Arbitrum vs eCash

Arbitrum vs eCash Scalability

Real-time TPS

Chainspect

Arbitrum TPS is 488X higher than eCash TPS

Arbitrum logo
17.92 tx/s
eCash logo
0.04 tx/s

Max TPS (100 blocks)

Chainspect

Arbitrum max TPS is 43X higher than eCash max TPS

Arbitrum logo
1,358 tx/s
eCash logo
31.24 tx/s

Max Theoretical TPS

Chainspect

Arbitrum max theoretical TPS is 763X higher than eCash max theoretical TPS

Arbitrum logo
40,000 tx/s
eCash logo
52.43 tx/s

Transaction Volume

Chainspect

Arbitrum transaction volume is 489X higher than eCash transaction volume

Arbitrum logo
64,511 txns
eCash logo
132 txns

Block Time

Chainspect

Arbitrum block time is 99.95% shorter than eCash block time

Arbitrum logo
0.25s
eCash logo
9m 43s

Finality

Chainspect

Arbitrum finality is 1.38X longer than eCash finality

Arbitrum logo
13m 48s
eCash logo
10m

Type

Chainspect

Arbitrum is a layer 2 blockchain, while eCash is a layer 1 blockchain

Arbitrum logo
Layer 2 blockchain
eCash logo
Layer 1 blockchain

Launch Date

Chainspect

Arbitrum was launched 10 months after eCash

Arbitrum logo
Aug 31, 2021
eCash logo
Nov 15, 2020

Arbitrum vs eCash Decentralization

Nakamoto Coefficient

Chainspect

Arbitrum Nakamoto Coefficient is 66.66% lower than eCash Nakamoto Coefficient

Arbitrum logo
1
eCash logo
3

Validators/Miners

Chainspect

Arbitrum has 93.33% fewer validators than eCash has miners

Arbitrum logo
1
eCash logo
15

Stake/Hashrate

Chainspect

Arbitrum has no data, while eCash hashrate is 0.09 EH/s

Arbitrum logo
—
eCash logo
0.09 EH/s

Consensus Mechanism

Chainspect

Arbitrum is Rollup (Optimistic), while eCash is PoW

Arbitrum logo
Rollup (Optimistic)
eCash logo
Proof of Work (PoW)

Governance

Chainspect

Arbitrum on-chain governance is better than eCash council governance

Arbitrum logo
On-chain
eCash logo
Council

Arbitrum vs eCash Developer Activity New

Developers

Chainspect

Arbitrum has 2.46X more developers than eCash

Arbitrum logo
2,298
eCash logo
936

Repos

Chainspect

Arbitrum has 32X more repos than eCash

Arbitrum logo
126
eCash logo
4

Commits

Chainspect

Arbitrum has 5.17X more commits than eCash

Arbitrum logo
184,536
eCash logo
35,717

Stars

Chainspect

Arbitrum has 7.8X more stars than eCash

Arbitrum logo
10,276
eCash logo
1,318

Watchers

Chainspect

Arbitrum has 11X more watchers than eCash

Arbitrum logo
1,714
eCash logo
155

Arbitrum vs eCash Real-Time TPS Chart

Loading Data

Other Comparisons

About Blockchains

About Arbitrum

Arbitrum serves as a Layer 2 scaling solution for Ethereum, leveraging rollups to significantly boost scalability and reduce transaction costs while maintaining robust security. It enables developers to execute EVM-compatible smart contracts with a substantially higher transaction throughput and lower fees compared to Ethereum's main chain, making it a compelling platform for decentralized application development.

About eCash

eCash is a blockchain project led by Bitcoin ABC, aiming to enhance L1 scalability, security, transaction speed, and cost-effectiveness. It integrates the Avalanche consensus protocol with its base PoW consensus, making it effectively a hybrid consensus network that is secured against 51% attacks and extensible via subnets and hard-fork free upgrades. These improvements address scalability concerns, enable rapid transaction finality, interoperability, and guarantee subcent fees. Despite these improvements, eCash remains committed to maintaining the decentralization principles of the original Bitcoin protocol. By prioritizing scalability and extensibility, eCash seeks to realize the vision of Bitcoin as a practical and accessible peer-to-peer electronic cash system.

Blockchains Socials

Arbitrum Socials

eCash Socials