Compare TON vs Polygon

TON vs Polygon Scalability

Real-time TPS (1H)

TON TPS is 76.12% lower than Polygon TPS

TON logo
10.58 tx/s
Polygon logo
44.33 tx/s

Data from Chainspect

Max TPS (100 blocks)

TON max TPS is 3.59X higher than Polygon max TPS

TON logo
1,542 tx/s
Polygon logo
429.1 tx/s

Data from Chainspect

Max Theoretical TPS

TON max theoretical TPS is 147X higher than Polygon max theoretical TPS

TON logo
104,715 tx/s
Polygon logo
714.3 tx/s

Data from Chainspect

Transaction Volume (1H)

TON transaction volume is 76.12% lower than Polygon transaction volume

TON logo
38.1K txns
Polygon logo
160K txns

Data from Chainspect

Block Time (1H)

TON block time is 1.34X longer than Polygon block time

TON logo
2.68s
Polygon logo
2s

Data from Chainspect

Finality

TON finality is 1.2X longer than Polygon finality

TON logo
6s
Polygon logo
5s

Data from Chainspect

Type

TON is a layer 1 blockchain, while Polygon is a sidechain

TON logo
Layer 1 blockchain
Polygon logo
Sidechain

Data from Chainspect

New

Total Transactions

TON has 53.12% fewer total transactions than Polygon

TON logo
2.69B txns
Polygon logo
5.74B txns

Data from Chainspect

Launch Date

TON was launched 1 year after Polygon

TON logo
May 26, 2021
Polygon logo
May 30, 2020

Data from Chainspect

TON vs Polygon Decentralization

Nakamoto Coefficient

TON Nakamoto Coefficient is 21X higher than Polygon Nakamoto Coefficient

TON logo
83
Polygon logo
4

Data from Chainspect

Validators

TON has 3.73X more validators than Polygon

TON logo
392
Polygon logo
105

Data from Chainspect

Stake

TON stake is 1.53X higher than Polygon stake

TON logo
$1.018B
Polygon logo
$664.2M

Data from Chainspect

Consensus Mechanism

TON and Polygon are both PoS

TON logo
Proof of Stake (PoS)
Polygon logo
Proof of Stake (PoS)

Data from Chainspect

Governance

TON on-chain governance is better than Polygon off-chain governance

TON logo
On-chain
Polygon logo
Off-chain

Data from Chainspect

TON vs Polygon Developer Activity New

Developers

TON has 67.06% fewer developers than Polygon

TON logo
546
Polygon logo
1,658

Data from Chainspect

Repos

TON has 1.11X more repos than Polygon

TON logo
166
Polygon logo
149

Data from Chainspect

Commits

TON has 67.23% fewer commits than Polygon

TON logo
20,359
Polygon logo
62,144

Data from Chainspect

Stars

TON has 1.56X more stars than Polygon

TON logo
14,365
Polygon logo
9,221

Data from Chainspect

Watchers

TON has 15.98% fewer watchers than Polygon

TON logo
1,461
Polygon logo
1,739

Data from Chainspect

TON vs Polygon Real-Time TPS Chart

Loading Data

Other Comparisons

About Blockchains

About TON

The Open Network (TON) is a decentralized and open internet platform made up of several components. These include: TON Blockchain, TON DNS, TON Storage, and TON Sites. TON Blockchain is the core protocol that connects TON’s underlying infrastructure together to form the greater TON Ecosystem. TON is focused on achieving widespread cross-chain interoperability, while operating in a highly scalable secure framework. TON is designed to process millions of transactions per second (TPS), with the goal of eventually reaching hundreds of millions of users moving forward.

About Polygon

Polygon, formerly Matic Network, is a blockchain platform designed to establish a multi-chain system compatible with Ethereum. It employs a proof-of-stake consensus mechanism similar to Ethereum for on-chain transactions, with its native token being POL. Functioning as a "layer two" or "sidechain" scaling solution alongside Ethereum, Polygon facilitates quicker transactions and lower fees. Its inception aimed to tackle Ethereum's major challenges, including high fees, subpar user experience, and limited transaction throughput, aspiring to create an "Ethereum's internet of blockchains" or a multi-chain ecosystem of Ethereum-compatible blockchains.

Blockchains Socials

TON Socials

Polygon Socials