Compare TON vs Polkadot Ecosystem
Open in ChatGPTTON vs Polkadot Ecosystem Scalability
Real-time TPS (1H)
TON TPS is 8.52X higher than Polkadot Ecosystem TPS
Data from Chainspect
Max TPS (100 blocks)
TON max TPS is 3.33X higher than Polkadot Ecosystem max TPS
Data from Chainspect
Max Theoretical TPS
TON max theoretical TPS is 1.05X higher than Polkadot Ecosystem max theoretical TPS
Data from Chainspect
Transaction Volume (1H)
TON transaction volume is 8.52X higher than Polkadot Ecosystem transaction volume
Data from Chainspect
Block Time (1H)
TON block time is 47.22% shorter than Polkadot Ecosystem block time
Data from Chainspect
Finality
TON finality is 80% shorter than Polkadot Ecosystem finality
Data from Chainspect
Type
TON is a layer 1 blockchain, while Polkadot Ecosystem is a blockchain ecosystem
Data from Chainspect
Total Transactions
TON has 4.15X more total transactions than Polkadot Ecosystem
Data from Chainspect
Launch Date
TON was launched 1 year after Polkadot Ecosystem
Data from Chainspect
TON vs Polkadot Ecosystem Decentralization
Nakamoto Coefficient
TON Nakamoto Coefficient is 53.37% lower than Polkadot Ecosystem Nakamoto Coefficient
Data from Chainspect
Validators
TON has 34.16% fewer validators than Polkadot Ecosystem
Data from Chainspect
Stake
TON stake is 58.12% lower than Polkadot Ecosystem stake
Data from Chainspect
Consensus Mechanism
TON is PoS, while Polkadot Ecosystem is Nominated Proof of Stake
Data from Chainspect
Governance
TON and Polkadot Ecosystem governance are both on-chain
Data from Chainspect
TON vs Polkadot Ecosystem Developer Activity
Developers
TON has 93.61% fewer developers than Polkadot Ecosystem
Data from Chainspect
Commits
TON has 96.57% fewer commits than Polkadot Ecosystem
Data from Chainspect
Repos
TON has 62.31% fewer repos than Polkadot Ecosystem
Data from Chainspect
Stars
TON has 56.02% fewer stars than Polkadot Ecosystem
Data from Chainspect
Watchers
TON has 69.97% fewer watchers than Polkadot Ecosystem
Data from Chainspect
TON vs Polkadot Ecosystem Financials New
Chain Revenue
TON chain revenue is $9.592K, while Polkadot Ecosystem has no data
Data from Chainspect
Average Transaction Fee
TON average transaction fee is $0.004657, while Polkadot Ecosystem has no data
Data from Chainspect
Market Cap
TON market cap is 1.15X higher than Polkadot Ecosystem market cap
Data from Chainspect
FDV
TON FDV is 2.42X higher than Polkadot Ecosystem FDV
Data from Chainspect
Market Cap / FDV
TON Market Cap to FDV ratio is 52.45% lower than Polkadot Ecosystem Market Cap to FDV ratio
Data from Chainspect
Price
TON price is 22.72% lower than Polkadot Ecosystem price
Data from Chainspect
TON vs Polkadot Ecosystem Real-time TPS Chart
Loading Data
Other Comparisons
TON Comparisons
About Blockchains
About TON
The Open Network (TON) is a decentralized and open internet platform made up of several components. These include: TON Blockchain, TON DNS, TON Storage, and TON Sites. TON Blockchain is the core protocol that connects TON’s underlying infrastructure together to form the greater TON Ecosystem. TON is focused on achieving widespread cross-chain interoperability, while operating in a highly scalable secure framework. TON is designed to process millions of transactions per second (TPS), with the goal of eventually reaching hundreds of millions of users moving forward.
About Polkadot Ecosystem
Polkadot stands out among other blockchain projects for its focus on enhancing the foundational infrastructure of dApps. It aims to enable interoperability between blockchain ecosystems, facilitating seamless communication without intermediaries. Functioning as a "network of networks," Polkadot utilizes parachains — specialized blockchains with unique functionalities and tokens — to enable interaction between diverse blockchain architectures. Powered by the nominated proof-of-stake (PoS) consensus algorithm and drawing inspiration from the Ouroboros protocol, Polkadot offers a robust framework for building interconnected and scalable decentralized systems.