Optimism vs Solana Scalability
Real-time TPS
Optimism TPS is 98.28% lower than Solana TPS
Max TPS (100 blocks)
Optimism max TPS is 94.33% lower than Solana max TPS
Max Theoretical TPS
Optimism max theoretical TPS is 98.9% lower than Solana max theoretical TPS
Transaction Volume
Optimism transaction volume is 98.28% lower than Solana transaction volume
Block Time
Optimism block time is 5.11X longer than Solana block time
Finality
Optimism finality is 79X longer than Solana finality
Type
Optimism is a layer 2 blockchain, while Solana is a layer 1 blockchain
Launch Date
Optimism was launched 2 years after Solana
Optimism vs Solana Decentralization New
Nakamoto Coefficient
Optimism Nakamoto Coefficient is 95.23% lower than Solana Nakamoto Coefficient
Validators
Optimism has 99.9% fewer validators than Solana
Stake
Optimism has no data, while Solana stake is $78.48B
Consensus Mechanism
Optimism is Rollup (Optimistic), while Solana is PoS
Governance
Optimism on-chain governance is better than Solana off-chain governance
Optimism vs Solana Real-Time TPS Chart
Loading Data
Other Comparisons
Optimism Comparisons
About Blockchains
About Optimism
Optimism provides a Layer 2 scaling fix for Ethereum, greatly boosting its scalability and cutting down on gas fees. It maintains robust security measures and guarantees a smooth development experience. Through Optimistic Rollups, it enables swift transaction processing, positioning Ethereum as a viable option for deploying intricate and interactive applications.
About Solana
Solana stands out as a high-performance blockchain, celebrated for its scalability, speed, and minimal transaction expenses. Featuring a distinctive consensus mechanism dubbed Proof of History (PoH), Solana achieves remarkable scalability and efficiency. Tailored to accommodate dApps, it excels in processing a vast number of transactions swiftly, thereby slashing processing durations and fees. These attributes make it a compelling platform for developers within the cryptocurrency realm.