- Compare
- Arbitrum vs Moonbeam
Arbitrum vs Moonbeam Scalability
Real-time TPS
Arbitrum TPS is 23X higher than Moonbeam TPS
Max TPS (100 blocks)
Arbitrum max TPS is 46X higher than Moonbeam max TPS
Max Theoretical TPS
Arbitrum max theoretical TPS is 685X higher than Moonbeam max theoretical TPS
Transaction Volume
Arbitrum transaction volume is 23X higher than Moonbeam transaction volume
Block Time
Arbitrum block time is 95.93% shorter than Moonbeam block time
Finality
Arbitrum finality is 28X longer than Moonbeam finality
Type
Arbitrum is a layer 2 blockchain, while Moonbeam is a parachain
Launch Date
Arbitrum was launched 4 months before Moonbeam
Arbitrum vs Moonbeam Decentralization New
Nakamoto Coefficient
Arbitrum Nakamoto Coefficient is 99.42% lower than Moonbeam Nakamoto Coefficient
Validators
Arbitrum has 99.83% fewer validators than Moonbeam
Stake
Arbitrum has no data, while Moonbeam stake is $2.947B
Consensus Mechanism
Arbitrum is Rollup (Optimistic), while Moonbeam is Nominated Proof of Stake
Governance
Arbitrum and Moonbeam governance are both on-chain
Arbitrum vs Moonbeam Real-Time TPS Chart
Loading Data
Other Comparisons
Arbitrum Comparisons
About Blockchains
About Arbitrum
Arbitrum serves as a Layer 2 scaling solution for Ethereum, leveraging rollups to significantly boost scalability and reduce transaction costs while maintaining robust security. It enables developers to execute EVM-compatible smart contracts with a substantially higher transaction throughput and lower fees compared to Ethereum's main chain, making it a compelling platform for decentralized application development.
About Moonbeam
Moonbeam is an EVM-compatible smart contracts platform built in the Polkadot ecosystem. It's designed for seamless compatibility with Ethereum tooling to provide a user-friendly environment for porting existing and developing new dApps. Also, as the biggest Polkadot parachain Moonbeam encourages cross-chain communication with other parachains.