Real-time TPS
Moonbeam TPS is 97.28% less than Polygon TPS
Max TPS (100 blocks)
Moonbeam max TPS is 95.09% less than Polygon max TPS
Max Theoretical TPS
Moonbeam max theoretical TPS is 91.82% less than Polygon max theoretical TPS
Total Transactions
Moonbeam total txns is 97.28% less than Polygon total txns
Block Time
Moonbeam block time is 2.78X more than Polygon block time
Finality
Moonbeam finality is 76.56% less than Polygon finality
Type
Moonbeam is a parachain, while Polygon is a layer 2 blockchain
Governance
Moonbeam on-chain governance is better than Polygon off-chain governance
Launch Date
Moonbeam was launched 2 years after Polygon
Moonbeam vs Polygon Real-Time TPS Chart
Loading Data
Other Comparisons
Moonbeam Comparisons
About Blockchains
About Moonbeam
Moonbeam is an EVM-compatible smart contracts platform built in the Polkadot ecosystem. It's designed for seamless compatibility with Ethereum tooling to provide a user-friendly environment for porting existing and developing new dApps. Also, as the biggest Polkadot parachain Moonbeam encourages cross-chain communication with other parachains.
About Polygon
Polygon, formerly Matic Network, is a blockchain platform designed to establish a multi-chain system compatible with Ethereum. It employs a proof-of-stake consensus mechanism similar to Ethereum for on-chain transactions, with its native token being MATIC. Functioning as a "layer two" or "sidechain" scaling solution alongside Ethereum, Polygon facilitates quicker transactions and lower fees. Its inception aimed to tackle Ethereum's major challenges, including high fees, subpar user experience, and limited transaction throughput, aspiring to create an "Ethereum's internet of blockchains" or a multi-chain ecosystem of Ethereum-compatible blockchains.