- Compare
- Shape vs Arbitrum
Shape vs Arbitrum Scalability
Real-time TPS
Shape has no data, while Arbitrum TPS is 32.16 tx/s
Max TPS (100 blocks)
Shape has no data, while Arbitrum max TPS is 1,358 tx/s
Max Theoretical TPS
Shape has no data, while Arbitrum max theoretical TPS is 40,000 tx/s
Transaction Volume
Shape has no data, while Arbitrum transaction volume is 115,781 txns
Block Time
Shape has no data, while Arbitrum block time is 0.25s
Finality
Shape has no data, while Arbitrum finality is 13m 48s
Type
Shape has no data, while Arbitrum is a layer 2 blockchain
Launch Date
Shape has no data, while Arbitrum was launched on Aug 31, 2021
Shape vs Arbitrum Decentralization New
Nakamoto Coefficient
Shape has no data, while Arbitrum Nakamoto Coefficient is 1
Validators/Miners
Shape has no data, while Arbitrum has 1 validators
Stake/Hashrate
Shape and Arbitrum have no data
Consensus Mechanism
Shape has no data, while Arbitrum is Rollup (Optimistic)
Governance
Shape has no data, while Arbitrum governance is on-chain
Other Comparisons
Shape Comparisons
About Blockchains
About Shape
Shape is the culture-first L2 built on top of Ethereum to power the new NFT economy
About Arbitrum
Arbitrum serves as a Layer 2 scaling solution for Ethereum, leveraging rollups to significantly boost scalability and reduce transaction costs while maintaining robust security. It enables developers to execute EVM-compatible smart contracts with a substantially higher transaction throughput and lower fees compared to Ethereum's main chain, making it a compelling platform for decentralized application development.