standards.
About Optimism
Optimism provides a Layer 2 scaling fix for Ethereum, greatly boosting its scalability and cutting down on gas fees. It maintains robust security measures and guarantees a smooth development experience. Through Optimistic Rollups, it enables swift transaction processing, positioning Ethereum as a viable option for deploying intricate and interactive applications.