- Compare
- TON vs Arbitrum
TON vs Arbitrum
TON vs Arbitrum Scalability
Real-time TPS
TON TPS is 1.1X higher than Arbitrum TPS
Max TPS (100 blocks)
TON max TPS is 1.14X higher than Arbitrum max TPS
Max Theoretical TPS
TON max theoretical TPS is 2.62X higher than Arbitrum max theoretical TPS
Transaction Volume
TON transaction volume is 1.1X higher than Arbitrum transaction volume
Block Time
TON block time is 10X longer than Arbitrum block time
Finality
TON finality is 99.27% shorter than Arbitrum finality
Type
TON is a layer 1 blockchain, while Arbitrum is a layer 2 blockchain
Launch Date
TON was launched 3 months before Arbitrum
TON vs Arbitrum Decentralization
Nakamoto Coefficient
TON Nakamoto Coefficient is 84X higher than Arbitrum Nakamoto Coefficient
Validators
TON has 347X more validators than Arbitrum
Stake
TON stake is $1.139B, while Arbitrum has no data
Consensus Mechanism
TON is PoS, while Arbitrum is Rollup (Optimistic)
Governance
TON and Arbitrum governance are both on-chain
TON vs Arbitrum Developer Activity New
Developers
TON has 88.63% fewer developers than Arbitrum
Repos
TON has 38.88% fewer repos than Arbitrum
Commits
TON has 94.86% fewer commits than Arbitrum
Stars
TON has 1.27% fewer stars than Arbitrum
Watchers
TON has 41.51% fewer watchers than Arbitrum
TON vs Arbitrum Real-Time TPS Chart
Loading Data
Other Comparisons
TON Comparisons
About Blockchains
About TON
The Open Network (TON) is a decentralized and open internet platform made up of several components. These include: TON Blockchain, TON DNS, TON Storage, and TON Sites. TON Blockchain is the core protocol that connects TON’s underlying infrastructure together to form the greater TON Ecosystem. TON is focused on achieving widespread cross-chain interoperability, while operating in a highly scalable secure framework. TON is designed to process millions of transactions per second (TPS), with the goal of eventually reaching hundreds of millions of users moving forward.
About Arbitrum
Arbitrum serves as a Layer 2 scaling solution for Ethereum, leveraging rollups to significantly boost scalability and reduce transaction costs while maintaining robust security. It enables developers to execute EVM-compatible smart contracts with a substantially higher transaction throughput and lower fees compared to Ethereum's main chain, making it a compelling platform for decentralized application development.