Compare Arbitrum vs eCash

Arbitrum vs eCash Scalability

Real-time TPS (1H)

Arbitrum TPS is 394X higher than eCash TPS

Arbitrum logo
32.1 tx/s
eCash logo
0.08 tx/s

Data from Chainspect

Max TPS (100 blocks)

Arbitrum max TPS is 43X higher than eCash max TPS

Arbitrum logo
1,358 tx/s
eCash logo
31.24 tx/s

Data from Chainspect

Max Theoretical TPS

Arbitrum max theoretical TPS is 763X higher than eCash max theoretical TPS

Arbitrum logo
40,000 tx/s
eCash logo
52.43 tx/s

Data from Chainspect

Transaction Volume (1H)

Arbitrum transaction volume is 394X higher than eCash transaction volume

Arbitrum logo
116K txns
eCash logo
293 txns

Data from Chainspect

Block Time (1H)

Arbitrum block time is 99.93% shorter than eCash block time

Arbitrum logo
0.25s
eCash logo
5m 56s

Data from Chainspect

Finality

Arbitrum finality is 1.38X longer than eCash finality

Arbitrum logo
13m 48s
eCash logo
10m

Data from Chainspect

Type

Arbitrum is a layer 2 blockchain, while eCash is a layer 1 blockchain

Arbitrum logo
Layer 2 blockchain
eCash logo
Layer 1 blockchain

Data from Chainspect

New

Total Transactions

Arbitrum has 229X more total transactions than eCash

Arbitrum logo
1.69B txns
eCash logo
7.36M txns

Data from Chainspect

Launch Date

Arbitrum was launched 10 months after eCash

Arbitrum logo
Aug 31, 2021
eCash logo
Nov 15, 2020

Data from Chainspect

Arbitrum vs eCash Decentralization

Nakamoto Coefficient

Arbitrum Nakamoto Coefficient is 50% lower than eCash Nakamoto Coefficient

Arbitrum logo
1
eCash logo
2

Data from Chainspect

Validators/Miners

Arbitrum has 93.75% fewer validators than eCash has miners

Arbitrum logo
1
eCash logo
16

Data from Chainspect

Stake/Hashrate

Arbitrum has no data, while eCash hashrate is 0.0856 EH/s

Arbitrum logo
—
eCash logo
0.0856 EH/s

Data from Chainspect

Consensus Mechanism

Arbitrum is Rollup (Optimistic), while eCash is PoW

Arbitrum logo
Rollup (Optimistic)
eCash logo
Proof of Work (PoW)

Data from Chainspect

Governance

Arbitrum on-chain governance is better than eCash council governance

Arbitrum logo
On-chain
eCash logo
Council

Data from Chainspect

Arbitrum vs eCash Developer Activity

Developers

Arbitrum has 2.48X more developers than eCash

Arbitrum logo
2,335
eCash logo
942

Data from Chainspect

Repos

Arbitrum has 32X more repos than eCash

Arbitrum logo
128
eCash logo
4

Data from Chainspect

Commits

Arbitrum has 5.24X more commits than eCash

Arbitrum logo
188,728
eCash logo
36,050

Data from Chainspect

Stars

Arbitrum has 7.87X more stars than eCash

Arbitrum logo
10,464
eCash logo
1,329

Data from Chainspect

Watchers

Arbitrum has 11X more watchers than eCash

Arbitrum logo
1,619
eCash logo
151

Data from Chainspect

Arbitrum vs eCash Financials New

Chain Revenue

Arbitrum chain revenue is $23.47K, while eCash has no data

Arbitrum logo
$23.47K
eCash logo
—

Data from Chainspect

Average Transaction Fee

Arbitrum average transaction fee is $0.008761, while eCash has no data

Arbitrum logo
$0.008761
eCash logo
—

Data from Chainspect

Price

Arbitrum price is 20,107X higher than eCash price

Arbitrum logo
$0.3027
eCash logo
$0.00001505

Data from Chainspect

Market Cap

Arbitrum market cap is 5.55X higher than eCash market cap

Arbitrum logo
$1.668B
eCash logo
$300.3M

Data from Chainspect

Arbitrum vs eCash Real-Time TPS Chart

Loading Data

Other Comparisons

About Blockchains

About Arbitrum

Arbitrum serves as a Layer 2 scaling solution for Ethereum, leveraging rollups to significantly boost scalability and reduce transaction costs while maintaining robust security. It enables developers to execute EVM-compatible smart contracts with a substantially higher transaction throughput and lower fees compared to Ethereum's main chain, making it a compelling platform for decentralized application development.

About eCash

eCash is a blockchain project led by Bitcoin ABC, aiming to enhance L1 scalability, security, transaction speed, and cost-effectiveness. It integrates the Avalanche consensus protocol with its base PoW consensus, making it effectively a hybrid consensus network that is secured against 51% attacks and extensible via subnets and hard-fork free upgrades. These improvements address scalability concerns, enable rapid transaction finality, interoperability, and guarantee subcent fees. Despite these improvements, eCash remains committed to maintaining the decentralization principles of the original Bitcoin protocol. By prioritizing scalability and extensibility, eCash seeks to realize the vision of Bitcoin as a practical and accessible peer-to-peer electronic cash system.

Blockchains Socials

Arbitrum Socials

eCash Socials