- Compare
- TON vs Polygon
TON vs Polygon Scalability
Real-time TPS
TON has no data, while Polygon TPS is 41.23 tx/s
Max TPS (100 blocks)
TON has no data, while Polygon max TPS is 429.1 tx/s
Max Theoretical TPS
TON has no data, while Polygon max theoretical TPS is 714.3 tx/s
Transaction Volume
TON has no data, while Polygon transaction volume is 148,412 txns
Block Time
TON has no data, while Polygon block time is 2.13s
Finality
TON has no data, while Polygon finality is 5s
Type
TON has no data, while Polygon is a sidechain
Launch Date
TON has no data, while Polygon was launched on May 30, 2020
TON vs Polygon Decentralization New
Nakamoto Coefficient
TON has no data, while Polygon nakamoto coefficient is 4
Validators/Miners
TON has no data, while Polygon has 103 validators
Stake/Hashrate
TON has no data, while Polygon stake is 3.515B MATIC
Consensus Mechanism
TON has no data, while Polygon is PoS
Governance
TON has no data, while Polygon governance is off-chain
Other Comparisons
TON Comparisons
About Blockchains
About TON
The Open Network (TON) is a decentralized and open internet platform made up of several components. These include: TON Blockchain, TON DNS, TON Storage, and TON Sites. TON Blockchain is the core protocol that connects TON’s underlying infrastructure together to form the greater TON Ecosystem. TON is focused on achieving widespread cross-chain interoperability, while operating in a highly scalable secure framework. TON is designed to process millions of transactions per second (TPS), with the goal of eventually reaching hundreds of millions of users moving forward.
About Polygon
Polygon, formerly Matic Network, is a blockchain platform designed to establish a multi-chain system compatible with Ethereum. It employs a proof-of-stake consensus mechanism similar to Ethereum for on-chain transactions, with its native token being MATIC. Functioning as a "layer two" or "sidechain" scaling solution alongside Ethereum, Polygon facilitates quicker transactions and lower fees. Its inception aimed to tackle Ethereum's major challenges, including high fees, subpar user experience, and limited transaction throughput, aspiring to create an "Ethereum's internet of blockchains" or a multi-chain ecosystem of Ethereum-compatible blockchains.