Compare Starknet vs Arbitrum

Starknet vs Arbitrum Scalability

Real-time TPS (1H)

Starknet TPS is 78.32% lower than Arbitrum TPS

Starknet logo
5.45 tx/s
Arbitrum logo
25.13 tx/s

Data from Chainspect

Max TPS (100 blocks)

Starknet max TPS is 71.91% lower than Arbitrum max TPS

Starknet logo
381.6 tx/s
Arbitrum logo
1,358 tx/s

Data from Chainspect

Max Theoretical TPS

Starknet max theoretical TPS is 97.52% lower than Arbitrum max theoretical TPS

Starknet logo
992 tx/s
Arbitrum logo
40,000 tx/s

Data from Chainspect

Transaction Volume (1H)

Starknet transaction volume is 78.32% lower than Arbitrum transaction volume

Starknet logo
19.6K txns
Arbitrum logo
90.5K txns

Data from Chainspect

Block Time (1H)

Starknet block time is 9.62X longer than Arbitrum block time

Starknet logo
2.4s
Arbitrum logo
0.25s

Data from Chainspect

Finality

Starknet finality is 9.62X longer than Arbitrum finality

Starknet logo
2h
Arbitrum logo
13m 48s

Data from Chainspect

Type

Starknet and Arbitrum are both layer 2 blockchains

Starknet logo
Layer 2 blockchain
Arbitrum logo
Layer 2 blockchain

Data from Chainspect

New

Total Transactions

Starknet has 85.06% fewer total transactions than Arbitrum

Starknet logo
235M txns
Arbitrum logo
1.58B txns

Data from Chainspect

Launch Date

Starknet was launched 3 months after Arbitrum

Starknet logo
Nov 16, 2021
Arbitrum logo
Aug 31, 2021

Data from Chainspect

Starknet vs Arbitrum Decentralization

Nakamoto Coefficient

Starknet Nakamoto Coefficient is the same as Arbitrum Nakamoto Coefficient

Starknet logo
1
Arbitrum logo
1

Data from Chainspect

Validators

Starknet and Arbitrum have the same amount of validators

Starknet logo
1
Arbitrum logo
1

Data from Chainspect

Stake

Starknet and Arbitrum have no data

Starknet logo
—
Arbitrum logo
—

Data from Chainspect

Consensus Mechanism

Starknet is Rollup (ZK), while Arbitrum is Rollup (Optimistic)

Starknet logo
Rollup (ZK)
Arbitrum logo
Rollup (Optimistic)

Data from Chainspect

Governance

Starknet and Arbitrum governance are both on-chain

Starknet logo
On-chain
Arbitrum logo
On-chain

Data from Chainspect

Starknet vs Arbitrum Developer Activity New

Developers

Starknet has 84.81% fewer developers than Arbitrum

Starknet logo
352
Arbitrum logo
2,318

Data from Chainspect

Repos

Starknet has 78.57% fewer repos than Arbitrum

Starknet logo
27
Arbitrum logo
126

Data from Chainspect

Commits

Starknet has 91.54% fewer commits than Arbitrum

Starknet logo
15,652
Arbitrum logo
185,210

Data from Chainspect

Stars

Starknet has 69.27% fewer stars than Arbitrum

Starknet logo
3,181
Arbitrum logo
10,352

Data from Chainspect

Watchers

Starknet has 92.1% fewer watchers than Arbitrum

Starknet logo
128
Arbitrum logo
1,622

Data from Chainspect

Starknet vs Arbitrum Real-Time TPS Chart

Loading Data

Other Comparisons

About Blockchains

About Starknet

Starknet stands as a permissionless blockchain solution, functioning as a Validity-Rollup, often referred to as a zero-knowledge rollup (ZK rollup) for Ethereum. It's a Layer 2 (L2) platform that empowers dApps to achieve significant computational scalability while upholding Ethereum's inherent composability and security standards.

About Arbitrum

Arbitrum serves as a Layer 2 scaling solution for Ethereum, leveraging rollups to significantly boost scalability and reduce transaction costs while maintaining robust security. It enables developers to execute EVM-compatible smart contracts with a substantially higher transaction throughput and lower fees compared to Ethereum's main chain, making it a compelling platform for decentralized application development.

Blockchains Socials

Starknet Socials

Arbitrum Socials