Algorand 
Aptos 
Arbitrum 
Avalanche 
Base 
Bitcoin 
BNB Chain 
BSV Blockchain 
Cardano 
Cronos 
eCash 
Ethereum 
Etherlink 
Fogo 
Hedera 
ICP 
IoTeX 
Kaia 
Keeta Mainnet 
Keeta Testnet 
Kusama 
Moonbeam 
MultiversX 
NEAR 
Optimism 
Polkadot 
Redbelly 
Sei 
Solana 
Somnia 
Sonic 
Starknet 
Stellar 
Sui 
Tezos 
Tezos Ecosystem 
TRON 
Wanchain 
Waterfall 
Abstract 
Aurora 
Avail 
B² Network 
Babylon 
Chromia 
Cosmos 
Flare 
Gravity 
Hyperliquid 
Immutable X 
Immutable zkEVM 
Injective 
Ink 
Katana 
Kava 
Lens Chain 
Linea 
Lisk 
Manta Network 
Mantle 
MegaETH 
Metis 
Monad 
N1 
Neo 
Particle 
Plume 
RISE 
Ronin 
Skale 
Solayer 
Soon 
Supra 
Taiko 
Trac Network 
Unichain 
UPCX 
VeChain 
XDC Network 
XRP Ledger Compare TON vs Polygon
Open in ChatGPTTON vs Polygon Scalability
Real-time TPS (1H)
TON TPS is 71.61% lower than Polygon TPS
Data from Chainspect
Max TPS (100 blocks)
TON max TPS is 2.87X higher than Polygon max TPS
Data from Chainspect
Max Theoretical TPS
TON max theoretical TPS is 27X higher than Polygon max theoretical TPS
Data from Chainspect
Transaction Volume (1H)
TON transaction volume is 71.6% lower than Polygon transaction volume
Data from Chainspect
Block Time (1H)
TON block time is 73.13% shorter than Polygon block time
Data from Chainspect
Finality
TON finality is 84% shorter than Polygon finality
Data from Chainspect
Type
TON is a layer 1 blockchain, while Polygon is a sidechain
Data from Chainspect
Total Transactions (All time)
TON has 57.5% fewer total transactions than Polygon
Data from Chainspect
Launch Date
TON was launched 1 year after Polygon
Data from Chainspect
TON vs Polygon Decentralization
Nakamoto Coefficient
TON Nakamoto Coefficient is 22X higher than Polygon Nakamoto Coefficient
Data from Chainspect
Validators
TON has 3.94X more validators than Polygon
Data from Chainspect
Stake
TON stake is 3.73X higher than Polygon stake
Data from Chainspect
Consensus Mechanism
TON and Polygon are both PoS
Data from Chainspect
Governance
TON on-chain governance is better than Polygon off-chain governance
Data from Chainspect
TON vs Polygon Developer Activity
Developers
TON has 66.31% fewer developers than Polygon
Data from Chainspect
Commits
TON has 52.08% fewer commits than Polygon
Data from Chainspect
Repos
TON has 1.12X more repos than Polygon
Data from Chainspect
Stars
TON has 1.76X more stars than Polygon
Data from Chainspect
Watchers
TON has 1.26X more watchers than Polygon
Data from Chainspect
TON vs Polygon Financials New
Chain Revenue
TON chain revenue is 97.31% lower than Polygon chain revenue
Data from Chainspect
Average Transaction Fee
TON average transaction fee is 93.21% lower than Polygon average transaction fee
Data from Chainspect
Market Cap
TON market cap is 5.25X higher than Polygon market cap
Data from Chainspect
FDV
TON FDV is 10X higher than Polygon FDV
Data from Chainspect
Market Cap / FDV
TON Market Cap to FDV ratio is 47.82% lower than Polygon Market Cap to FDV ratio
Data from Chainspect
Price
TON price is 21X higher than Polygon price
Data from Chainspect
TON vs Polygon Real-time TPS Chart
Other Comparisons
TON Comparisons
About Blockchains
About TON
The Open Network (TON) is a decentralized and open internet platform made up of several components. These include: TON Blockchain, TON DNS, TON Storage, and TON Sites. TON Blockchain is the core protocol that connects TON’s underlying infrastructure together to form the greater TON Ecosystem. TON is focused on achieving widespread cross-chain interoperability, while operating in a highly scalable secure framework. TON is designed to process millions of transactions per second (TPS), with the goal of eventually reaching hundreds of millions of users moving forward.
About Polygon
Polygon, formerly Matic Network, is a blockchain platform designed to establish a multi-chain system compatible with Ethereum. It employs a proof-of-stake consensus mechanism similar to Ethereum for on-chain transactions, with its native token being POL. Functioning as a "layer two" or "sidechain" scaling solution alongside Ethereum, Polygon facilitates quicker transactions and lower fees. Its inception aimed to tackle Ethereum's major challenges, including high fees, subpar user experience, and limited transaction throughput, aspiring to create an "Ethereum's internet of blockchains" or a multi-chain ecosystem of Ethereum-compatible blockchains.