Compare Arbitrum vs Polkadot
Open in ChatGPTArbitrum vs Polkadot Scalability
Real-time TPS (1H)
Arbitrum TPS is 100% higher than Polkadot TPS
Data from Chainspect
Max TPS (100 blocks)
Arbitrum max TPS is 4.4X higher than Polkadot max TPS
Data from Chainspect
Max Theoretical TPS
Arbitrum max theoretical TPS is 6.1X higher than Polkadot max theoretical TPS
Data from Chainspect
Transaction Volume (1H)
Arbitrum transaction volume is 100% higher than Polkadot transaction volume
Data from Chainspect
Block Time (1H)
Arbitrum block time is 95.78% shorter than Polkadot block time
Data from Chainspect
Finality
Arbitrum finality is 28X longer than Polkadot finality
Data from Chainspect
Type
Arbitrum is a layer 2 blockchain, while Polkadot is a layer 1 blockchain
Data from Chainspect
Total Transactions (All time)
Arbitrum has 47X more total transactions than Polkadot
Data from Chainspect
Launch Date
Arbitrum was launched 1 year after Polkadot
Data from Chainspect
Arbitrum vs Polkadot Decentralization
Nakamoto Coefficient
Arbitrum Nakamoto Coefficient is 99.43% lower than Polkadot Nakamoto Coefficient
Data from Chainspect
Validators
Arbitrum has 99.83% fewer validators than Polkadot
Data from Chainspect
Stake
Arbitrum has no data, while Polkadot stake is $1.045B
Data from Chainspect
Consensus Mechanism
Arbitrum is Rollup (Optimistic), while Polkadot is Nominated Proof of Stake
Data from Chainspect
Governance
Arbitrum and Polkadot governance are both on-chain
Data from Chainspect
Arbitrum vs Polkadot Developer Activity
Developers
Arbitrum has 72.89% fewer developers than Polkadot
Data from Chainspect
Commits
Arbitrum has 71.67% fewer commits than Polkadot
Data from Chainspect
Repos
Arbitrum has 74.8% fewer repos than Polkadot
Data from Chainspect
Stars
Arbitrum has 69.69% fewer stars than Polkadot
Data from Chainspect
Watchers
Arbitrum has 30.53% fewer watchers than Polkadot
Data from Chainspect
Arbitrum vs Polkadot Financials New
Chain Revenue
Arbitrum chain revenue is 116,410X higher than Polkadot chain revenue
Data from Chainspect
Average Transaction Fee
Arbitrum average transaction fee is 42.13% lower than Polkadot average transaction fee
Data from Chainspect
Market Cap
Arbitrum market cap is 68.1% lower than Polkadot market cap
Data from Chainspect
FDV
Arbitrum FDV is 59.08% lower than Polkadot FDV
Data from Chainspect
Market Cap / FDV
Arbitrum Market Cap to FDV ratio is 22.05% lower than Polkadot Market Cap to FDV ratio
Data from Chainspect
Price
Arbitrum price is 91.4% lower than Polkadot price
Data from Chainspect
Arbitrum vs Polkadot Real-time TPS Chart
Loading Data
Other Comparisons
Arbitrum Comparisons
About Blockchains
About Arbitrum
Arbitrum serves as a Layer 2 scaling solution for Ethereum, leveraging rollups to significantly boost scalability and reduce transaction costs while maintaining robust security. It enables developers to execute EVM-compatible smart contracts with a substantially higher transaction throughput and lower fees compared to Ethereum's main chain, making it a compelling platform for decentralized application development.
About Polkadot
Polkadot stands out among other blockchain projects for its focus on enhancing the foundational infrastructure of dApps. It aims to enable interoperability between blockchain ecosystems, facilitating seamless communication without intermediaries. Functioning as a "network of networks," Polkadot utilizes parachains — specialized blockchains with unique functionalities and tokens — to enable interaction between diverse blockchain architectures. Powered by the nominated proof-of-stake (PoS) consensus algorithm and drawing inspiration from the Ouroboros protocol, Polkadot offers a robust framework for building interconnected and scalable decentralized systems.