Get listed on Chainspect

Compare Starknet vs Arbitrum

Starknet vs Arbitrum TPS, Transactions, Finality Time

Real-time TPS (1H)

Starknet TPS is 67.28% lower than Arbitrum TPS

Starknet logo
4.11 tx/s
Arbitrum logo
12.57 tx/s

Data from Chainspect

Max TPS (100 blocks)

Starknet max TPS is 81.25% lower than Arbitrum max TPS

Starknet logo
381.6 tx/s
Arbitrum logo
2,036 tx/s

Data from Chainspect

Theoretical TPS

Starknet max theoretical TPS is 83.72% lower than Arbitrum max theoretical TPS

Starknet logo
992 tx/s
Arbitrum logo
6,095 tx/s

Data from Chainspect

Transaction Volume (1H)

Starknet transaction volume is 67.28% lower than Arbitrum transaction volume

Starknet logo
14.8K txns
Arbitrum logo
45.2K txns

Data from Chainspect

Block Time (1H)

Starknet block time is 5.94X longer than Arbitrum block time

Starknet logo
1.75s
Arbitrum logo
295ms

Data from Chainspect

Finality Time

Starknet finality is 9.62X longer than Arbitrum finality

Starknet logo
2h
Arbitrum logo
13m 48s

Data from Chainspect

Total Transactions (All time)

Starknet has 86.68% fewer total transactions than Arbitrum

Starknet logo
318M txns
Arbitrum logo
2.39B txns

Data from Chainspect

Launch Date

Starknet was launched 3 months after Arbitrum

Starknet logo
Nov 16, 2021
Arbitrum logo
Aug 31, 2021

Data from Chainspect

Starknet vs Arbitrum Nakamoto Coefficient

Nakamoto Coefficient

Starknet Nakamoto Coefficient is the same as Arbitrum Nakamoto Coefficient

Starknet logo
1
Arbitrum logo
1

Data from Chainspect

Validators

Starknet and Arbitrum have the same amount of validators

Starknet logo
1
Arbitrum logo
1

Data from Chainspect

Stake

Starknet and Arbitrum have no data

Starknet logo
—
Arbitrum logo
—

Data from Chainspect

Consensus Mechanism

Starknet is Rollup (ZK), while Arbitrum is Rollup (Optimistic)

Starknet logo
Rollup (ZK)
Arbitrum logo
Rollup (Optimistic)

Data from Chainspect

Governance

Starknet and Arbitrum governance are both on-chain

Starknet logo
On-chain
Arbitrum logo
On-chain

Data from Chainspect

Starknet vs Arbitrum Developer Activity

Developers

Starknet has 84.11% fewer developers than Arbitrum

Starknet logo
394
Arbitrum logo
2,481

Data from Chainspect

Commits

Starknet has 92.1% fewer commits than Arbitrum

Starknet logo
17,309
Arbitrum logo
219,255

Data from Chainspect

Repos

Starknet has 78.19% fewer repos than Arbitrum

Starknet logo
29
Arbitrum logo
133

Data from Chainspect

Stars

Starknet has 68.91% fewer stars than Arbitrum

Starknet logo
3,373
Arbitrum logo
10,851

Data from Chainspect

Watchers

Starknet has 91.04% fewer watchers than Arbitrum

Starknet logo
131
Arbitrum logo
1,463

Data from Chainspect

Starknet vs Arbitrum Fees & Market Cap

On-Chain Revenue

Starknet on-chain revenue is 33.92% lower than Arbitrum on-chain revenue

Starknet logo
$10.68K
Arbitrum logo
$16.16K

Data from Chainspect

Average Transaction Fee

Starknet average transaction fee is 3.3X higher than Arbitrum average transaction fee

Starknet logo
$0.04641
Arbitrum logo
$0.01409

Data from Chainspect

Market Cap

Starknet market cap is 35.12% lower than Arbitrum market cap

Starknet logo
$860.1M
Arbitrum logo
$1.326B

Data from Chainspect

FDV

Starknet FDV is 39.66% lower than Arbitrum FDV

Starknet logo
$1.179B
Arbitrum logo
$1.954B

Data from Chainspect

Market Cap / FDV

Starknet Market Cap to FDV ratio is 1.08X higher than Arbitrum Market Cap to FDV ratio

Starknet logo
72.97%
Arbitrum logo
67.86%

Data from Chainspect

Price

Starknet price is 40.68% lower than Arbitrum price

Starknet logo
$0.1159
Arbitrum logo
$0.1954

Data from Chainspect

Starknet vs Arbitrum Real-time TPS Chart

Follow us on X for ATH alerts, TPS spikes and major announcements

Follow