- Compare
- Interlay vs Arbitrum
Interlay vs Arbitrum Scalability
Real-time TPS
Interlay has no data, while Arbitrum TPS is 28.36 tx/s
Max TPS (100 blocks)
Interlay has no data, while Arbitrum max TPS is 1,358 tx/s
Max Theoretical TPS
Interlay has no data, while Arbitrum max theoretical TPS is 40,000 tx/s
Transaction Volume
Interlay has no data, while Arbitrum transaction volume is 102,097 txns
Block Time
Interlay has no data, while Arbitrum block time is 0.25s
Finality
Interlay has no data, while Arbitrum finality is 13m 48s
Type
Interlay has no data, while Arbitrum is a layer 2 blockchain
Launch Date
Interlay has no data, while Arbitrum was launched on Aug 31, 2021
Interlay vs Arbitrum Decentralization New
Nakamoto Coefficient
Interlay has no data, while Arbitrum Nakamoto Coefficient is 1
Validators/Miners
Interlay has no data, while Arbitrum has 1 validators
Stake/Hashrate
Interlay and Arbitrum have no data
Consensus Mechanism
Interlay has no data, while Arbitrum is Rollup (Optimistic)
Governance
Interlay has no data, while Arbitrum governance is on-chain
Other Comparisons
Interlay Comparisons
About Blockchains
About Interlay
Interlay is a modular, programmable layer between Bitcoin and the multi-chain ecosystem that unlocks novel decentralized use cases for BTC.
About Arbitrum
Arbitrum serves as a Layer 2 scaling solution for Ethereum, leveraging rollups to significantly boost scalability and reduce transaction costs while maintaining robust security. It enables developers to execute EVM-compatible smart contracts with a substantially higher transaction throughput and lower fees compared to Ethereum's main chain, making it a compelling platform for decentralized application development.