Starknet vs Arbitrum Scalability
Real-time TPS
Starknet TPS is 91.27% lower than Arbitrum TPS
Max TPS (100 blocks)
Starknet max TPS is 71.91% lower than Arbitrum max TPS
Max Theoretical TPS
Starknet max theoretical TPS is 97.52% lower than Arbitrum max theoretical TPS
Transaction Volume
Starknet transaction volume is 91.27% lower than Arbitrum transaction volume
Block Time
Starknet block time is 27X longer than Arbitrum block time
Finality
Starknet finality is 9.62X longer than Arbitrum finality
Type
Starknet and Arbitrum are both layer 2 blockchains
Launch Date
Starknet was launched 3 months after Arbitrum
Starknet vs Arbitrum Decentralization New
Nakamoto Coefficient
Starknet Nakamoto Coefficient is the same as Arbitrum Nakamoto Coefficient
Validators
Starknet and Arbitrum have the same amount of validators
Stake
Starknet and Arbitrum have no data
Consensus Mechanism
Starknet is Rollup (ZK), while Arbitrum is Rollup (Optimistic)
Governance
Starknet and Arbitrum governance are both on-chain
Starknet vs Arbitrum Real-Time TPS Chart
Loading Data
Other Comparisons
Starknet Comparisons
About Blockchains
About Starknet
Starknet stands as a permissionless blockchain solution, functioning as a Validity-Rollup, often referred to as a zero-knowledge rollup (ZK rollup) for Ethereum. It's a Layer 2 (L2) platform that empowers dApps to achieve significant computational scalability while upholding Ethereum's inherent composability and security standards.
About Arbitrum
Arbitrum serves as a Layer 2 scaling solution for Ethereum, leveraging rollups to significantly boost scalability and reduce transaction costs while maintaining robust security. It enables developers to execute EVM-compatible smart contracts with a substantially higher transaction throughput and lower fees compared to Ethereum's main chain, making it a compelling platform for decentralized application development.