TON vs Polygon
TON vs Polygon Scalability
Real-time TPS
TON TPS is 69.46% lower than Polygon TPS
Max TPS (100 blocks)
TON max TPS is 3.59X higher than Polygon max TPS
Max Theoretical TPS
TON max theoretical TPS is 147X higher than Polygon max theoretical TPS
Transaction Volume
TON transaction volume is 69.46% lower than Polygon transaction volume
Block Time
TON block time is 1.18X longer than Polygon block time
Finality
TON finality is 1.2X longer than Polygon finality
Type
TON is a layer 1 blockchain, while Polygon is a sidechain
Launch Date
TON was launched 1 year after Polygon
TON vs Polygon Decentralization New
Nakamoto Coefficient
TON Nakamoto Coefficient is 21X higher than Polygon Nakamoto Coefficient
Validators
TON has 3.3X more validators than Polygon
Stake
TON stake is 1.41X higher than Polygon stake
Consensus Mechanism
TON and Polygon are both PoS
Governance
TON on-chain governance is better than Polygon off-chain governance
TON vs Polygon Real-Time TPS Chart
Loading Data
Other Comparisons
TON Comparisons
About Blockchains
About TON
The Open Network (TON) is a decentralized and open internet platform made up of several components. These include: TON Blockchain, TON DNS, TON Storage, and TON Sites. TON Blockchain is the core protocol that connects TON’s underlying infrastructure together to form the greater TON Ecosystem. TON is focused on achieving widespread cross-chain interoperability, while operating in a highly scalable secure framework. TON is designed to process millions of transactions per second (TPS), with the goal of eventually reaching hundreds of millions of users moving forward.
About Polygon
Polygon, formerly Matic Network, is a blockchain platform designed to establish a multi-chain system compatible with Ethereum. It employs a proof-of-stake consensus mechanism similar to Ethereum for on-chain transactions, with its native token being POL. Functioning as a "layer two" or "sidechain" scaling solution alongside Ethereum, Polygon facilitates quicker transactions and lower fees. Its inception aimed to tackle Ethereum's major challenges, including high fees, subpar user experience, and limited transaction throughput, aspiring to create an "Ethereum's internet of blockchains" or a multi-chain ecosystem of Ethereum-compatible blockchains.