Fraxtal vs Arbitrum Scalability
Real-time TPS
Fraxtal has no data, while Arbitrum TPS is 31.59 tx/s
Max TPS (100 blocks)
Fraxtal has no data, while Arbitrum max TPS is 1,358 tx/s
Max Theoretical TPS
Fraxtal has no data, while Arbitrum max theoretical TPS is 40,000 tx/s
Transaction Volume
Fraxtal has no data, while Arbitrum transaction volume is 113,718 txns
Block Time
Fraxtal has no data, while Arbitrum block time is 0.25s
Finality
Fraxtal has no data, while Arbitrum finality is 13m 48s
Type
Fraxtal has no data, while Arbitrum is a layer 2 blockchain
Launch Date
Fraxtal has no data, while Arbitrum was launched on Aug 31, 2021
Fraxtal vs Arbitrum Decentralization New
Nakamoto Coefficient
Fraxtal has no data, while Arbitrum Nakamoto Coefficient is 1
Validators/Miners
Fraxtal has no data, while Arbitrum has 1 validators
Stake/Hashrate
Fraxtal and Arbitrum have no data
Consensus Mechanism
Fraxtal has no data, while Arbitrum is Rollup (Optimistic)
Governance
Fraxtal has no data, while Arbitrum governance is on-chain
Other Comparisons
Fraxtal Comparisons
About Blockchains
About Fraxtal
A high-performance EVM Layer 1 blockchain designed for extreme scalability, minimal fees, and Ethereum-level security, with plans for real-time blocks and 100k+ TPS.
About Arbitrum
Arbitrum serves as a Layer 2 scaling solution for Ethereum, leveraging rollups to significantly boost scalability and reduce transaction costs while maintaining robust security. It enables developers to execute EVM-compatible smart contracts with a substantially higher transaction throughput and lower fees compared to Ethereum's main chain, making it a compelling platform for decentralized application development.