Compare Moonbeam vs Polygon
Open in ChatGPTMoonbeam vs Polygon Scalability
Real-time TPS (1H)
Moonbeam TPS is 99.51% lower than Polygon TPS
Data from Chainspect
Max TPS (100 blocks)
Moonbeam max TPS is 94.55% lower than Polygon max TPS
Data from Chainspect
Max Theoretical TPS
Moonbeam max theoretical TPS is 97.54% lower than Polygon max theoretical TPS
Data from Chainspect
Transaction Volume (1H)
Moonbeam transaction volume is 99.51% lower than Polygon transaction volume
Data from Chainspect
Block Time (1H)
Moonbeam block time is 3.13X longer than Polygon block time
Data from Chainspect
Finality
Moonbeam finality is 6X longer than Polygon finality
Data from Chainspect
Type
Moonbeam is a parachain, while Polygon is a sidechain
Data from Chainspect
Total Transactions (All time)
Moonbeam has 98.76% fewer total transactions than Polygon
Data from Chainspect
Launch Date
Moonbeam was launched 2 years after Polygon
Data from Chainspect
Moonbeam vs Polygon Decentralization
Nakamoto Coefficient
Moonbeam Nakamoto Coefficient is 4.25X higher than Polygon Nakamoto Coefficient
Data from Chainspect
Validators
Moonbeam has 26.92% fewer validators than Polygon
Data from Chainspect
Stake
Moonbeam stake is 98.82% lower than Polygon stake
Data from Chainspect
Consensus Mechanism
Moonbeam is Nominated Proof of Stake, while Polygon is PoS
Data from Chainspect
Governance
Moonbeam on-chain governance is better than Polygon off-chain governance
Data from Chainspect
Moonbeam vs Polygon Developer Activity
Developers
Moonbeam has 87.66% fewer developers than Polygon
Data from Chainspect
Commits
Moonbeam has 77.6% fewer commits than Polygon
Data from Chainspect
Repos
Moonbeam has 81.09% fewer repos than Polygon
Data from Chainspect
Stars
Moonbeam has 85.17% fewer stars than Polygon
Data from Chainspect
Watchers
Moonbeam has 88.1% fewer watchers than Polygon
Data from Chainspect
Moonbeam vs Polygon Financials New
Chain Revenue
Moonbeam chain revenue is 99.24% lower than Polygon chain revenue
Data from Chainspect
Average Transaction Fee
Moonbeam average transaction fee is 21.04% lower than Polygon average transaction fee
Data from Chainspect
Market Cap
Moonbeam market cap is 98.31% lower than Polygon market cap
Data from Chainspect
FDV
Moonbeam FDV is 98.1% lower than Polygon FDV
Data from Chainspect
Market Cap / FDV
Moonbeam Market Cap to FDV ratio is 10.9% lower than Polygon Market Cap to FDV ratio
Data from Chainspect
Price
Moonbeam price is 83.6% lower than Polygon price
Data from Chainspect
Moonbeam vs Polygon Real-time TPS Chart
Loading Data
Other Comparisons
Moonbeam Comparisons
About Blockchains
About Moonbeam
Moonbeam is an EVM-compatible smart contracts platform built in the Polkadot ecosystem. It's designed for seamless compatibility with Ethereum tooling to provide a user-friendly environment for porting existing and developing new dApps. Also, as the biggest Polkadot parachain Moonbeam encourages cross-chain communication with other parachains.
About Polygon
Polygon, formerly Matic Network, is a blockchain platform designed to establish a multi-chain system compatible with Ethereum. It employs a proof-of-stake consensus mechanism similar to Ethereum for on-chain transactions, with its native token being POL. Functioning as a "layer two" or "sidechain" scaling solution alongside Ethereum, Polygon facilitates quicker transactions and lower fees. Its inception aimed to tackle Ethereum's major challenges, including high fees, subpar user experience, and limited transaction throughput, aspiring to create an "Ethereum's internet of blockchains" or a multi-chain ecosystem of Ethereum-compatible blockchains.