Arbitrum vs Hedera Scalability
Real-time TPS
Arbitrum TPS is 8.02X higher than Hedera TPS
Max TPS (100 blocks)
Arbitrum max TPS is 58.86% lower than Hedera max TPS
Max Theoretical TPS
Arbitrum max theoretical TPS is 4X higher than Hedera max theoretical TPS
Transaction Volume
Arbitrum transaction volume is 8.02X higher than Hedera transaction volume
Block Time
Arbitrum block time is 87.52% shorter than Hedera block time
Finality
Arbitrum finality is 100% longer than Hedera finality
Type
Arbitrum is a layer 2 blockchain, while Hedera is a layer 1 blockchain
Launch Date
Arbitrum was launched 2 years after Hedera
Arbitrum vs Hedera Decentralization New
Nakamoto Coefficient
Arbitrum Nakamoto Coefficient is 83.33% lower than Hedera Nakamoto Coefficient
Validators
Arbitrum has 96.77% fewer validators than Hedera
Stake
Arbitrum has no data, while Hedera stake is $3.439B
Consensus Mechanism
Arbitrum is Rollup (Optimistic), while Hedera is PoS
Governance
Arbitrum on-chain governance is better than Hedera council governance
Arbitrum vs Hedera Real-Time TPS Chart
Loading Data
Other Comparisons
Arbitrum Comparisons
About Blockchains
About Arbitrum
Arbitrum serves as a Layer 2 scaling solution for Ethereum, leveraging rollups to significantly boost scalability and reduce transaction costs while maintaining robust security. It enables developers to execute EVM-compatible smart contracts with a substantially higher transaction throughput and lower fees compared to Ethereum's main chain, making it a compelling platform for decentralized application development.
About Hedera
Hedera operates as a public network employing the hashgraph consensus algorithm for rapid and secure transaction validation. Governed by a council of esteemed organizations, Hedera ensures consistent progress and decentralization. Distinguished by its high throughput, security, and fair transaction ordering, Hedera strives to establish a trust layer for the internet.