Moonbeam vs Optimism Scalability
Real-time TPS
Moonbeam TPS is 95.12% lower than Optimism TPS
Max TPS (100 blocks)
Moonbeam max TPS is 85.36% lower than Optimism max TPS
Max Theoretical TPS
Moonbeam max theoretical TPS is 91.82% lower than Optimism max theoretical TPS
Transaction Volume
Moonbeam transaction volume is 95.12% lower than Optimism transaction volume
Block Time
Moonbeam block time is 3.06X longer than Optimism block time
Finality
Moonbeam finality is 97.02% shorter than Optimism finality
Type
Moonbeam is a parachain, while Optimism is a layer 2 blockchain
Launch Date
Moonbeam was launched 26 days after Optimism
Moonbeam vs Optimism Decentralization New
Nakamoto Coefficient
Moonbeam Nakamoto Coefficient is 174X higher than Optimism Nakamoto Coefficient
Validators
Moonbeam has 600X more validators than Optimism
Stake
Moonbeam stake is $2.947B, while Optimism has no data
Consensus Mechanism
Moonbeam is Nominated Proof of Stake, while Optimism is Rollup (Optimistic)
Governance
Moonbeam and Optimism governance are both on-chain
Moonbeam vs Optimism Real-Time TPS Chart
Loading Data
Other Comparisons
Moonbeam Comparisons
About Blockchains
About Moonbeam
Moonbeam is an EVM-compatible smart contracts platform built in the Polkadot ecosystem. It's designed for seamless compatibility with Ethereum tooling to provide a user-friendly environment for porting existing and developing new dApps. Also, as the biggest Polkadot parachain Moonbeam encourages cross-chain communication with other parachains.
About Optimism
Optimism provides a Layer 2 scaling fix for Ethereum, greatly boosting its scalability and cutting down on gas fees. It maintains robust security measures and guarantees a smooth development experience. Through Optimistic Rollups, it enables swift transaction processing, positioning Ethereum as a viable option for deploying intricate and interactive applications.