Bybit referral banner

Compare Arbitrum vs eCash

Arbitrum vs eCash TPS, Transactions, Finality Time

Real-time TPS (1H)

Arbitrum TPS is 1,181X higher than eCash TPS

Arbitrum logo
16.9 tx/s
eCash logo
0.01 tx/s

Data from Chainspect

Max TPS (100 blocks)

Arbitrum max TPS is 65X higher than eCash max TPS

Arbitrum logo
2,036 tx/s
eCash logo
31.24 tx/s

Data from Chainspect

Theoretical TPS

Arbitrum max theoretical TPS is 116X higher than eCash max theoretical TPS

Arbitrum logo
6,095 tx/s
eCash logo
52.43 tx/s

Data from Chainspect

Transaction Volume (1H)

Arbitrum transaction volume is 1,737X higher than eCash transaction volume

Arbitrum logo
60.8K txns
eCash logo
35 txns

Data from Chainspect

Block Time (1H)

Arbitrum block time is 99.97% shorter than eCash block time

Arbitrum logo
276ms
eCash logo
13m 37s

Data from Chainspect

Finality Time

Arbitrum finality is 100% longer than eCash finality

Arbitrum logo
13m 48s
eCash logo
0s

Data from Chainspect

Total Transactions (All time)

Arbitrum has 272X more total transactions than eCash

Arbitrum logo
2.4B txns
eCash logo
8.83M txns

Data from Chainspect

Launch Date

Arbitrum was launched 10 months after eCash

Arbitrum logo
Aug 31, 2021
eCash logo
Nov 15, 2020

Data from Chainspect

Arbitrum vs eCash Nakamoto Coefficient

Nakamoto Coefficient

Arbitrum Nakamoto Coefficient is 50% lower than eCash Nakamoto Coefficient

Arbitrum logo
1
eCash logo
2

Data from Chainspect

Validators/Miners

Arbitrum has 97.37% fewer validators than eCash has miners

Arbitrum logo
1
eCash logo
38

Data from Chainspect

Stake/Hashrate

Arbitrum has no data, while eCash hashrate is 0.0412 EH/s

Arbitrum logo
—
eCash logo
0.0412 EH/s

Data from Chainspect

Consensus Mechanism

Arbitrum is Rollup (Optimistic), while eCash is PoW

Arbitrum logo
Rollup (Optimistic)
eCash logo
Proof of Work (PoW)

Data from Chainspect

Governance

Arbitrum on-chain governance is better than eCash council governance

Arbitrum logo
On-chain
eCash logo
Council

Data from Chainspect

Arbitrum vs eCash Developer Activity

Developers

Arbitrum has 2.54X more developers than eCash

Arbitrum logo
2,486
eCash logo
979

Data from Chainspect

Commits

Arbitrum has 5.73X more commits than eCash

Arbitrum logo
219,528
eCash logo
38,337

Data from Chainspect

Repos

Arbitrum has 33X more repos than eCash

Arbitrum logo
133
eCash logo
4

Data from Chainspect

Stars

Arbitrum has 7.91X more stars than eCash

Arbitrum logo
10,857
eCash logo
1,372

Data from Chainspect

Watchers

Arbitrum has 9.68X more watchers than eCash

Arbitrum logo
1,462
eCash logo
151

Data from Chainspect

Arbitrum vs eCash Fees & Market Cap

On-Chain Revenue (1D)

Arbitrum on-chain revenue is 19,089,953,235,933X higher than eCash on-chain revenue

Arbitrum logo
$19.1K
eCash logo
$0.000000000999

Data from Chainspect

Average Transaction Fee (1D)

Arbitrum average transaction fee is 24,725,295,721X higher than eCash average transaction fee

Arbitrum logo
$0.0116
eCash logo
$0.000000000000471

Data from Chainspect

Market Cap

Arbitrum market cap is 9.63X higher than eCash market cap

Arbitrum logo
$1.3B
eCash logo
$135M

Data from Chainspect

FDV

Arbitrum FDV is 13X higher than eCash FDV

Arbitrum logo
$1.89B
eCash logo
$141M

Data from Chainspect

Market Cap / FDV

Arbitrum Market Cap to FDV ratio is 27.99% lower than eCash Market Cap to FDV ratio

Arbitrum logo
68.92%
eCash logo
95.72%

Data from Chainspect

Price

Arbitrum price is 28,075X higher than eCash price

Arbitrum logo
$0.1891
eCash logo
$0.000006737

Data from Chainspect

Arbitrum vs eCash Real-time TPS Chart

Follow us on X for ATH alerts, TPS spikes and major announcements

Follow