Bybit referral banner

Compare Arbitrum vs Polkadot

Arbitrum vs Polkadot TPS, Transactions, Finality Time

Real-time TPS (1H)

Arbitrum TPS is 23.52 tx/s, while Polkadot TPS is 0 tx/s

Arbitrum logo
23.52 tx/s
Polkadot logo
0 tx/s

Data from Chainspect

Max TPS (100 blocks)

Arbitrum max TPS is 4.4X higher than Polkadot max TPS

Arbitrum logo
2,036 tx/s
Polkadot logo
462.7 tx/s

Data from Chainspect

Theoretical TPS

Arbitrum max theoretical TPS is 6.1X higher than Polkadot max theoretical TPS

Arbitrum logo
6,095 tx/s
Polkadot logo
1,000 tx/s

Data from Chainspect

Transaction Volume (1H)

Arbitrum transaction volume is 84.6K txns, while Polkadot transaction volume is 0 txns

Arbitrum logo
84.6K txns
Polkadot logo
0 txns

Data from Chainspect

Block Time (1H)

Arbitrum block time is 95.58% shorter than Polkadot block time

Arbitrum logo
266ms
Polkadot logo
6.02s

Data from Chainspect

Finality Time

Arbitrum finality is 28X longer than Polkadot finality

Arbitrum logo
13m 48s
Polkadot logo
30s

Data from Chainspect

Total Transactions (All time)

Arbitrum has 53X more total transactions than Polkadot

Arbitrum logo
2.43B txns
Polkadot logo
46.1M txns

Data from Chainspect

Launch Date

Arbitrum was launched 1 year after Polkadot

Arbitrum logo
Aug 31, 2021
Polkadot logo
May 26, 2020

Data from Chainspect

Arbitrum vs Polkadot Nakamoto Coefficient

Nakamoto Coefficient

Arbitrum Nakamoto Coefficient is 99.35% lower than Polkadot Nakamoto Coefficient

Arbitrum logo
1
Polkadot logo
153

Data from Chainspect

Validators

Arbitrum has 99.8% fewer validators than Polkadot

Arbitrum logo
1
Polkadot logo
500

Data from Chainspect

Stake

Arbitrum has no data, while Polkadot stake is $759M

Arbitrum logo
—
Polkadot logo
$759M

Data from Chainspect

Consensus Mechanism

Arbitrum is Rollup (Optimistic), while Polkadot is Nominated Proof of Stake

Arbitrum logo
Rollup (Optimistic)
Polkadot logo
Nominated Proof of Stake

Data from Chainspect

Governance

Arbitrum and Polkadot governance are both on-chain

Arbitrum logo
On-chain
Polkadot logo
On-chain

Data from Chainspect

Arbitrum vs Polkadot Developer Activity

Developers

Arbitrum has 72.67% fewer developers than Polkadot

Arbitrum logo
2,495
Polkadot logo
9,130

Data from Chainspect

Commits

Arbitrum has 68.83% fewer commits than Polkadot

Arbitrum logo
220,615
Polkadot logo
707,879

Data from Chainspect

Repos

Arbitrum has 76.26% fewer repos than Polkadot

Arbitrum logo
137
Polkadot logo
577

Data from Chainspect

Stars

Arbitrum has 69.48% fewer stars than Polkadot

Arbitrum logo
10,881
Polkadot logo
35,654

Data from Chainspect

Watchers

Arbitrum has 32.47% fewer watchers than Polkadot

Arbitrum logo
1,458
Polkadot logo
2,159

Data from Chainspect

Arbitrum vs Polkadot Fees & Market Cap

On-Chain Revenue (1D)

Arbitrum on-chain revenue is $13.5K, while Polkadot on-chain revenue is $0

Arbitrum logo
$13.5K
Polkadot logo
$0

Data from Chainspect

Average Transaction Fee (1D)

Arbitrum average transaction fee is $0.0135, while Polkadot average transaction fee is $0

Arbitrum logo
$0.0135
Polkadot logo
$0

Data from Chainspect

Market Cap

Arbitrum market cap is 28.91% lower than Polkadot market cap

Arbitrum logo
$1.01B
Polkadot logo
$1.43B

Data from Chainspect

FDV

Arbitrum FDV is 15.92% lower than Polkadot FDV

Arbitrum logo
$1.47B
Polkadot logo
$1.75B

Data from Chainspect

Market Cap / FDV

Arbitrum Market Cap to FDV ratio is 15.45% lower than Polkadot Market Cap to FDV ratio

Arbitrum logo
68.92%
Polkadot logo
81.51%

Data from Chainspect

Price

Arbitrum price is 82.34% lower than Polkadot price

Arbitrum logo
$0.1471
Polkadot logo
$0.8332

Data from Chainspect

Arbitrum vs Polkadot Real-time TPS Chart

Be first to spot a chain's next move. Daily data insights on our LinkedIn

Follow on LinkedIn