Witnet vs Arbitrum
Witnet vs Arbitrum Scalability
Real-time TPS (1H)
Witnet has no data, while Arbitrum TPS is 16.62 tx/s
Max TPS (100 blocks)
Witnet has no data, while Arbitrum max TPS is 1,358 tx/s
Max Theoretical TPS
Witnet has no data, while Arbitrum max theoretical TPS is 40,000 tx/s
Transaction Volume (1H)
Witnet has no data, while Arbitrum transaction volume is 59.8K txns
Block Time (1H)
Witnet has no data, while Arbitrum block time is 0.25s
Finality
Witnet has no data, while Arbitrum finality is 13m 48s
Type
Witnet has no data, while Arbitrum is a layer 2 blockchain
Total Transactions
Neither Witnet nor Arbitrum have data for total transactions
Launch Date
Witnet has no data, while Arbitrum was launched on Aug 31, 2021
Witnet vs Arbitrum Decentralization
Nakamoto Coefficient
Witnet has no data, while Arbitrum Nakamoto Coefficient is 1
Validators/Miners
Witnet has no data, while Arbitrum has 1 validators
Stake/Hashrate
Witnet and Arbitrum have no data
Consensus Mechanism
Witnet has no data, while Arbitrum is Rollup (Optimistic)
Governance
Witnet has no data, while Arbitrum governance is on-chain
Witnet vs Arbitrum Developer Activity New
Developers
Witnet has no data, while Arbitrum has 2,303 developers
Repos
Witnet has no data, while Arbitrum has 126 repos
Commits
Witnet has no data, while Arbitrum has 184,679 commits
Stars
Witnet has no data, while Arbitrum has 10,300 stars
Watchers
Witnet has no data, while Arbitrum has 1,714 watchers
Other Comparisons
Witnet Comparisons
About Blockchains
About Witnet
The first Layer 1 Proof of Stake oracle network. Powered by the $WIT coin.
About Arbitrum
Arbitrum serves as a Layer 2 scaling solution for Ethereum, leveraging rollups to significantly boost scalability and reduce transaction costs while maintaining robust security. It enables developers to execute EVM-compatible smart contracts with a substantially higher transaction throughput and lower fees compared to Ethereum's main chain, making it a compelling platform for decentralized application development.