Compare TON vs Arbitrum
Open in ChatGPTTON vs Arbitrum Scalability
Real-time TPS (1H)
TON TPS is 30.82% lower than Arbitrum TPS
Data from Chainspect
Max TPS (100 blocks)
TON max TPS is 1.1X higher than Arbitrum max TPS
Data from Chainspect
Max Theoretical TPS
TON max theoretical TPS is 17X higher than Arbitrum max theoretical TPS
Data from Chainspect
Transaction Volume (1H)
TON transaction volume is 30.82% lower than Arbitrum transaction volume
Data from Chainspect
Block Time (1H)
TON block time is 11X longer than Arbitrum block time
Data from Chainspect
Finality
TON finality is 99.27% shorter than Arbitrum finality
Data from Chainspect
Type
TON is a layer 1 blockchain, while Arbitrum is a layer 2 blockchain
Data from Chainspect
Total Transactions (All time)
TON has 1.55X more total transactions than Arbitrum
Data from Chainspect
Launch Date
TON was launched 3 months before Arbitrum
Data from Chainspect
TON vs Arbitrum Decentralization
Nakamoto Coefficient
TON Nakamoto Coefficient is 80X higher than Arbitrum Nakamoto Coefficient
Data from Chainspect
Validators
TON has 375X more validators than Arbitrum
Data from Chainspect
Stake
TON stake is $653.8M, while Arbitrum has no data
Data from Chainspect
Consensus Mechanism
TON is PoS, while Arbitrum is Rollup (Optimistic)
Data from Chainspect
Governance
TON and Arbitrum governance are both on-chain
Data from Chainspect
TON vs Arbitrum Developer Activity
Developers
TON has 75.78% fewer developers than Arbitrum
Data from Chainspect
Commits
TON has 87.55% fewer commits than Arbitrum
Data from Chainspect
Repos
TON has 1.36X more repos than Arbitrum
Data from Chainspect
Stars
TON has 1.43X more stars than Arbitrum
Data from Chainspect
Watchers
TON has 6.86% fewer watchers than Arbitrum
Data from Chainspect
TON vs Arbitrum Financials New
Chain Revenue
TON chain revenue is 32.06% lower than Arbitrum chain revenue
Data from Chainspect
Average Transaction Fee
TON average transaction fee is 12.51% lower than Arbitrum average transaction fee
Data from Chainspect
Market Cap
TON market cap is 3.72X higher than Arbitrum market cap
Data from Chainspect
FDV
TON FDV is 4.54X higher than Arbitrum FDV
Data from Chainspect
Market Cap / FDV
TON Market Cap to FDV ratio is 17.93% lower than Arbitrum Market Cap to FDV ratio
Data from Chainspect
Price
TON price is 8.81X higher than Arbitrum price
Data from Chainspect
TON vs Arbitrum Real-time TPS Chart
Loading Data
Other Comparisons
TON Comparisons
About Blockchains
About TON
The Open Network (TON) is a decentralized and open internet platform made up of several components. These include: TON Blockchain, TON DNS, TON Storage, and TON Sites. TON Blockchain is the core protocol that connects TON’s underlying infrastructure together to form the greater TON Ecosystem. TON is focused on achieving widespread cross-chain interoperability, while operating in a highly scalable secure framework. TON is designed to process millions of transactions per second (TPS), with the goal of eventually reaching hundreds of millions of users moving forward.
About Arbitrum
Arbitrum serves as a Layer 2 scaling solution for Ethereum, leveraging rollups to significantly boost scalability and reduce transaction costs while maintaining robust security. It enables developers to execute EVM-compatible smart contracts with a substantially higher transaction throughput and lower fees compared to Ethereum's main chain, making it a compelling platform for decentralized application development.