Moonbeam vs Arbitrum Scalability
Real-time TPS
Moonbeam TPS is 97.03% lower than Arbitrum TPS
Max TPS (100 blocks)
Moonbeam max TPS is 97.84% lower than Arbitrum max TPS
Max Theoretical TPS
Moonbeam max theoretical TPS is 99.85% lower than Arbitrum max theoretical TPS
Transaction Volume
Moonbeam transaction volume is 97.03% lower than Arbitrum transaction volume
Block Time
Moonbeam block time is 25X longer than Arbitrum block time
Finality
Moonbeam finality is 96.37% shorter than Arbitrum finality
Type
Moonbeam is a parachain, while Arbitrum is a layer 2 blockchain
Launch Date
Moonbeam was launched 4 months after Arbitrum
Moonbeam vs Arbitrum Decentralization New
Nakamoto Coefficient
Moonbeam Nakamoto Coefficient is 174X higher than Arbitrum Nakamoto Coefficient
Validators
Moonbeam has 600X more validators than Arbitrum
Stake
Moonbeam stake is $2.947B, while Arbitrum has no data
Consensus Mechanism
Moonbeam is Nominated Proof of Stake, while Arbitrum is Rollup (Optimistic)
Governance
Moonbeam and Arbitrum governance are both on-chain
Moonbeam vs Arbitrum Real-Time TPS Chart
Loading Data
Other Comparisons
Moonbeam Comparisons
About Blockchains
About Moonbeam
Moonbeam is an EVM-compatible smart contracts platform built in the Polkadot ecosystem. It's designed for seamless compatibility with Ethereum tooling to provide a user-friendly environment for porting existing and developing new dApps. Also, as the biggest Polkadot parachain Moonbeam encourages cross-chain communication with other parachains.
About Arbitrum
Arbitrum serves as a Layer 2 scaling solution for Ethereum, leveraging rollups to significantly boost scalability and reduce transaction costs while maintaining robust security. It enables developers to execute EVM-compatible smart contracts with a substantially higher transaction throughput and lower fees compared to Ethereum's main chain, making it a compelling platform for decentralized application development.