Tempo vs Polygon
Tempo vs Polygon Scalability
Real-time TPS
Tempo has no data, while Polygon TPS is 47.92 tx/s
Max TPS (100 blocks)
Tempo has no data, while Polygon max TPS is 429.1 tx/s
Max Theoretical TPS
Tempo has no data, while Polygon max theoretical TPS is 714.3 tx/s
Transaction Volume
Tempo has no data, while Polygon transaction volume is 172,498 txns
Block Time
Tempo has no data, while Polygon block time is 2.12s
Finality
Tempo has no data, while Polygon finality is 5s
Type
Tempo has no data, while Polygon is a sidechain
Launch Date
Tempo has no data, while Polygon was launched on May 30, 2020
Tempo vs Polygon Decentralization New
Nakamoto Coefficient
Tempo has no data, while Polygon Nakamoto Coefficient is 4
Validators/Miners
Tempo has no data, while Polygon has 105 validators
Stake/Hashrate
Tempo has no data, while Polygon stake is $809.8M
Consensus Mechanism
Tempo has no data, while Polygon is PoS
Governance
Tempo has no data, while Polygon governance is off-chain
Other Comparisons
Tempo Comparisons
About Blockchains
About Tempo
Tempo is a purpose-built, layer 1 blockchain for payments, developed in partnership with leading fintechs and Fortune 500s. With support for all major stablecoins, Tempo enables high-throughput, low-cost global transactions for any business use case.
About Polygon
Polygon, formerly Matic Network, is a blockchain platform designed to establish a multi-chain system compatible with Ethereum. It employs a proof-of-stake consensus mechanism similar to Ethereum for on-chain transactions, with its native token being POL. Functioning as a "layer two" or "sidechain" scaling solution alongside Ethereum, Polygon facilitates quicker transactions and lower fees. Its inception aimed to tackle Ethereum's major challenges, including high fees, subpar user experience, and limited transaction throughput, aspiring to create an "Ethereum's internet of blockchains" or a multi-chain ecosystem of Ethereum-compatible blockchains.