NitroGraph vs Arbitrum Scalability
Real-time TPS
NitroGraph has no data, while Arbitrum TPS is 28.18 tx/s
Max TPS (100 blocks)
NitroGraph has no data, while Arbitrum max TPS is 1,358 tx/s
Max Theoretical TPS
NitroGraph has no data, while Arbitrum max theoretical TPS is 40,000 tx/s
Transaction Volume
NitroGraph has no data, while Arbitrum transaction volume is 101,444 txns
Block Time
NitroGraph has no data, while Arbitrum block time is 0.25s
Finality
NitroGraph has no data, while Arbitrum finality is 13m 48s
Type
NitroGraph has no data, while Arbitrum is a layer 2 blockchain
Launch Date
NitroGraph has no data, while Arbitrum was launched on Aug 31, 2021
NitroGraph vs Arbitrum Decentralization New
Nakamoto Coefficient
NitroGraph has no data, while Arbitrum Nakamoto Coefficient is 1
Validators/Miners
NitroGraph has no data, while Arbitrum has 1 validators
Stake/Hashrate
NitroGraph and Arbitrum have no data
Consensus Mechanism
NitroGraph has no data, while Arbitrum is Rollup (Optimistic)
Governance
NitroGraph has no data, while Arbitrum governance is on-chain
Other Comparisons
NitroGraph Comparisons
About Blockchains
About NitroGraph
NitroGraph is the execution layer for AI agents. Built for teams who want to own their models, deploy autonomous agents, and monetize AI at scale.
About Arbitrum
Arbitrum serves as a Layer 2 scaling solution for Ethereum, leveraging rollups to significantly boost scalability and reduce transaction costs while maintaining robust security. It enables developers to execute EVM-compatible smart contracts with a substantially higher transaction throughput and lower fees compared to Ethereum's main chain, making it a compelling platform for decentralized application development.