Tempo vs Arbitrum
Tempo vs Arbitrum Scalability
Real-time TPS
Tempo has no data, while Arbitrum TPS is 28.49 tx/s
Max TPS (100 blocks)
Tempo has no data, while Arbitrum max TPS is 1,358 tx/s
Max Theoretical TPS
Tempo has no data, while Arbitrum max theoretical TPS is 40,000 tx/s
Transaction Volume
Tempo has no data, while Arbitrum transaction volume is 102,580 txns
Block Time
Tempo has no data, while Arbitrum block time is 0.25s
Finality
Tempo has no data, while Arbitrum finality is 13m 48s
Type
Tempo has no data, while Arbitrum is a layer 2 blockchain
Launch Date
Tempo has no data, while Arbitrum was launched on Aug 31, 2021
Tempo vs Arbitrum Decentralization New
Nakamoto Coefficient
Tempo has no data, while Arbitrum Nakamoto Coefficient is 1
Validators/Miners
Tempo has no data, while Arbitrum has 1 validators
Stake/Hashrate
Tempo and Arbitrum have no data
Consensus Mechanism
Tempo has no data, while Arbitrum is Rollup (Optimistic)
Governance
Tempo has no data, while Arbitrum governance is on-chain
Other Comparisons
Tempo Comparisons
About Blockchains
About Tempo
Tempo is a purpose-built, layer 1 blockchain for payments, developed in partnership with leading fintechs and Fortune 500s. With support for all major stablecoins, Tempo enables high-throughput, low-cost global transactions for any business use case.
About Arbitrum
Arbitrum serves as a Layer 2 scaling solution for Ethereum, leveraging rollups to significantly boost scalability and reduce transaction costs while maintaining robust security. It enables developers to execute EVM-compatible smart contracts with a substantially higher transaction throughput and lower fees compared to Ethereum's main chain, making it a compelling platform for decentralized application development.