Compare TON vs Arbitrum

TON vs Arbitrum Scalability

Real-time TPS (1H)

TON TPS is 25.61% lower than Arbitrum TPS

TON logo
25.75 tx/s
Arbitrum logo
34.62 tx/s

Data from Chainspect

Max TPS (100 blocks)

TON max TPS is 1.14X higher than Arbitrum max TPS

TON logo
1,542 tx/s
Arbitrum logo
1,358 tx/s

Data from Chainspect

Max Theoretical TPS

TON max theoretical TPS is 2.62X higher than Arbitrum max theoretical TPS

TON logo
104,715 tx/s
Arbitrum logo
40,000 tx/s

Data from Chainspect

Transaction Volume (1H)

TON transaction volume is 25.61% lower than Arbitrum transaction volume

TON logo
92.7K txns
Arbitrum logo
125K txns

Data from Chainspect

Block Time (1H)

TON block time is 10X longer than Arbitrum block time

TON logo
2.59s
Arbitrum logo
0.25s

Data from Chainspect

Finality

TON finality is 99.27% shorter than Arbitrum finality

TON logo
6s
Arbitrum logo
13m 48s

Data from Chainspect

Type

TON is a layer 1 blockchain, while Arbitrum is a layer 2 blockchain

TON logo
Layer 1 blockchain
Arbitrum logo
Layer 2 blockchain

Data from Chainspect

New

Total Transactions

TON has 1.7X more total transactions than Arbitrum

TON logo
2.68B txns
Arbitrum logo
1.58B txns

Data from Chainspect

Launch Date

TON was launched 3 months before Arbitrum

TON logo
May 26, 2021
Arbitrum logo
Aug 31, 2021

Data from Chainspect

TON vs Arbitrum Decentralization

Nakamoto Coefficient

TON Nakamoto Coefficient is 89X higher than Arbitrum Nakamoto Coefficient

TON logo
89
Arbitrum logo
1

Data from Chainspect

Validators

TON has 417X more validators than Arbitrum

TON logo
417
Arbitrum logo
1

Data from Chainspect

Stake

TON stake is $1.334B, while Arbitrum has no data

TON logo
$1.334B
Arbitrum logo
—

Data from Chainspect

Consensus Mechanism

TON is PoS, while Arbitrum is Rollup (Optimistic)

TON logo
Proof of Stake (PoS)
Arbitrum logo
Rollup (Optimistic)

Data from Chainspect

Governance

TON and Arbitrum governance are both on-chain

TON logo
On-chain
Arbitrum logo
On-chain

Data from Chainspect

TON vs Arbitrum Developer Activity New

Developers

TON has 76.61% fewer developers than Arbitrum

TON logo
542
Arbitrum logo
2,318

Data from Chainspect

Repos

TON has 1.32X more repos than Arbitrum

TON logo
166
Arbitrum logo
126

Data from Chainspect

Commits

TON has 89.08% fewer commits than Arbitrum

TON logo
20,207
Arbitrum logo
185,190

Data from Chainspect

Stars

TON has 1.38X more stars than Arbitrum

TON logo
14,238
Arbitrum logo
10,345

Data from Chainspect

Watchers

TON has 10.17% fewer watchers than Arbitrum

TON logo
1,457
Arbitrum logo
1,622

Data from Chainspect

TON vs Arbitrum Real-Time TPS Chart

Loading Data

Other Comparisons

About Blockchains

About TON

The Open Network (TON) is a decentralized and open internet platform made up of several components. These include: TON Blockchain, TON DNS, TON Storage, and TON Sites. TON Blockchain is the core protocol that connects TON’s underlying infrastructure together to form the greater TON Ecosystem. TON is focused on achieving widespread cross-chain interoperability, while operating in a highly scalable secure framework. TON is designed to process millions of transactions per second (TPS), with the goal of eventually reaching hundreds of millions of users moving forward.

About Arbitrum

Arbitrum serves as a Layer 2 scaling solution for Ethereum, leveraging rollups to significantly boost scalability and reduce transaction costs while maintaining robust security. It enables developers to execute EVM-compatible smart contracts with a substantially higher transaction throughput and lower fees compared to Ethereum's main chain, making it a compelling platform for decentralized application development.

Blockchains Socials

TON Socials

Arbitrum Socials