Starknet vs Solana Scalability
Real-time TPS
Starknet TPS is 99.81% lower than Solana TPS
Max TPS (100 blocks)
Starknet max TPS is 91.89% lower than Solana max TPS
Max Theoretical TPS
Starknet max theoretical TPS is 98.47% lower than Solana max theoretical TPS
Transaction Volume
Starknet transaction volume is 99.81% lower than Solana transaction volume
Block Time
Starknet block time is 20X longer than Solana block time
Finality
Starknet finality is 623X longer than Solana finality
Type
Starknet is a layer 2 blockchain, while Solana is a layer 1 blockchain
Launch Date
Starknet was launched 2 years after Solana
Starknet vs Solana Decentralization New
Nakamoto Coefficient
Starknet Nakamoto Coefficient is 95.23% lower than Solana Nakamoto Coefficient
Validators
Starknet has 99.9% fewer validators than Solana
Stake
Starknet has no data, while Solana stake is $73.29B
Consensus Mechanism
Starknet is Rollup (ZK), while Solana is PoS
Governance
Starknet on-chain governance is better than Solana off-chain governance
Starknet vs Solana Real-Time TPS Chart
Loading Data
Other Comparisons
Starknet Comparisons
About Blockchains
About Starknet
Starknet stands as a permissionless blockchain solution, functioning as a Validity-Rollup, often referred to as a zero-knowledge rollup (ZK rollup) for Ethereum. It's a Layer 2 (L2) platform that empowers dApps to achieve significant computational scalability while upholding Ethereum's inherent composability and security standards.
About Solana
Solana stands out as a high-performance blockchain, celebrated for its scalability, speed, and minimal transaction expenses. Featuring a distinctive consensus mechanism dubbed Proof of History (PoH), Solana achieves remarkable scalability and efficiency. Tailored to accommodate dApps, it excels in processing a vast number of transactions swiftly, thereby slashing processing durations and fees. These attributes make it a compelling platform for developers within the cryptocurrency realm.