Algorand 
Aptos 
Arbitrum 
Avalanche 
Bitcoin 
BNB Chain 
BSV Blockchain 
Cardano 
Cronos 
eCash 
Ethereum 
Etherlink 
Fogo 
Hedera 
ICP 
IoTeX 
Kaia 
Keeta Mainnet 
Keeta Testnet 
Kusama 
MultiversX 
NEAR 
Optimism 
Polkadot 
Polygon 
Redbelly 
Sei 
Solana 
Somnia 
Sonic 
Starknet 
Stellar 
Sui 
Tezos 
Tezos Ecosystem 
TON 
TRON 
Wanchain 
Waterfall 
Abstract 
Aurora 
Avail 
B² Network 
Babylon 
Chromia 
Cosmos 
Flare 
Gravity 
Hyperliquid 
Immutable X 
Immutable zkEVM 
Injective 
Ink 
Katana 
Kava 
Lens Chain 
Linea 
Lisk 
Manta Network 
Mantle 
MegaETH 
Metis 
Monad 
N1 
Neo 
Particle 
Plume 
RISE 
Ronin 
Skale 
Solayer 
Soon 
Supra 
Taiko 
Trac Network 
Unichain 
UPCX 
VeChain 
XDC Network 
XRP Ledger Compare Moonbeam vs Base
Open in ChatGPTMoonbeam vs Base Scalability
Real-time TPS (1H)
Moonbeam TPS is 99.71% lower than Base TPS
Data from Chainspect
Max TPS (100 blocks)
Moonbeam max TPS is 98.83% lower than Base max TPS
Data from Chainspect
Max Theoretical TPS
Moonbeam max theoretical TPS is 98.36% lower than Base max theoretical TPS
Data from Chainspect
Transaction Volume (1H)
Moonbeam transaction volume is 99.71% lower than Base transaction volume
Data from Chainspect
Block Time (1H)
Moonbeam block time is 3.17X longer than Base block time
Data from Chainspect
Finality
Moonbeam finality is 96.21% shorter than Base finality
Data from Chainspect
Type
Moonbeam is a parachain, while Base is a layer 2 blockchain
Data from Chainspect
Total Transactions (All time)
Moonbeam has 98.65% fewer total transactions than Base
Data from Chainspect
Launch Date
Moonbeam was launched 2 years before Base
Data from Chainspect
Moonbeam vs Base Decentralization
Nakamoto Coefficient
Moonbeam Nakamoto Coefficient is 11X higher than Base Nakamoto Coefficient
Data from Chainspect
Validators
Moonbeam has 56X more validators than Base
Data from Chainspect
Stake
Moonbeam stake is $1.405M, while Base has no data
Data from Chainspect
Consensus Mechanism
Moonbeam is Nominated Proof of Stake, while Base is Rollup (Optimistic)
Data from Chainspect
Governance
Moonbeam on-chain governance is better than Base off-chain governance
Data from Chainspect
Moonbeam vs Base Developer Activity
Developers
Moonbeam has 84.92% fewer developers than Base
Data from Chainspect
Commits
Moonbeam has 33.83% fewer commits than Base
Data from Chainspect
Repos
Moonbeam has 57.53% fewer repos than Base
Data from Chainspect
Stars
Moonbeam has 98.21% fewer stars than Base
Data from Chainspect
Watchers
Moonbeam has 84.62% fewer watchers than Base
Data from Chainspect
Moonbeam vs Base Financials New
Chain Revenue
Moonbeam chain revenue is 99.96% lower than Base chain revenue
Data from Chainspect
Average Transaction Fee
Moonbeam average transaction fee is 84.35% lower than Base average transaction fee
Data from Chainspect
Market Cap
Moonbeam market cap is $10.39M, while Base has no data
Data from Chainspect
FDV
Moonbeam FDV is $10.84M, while Base has no data
Data from Chainspect
Market Cap / FDV
Moonbeam Market Cap to FDV ratio is 95.86%, while Base has no data
Data from Chainspect
Price
Moonbeam price is $0.008735, while Base has no data
Data from Chainspect
Moonbeam vs Base Real-time TPS Chart
Other Comparisons
Moonbeam Comparisons
About Blockchains
About Moonbeam
Moonbeam is an EVM-compatible smart contracts platform built in the Polkadot ecosystem. It's designed for seamless compatibility with Ethereum tooling to provide a user-friendly environment for porting existing and developing new dApps. Also, as the biggest Polkadot parachain Moonbeam encourages cross-chain communication with other parachains.
About Base
Base, an Ethereum-based blockchain developed by Coinbase, operates as a Layer 2 (L2) network, leveraging Optimism to provide a secure, cost-effective, and user-friendly environment for decentralized application (dApp) development. With a mission to onboard the next billion users to web3, Base ensures near-zero fees, quick transactions, and robust security supported by Ethereum's infrastructure. At its launch, Base had over 100 dApps and service providers, aiming to solve the blockchain trilemma by prioritizing interoperability and composability among participating rollups. This approach enhances scalability while preserving security and decentralization.