- Compare
- QFnetwork vs Arbitrum
QFnetwork vs Arbitrum Scalability
Real-time TPS
QFnetwork has no data, while Arbitrum TPS is 34.85 tx/s
Max TPS (100 blocks)
QFnetwork has no data, while Arbitrum max TPS is 1,105 tx/s
Max Theoretical TPS
QFnetwork has no data, while Arbitrum max theoretical TPS is 40,000 tx/s
Transaction Volume
QFnetwork has no data, while Arbitrum transaction volume is 125,458 txns
Block Time
QFnetwork has no data, while Arbitrum block time is 0.25s
Finality
QFnetwork has no data, while Arbitrum finality is 13m 48s
Type
QFnetwork has no data, while Arbitrum is a layer 2 blockchain
Launch Date
QFnetwork has no data, while Arbitrum was launched on Aug 31, 2021
QFnetwork vs Arbitrum Decentralization New
Nakamoto Coefficient
QFnetwork has no data, while Arbitrum Nakamoto Coefficient is 1
Validators/Miners
QFnetwork has no data, while Arbitrum has 1 validators
Stake/Hashrate
QFnetwork and Arbitrum have no data
Consensus Mechanism
QFnetwork has no data, while Arbitrum is Rollup (Optimistic)
Governance
QFnetwork has no data, while Arbitrum governance is on-chain
Other Comparisons
QFnetwork Comparisons
About Blockchains
About QFnetwork
QFnetwork merges cutting-edge technologies to revolutionize blockchain, by integrating advanced consensus protocols, parallel execution, innovative storage solutions and more. Delivering unparalleled speed, scalability, and developer-friendly tools. QF network is here to break the barriers that have held dApps back from mass adoption.
About Arbitrum
Arbitrum serves as a Layer 2 scaling solution for Ethereum, leveraging rollups to significantly boost scalability and reduce transaction costs while maintaining robust security. It enables developers to execute EVM-compatible smart contracts with a substantially higher transaction throughput and lower fees compared to Ethereum's main chain, making it a compelling platform for decentralized application development.