Advertise on Chainspect

Compare Arbitrum vs Polkadot

Arbitrum vs Polkadot TPS, Transactions, Finality Time

Real-time TPS (1H)

Arbitrum TPS is 100% higher than Polkadot TPS

Arbitrum logo
27.59 tx/s
Polkadot logo
0 tx/s

Data from Chainspect

Max TPS (100 blocks)

Arbitrum max TPS is 4.4X higher than Polkadot max TPS

Arbitrum logo
2,036 tx/s
Polkadot logo
462.7 tx/s

Data from Chainspect

Theoretical TPS

Arbitrum max theoretical TPS is 6.1X higher than Polkadot max theoretical TPS

Arbitrum logo
6,095 tx/s
Polkadot logo
1,000 tx/s

Data from Chainspect

Transaction Volume (1H)

Arbitrum transaction volume is 100% higher than Polkadot transaction volume

Arbitrum logo
99.3K txns
Polkadot logo
0 txns

Data from Chainspect

Block Time (1H)

Arbitrum block time is 95.84% shorter than Polkadot block time

Arbitrum logo
249ms
Polkadot logo
5.99s

Data from Chainspect

Finality Time

Arbitrum finality is 28X longer than Polkadot finality

Arbitrum logo
13m 48s
Polkadot logo
30s

Data from Chainspect

Total Transactions (All time)

Arbitrum has 50X more total transactions than Polkadot

Arbitrum logo
2.31B txns
Polkadot logo
46M txns

Data from Chainspect

Launch Date

Arbitrum was launched 1 year after Polkadot

Arbitrum logo
Aug 31, 2021
Polkadot logo
May 26, 2020

Data from Chainspect

Arbitrum vs Polkadot Nakamoto Coefficient

Nakamoto Coefficient

Arbitrum Nakamoto Coefficient is 99.41% lower than Polkadot Nakamoto Coefficient

Arbitrum logo
1
Polkadot logo
172

Data from Chainspect

Validators

Arbitrum has 99.83% fewer validators than Polkadot

Arbitrum logo
1
Polkadot logo
600

Data from Chainspect

Stake

Arbitrum has no data, while Polkadot stake is $661.2M

Arbitrum logo
Polkadot logo
$661.2M

Data from Chainspect

Consensus Mechanism

Arbitrum is Rollup (Optimistic), while Polkadot is Nominated Proof of Stake

Arbitrum logo
Rollup (Optimistic)
Polkadot logo
Nominated Proof of Stake

Data from Chainspect

Governance

Arbitrum and Polkadot governance are both on-chain

Arbitrum logo
On-chain
Polkadot logo
On-chain

Data from Chainspect

Arbitrum vs Polkadot Developer Activity

Developers

Arbitrum has 72.9% fewer developers than Polkadot

Arbitrum logo
2,461
Polkadot logo
9,082

Data from Chainspect

Commits

Arbitrum has 71.41% fewer commits than Polkadot

Arbitrum logo
200,603
Polkadot logo
701,813

Data from Chainspect

Repos

Arbitrum has 76.17% fewer repos than Polkadot

Arbitrum logo
132
Polkadot logo
554

Data from Chainspect

Stars

Arbitrum has 69.61% fewer stars than Polkadot

Arbitrum logo
10,815
Polkadot logo
35,588

Data from Chainspect

Watchers

Arbitrum has 31.95% fewer watchers than Polkadot

Arbitrum logo
1,482
Polkadot logo
2,178

Data from Chainspect

Arbitrum vs Polkadot Fees & Market Cap

On-Chain Revenue

Arbitrum on-chain revenue is 612,850X higher than Polkadot on-chain revenue

Arbitrum logo
$7.426K
Polkadot logo
$0.01212

Data from Chainspect

Average Transaction Fee

Arbitrum average transaction fee is 1,628X higher than Polkadot average transaction fee

Arbitrum logo
$0.007377
Polkadot logo
$0.00000453

Data from Chainspect

Market Cap

Arbitrum market cap is 60.62% lower than Polkadot market cap

Arbitrum logo
$504.8M
Polkadot logo
$1.282B

Data from Chainspect

FDV

Arbitrum FDV is 52.31% lower than Polkadot FDV

Arbitrum logo
$755.8M
Polkadot logo
$1.585B

Data from Chainspect

Market Cap / FDV

Arbitrum Market Cap to FDV ratio is 17.44% lower than Polkadot Market Cap to FDV ratio

Arbitrum logo
66.78%
Polkadot logo
80.89%

Data from Chainspect

Price

Arbitrum price is 89.98% lower than Polkadot price

Arbitrum logo
$0.07558
Polkadot logo
$0.7547

Data from Chainspect

Arbitrum vs Polkadot Real-time TPS Chart

Follow us on X for ATH alerts, TPS spikes and major announcements

Follow