Advertise on Chainspect

Compare TON vs Arbitrum

TON vs Arbitrum TPS, Transactions, Finality Time

Real-time TPS (1H)

TON TPS is 45.07% lower than Arbitrum TPS

TON logo
41.99 tx/s
Arbitrum logo
76.45 tx/s

Data from Chainspect

Max TPS (100 blocks)

TON max TPS is 24.23% lower than Arbitrum max TPS

TON logo
1,542 tx/s
Arbitrum logo
2,036 tx/s

Data from Chainspect

Theoretical TPS

TON max theoretical TPS is 17X higher than Arbitrum max theoretical TPS

TON logo
104,715 tx/s
Arbitrum logo
6,095 tx/s

Data from Chainspect

Transaction Volume (1H)

TON transaction volume is 45.07% lower than Arbitrum transaction volume

TON logo
151K txns
Arbitrum logo
275K txns

Data from Chainspect

Block Time (1H)

TON block time is 1.62X longer than Arbitrum block time

TON logo
402ms
Arbitrum logo
248ms

Data from Chainspect

Finality Time

TON finality is 99.9% shorter than Arbitrum finality

TON logo
800ms
Arbitrum logo
13m 48s

Data from Chainspect

Total Transactions (All time)

TON has 1.46X more total transactions than Arbitrum

TON logo
3.38B txns
Arbitrum logo
2.31B txns

Data from Chainspect

Launch Date

TON was launched 3 months before Arbitrum

TON logo
May 26, 2021
Arbitrum logo
Aug 31, 2021

Data from Chainspect

TON vs Arbitrum Nakamoto Coefficient

Nakamoto Coefficient

TON Nakamoto Coefficient is 86X higher than Arbitrum Nakamoto Coefficient

TON logo
86
Arbitrum logo
1

Data from Chainspect

Validators

TON has 391X more validators than Arbitrum

TON logo
391
Arbitrum logo
1

Data from Chainspect

Stake

TON stake is $866.4M, while Arbitrum has no data

TON logo
$866.4M
Arbitrum logo

Data from Chainspect

Consensus Mechanism

TON is PoS, while Arbitrum is Rollup (Optimistic)

TON logo
Proof of Stake (PoS)
Arbitrum logo
Rollup (Optimistic)

Data from Chainspect

Governance

TON and Arbitrum governance are both on-chain

TON logo
On-chain
Arbitrum logo
On-chain

Data from Chainspect

TON vs Arbitrum Developer Activity

Developers

TON has 74.8% fewer developers than Arbitrum

TON logo
620
Arbitrum logo
2,461

Data from Chainspect

Commits

TON has 83.52% fewer commits than Arbitrum

TON logo
33,056
Arbitrum logo
200,603

Data from Chainspect

Repos

TON has 1.42X more repos than Arbitrum

TON logo
188
Arbitrum logo
132

Data from Chainspect

Stars

TON has 1.57X more stars than Arbitrum

TON logo
16,983
Arbitrum logo
10,815

Data from Chainspect

Watchers

TON has 1.08X more watchers than Arbitrum

TON logo
1,599
Arbitrum logo
1,482

Data from Chainspect

TON vs Arbitrum Fees & Market Cap

On-Chain Revenue

TON on-chain revenue is 70.01% lower than Arbitrum on-chain revenue

TON logo
$2.226K
Arbitrum logo
$7.426K

Data from Chainspect

Average Transaction Fee

TON average transaction fee is 89.2% lower than Arbitrum average transaction fee

TON logo
$0.0007963
Arbitrum logo
$0.007377

Data from Chainspect

Market Cap

TON market cap is 7.23X higher than Arbitrum market cap

TON logo
$3.647B
Arbitrum logo
$504.8M

Data from Chainspect

FDV

TON FDV is 9.15X higher than Arbitrum FDV

TON logo
$6.915B
Arbitrum logo
$755.8M

Data from Chainspect

Market Cap / FDV

TON Market Cap to FDV ratio is 21.01% lower than Arbitrum Market Cap to FDV ratio

TON logo
52.75%
Arbitrum logo
66.78%

Data from Chainspect

Price

TON price is 17X higher than Arbitrum price

TON logo
$1.321
Arbitrum logo
$0.07558

Data from Chainspect

TON vs Arbitrum Real-time TPS Chart

Follow us on X for ATH alerts, TPS spikes and major announcements

Follow