Centrifuge Chain vs Arbitrum Scalability
Real-time TPS
Centrifuge Chain has no data, while Arbitrum TPS is 28.6 tx/s
Max TPS (100 blocks)
Centrifuge Chain has no data, while Arbitrum max TPS is 1,358 tx/s
Max Theoretical TPS
Centrifuge Chain has no data, while Arbitrum max theoretical TPS is 40,000 tx/s
Transaction Volume
Centrifuge Chain has no data, while Arbitrum transaction volume is 102,956 txns
Block Time
Centrifuge Chain has no data, while Arbitrum block time is 0.25s
Finality
Centrifuge Chain has no data, while Arbitrum finality is 13m 48s
Type
Centrifuge Chain has no data, while Arbitrum is a layer 2 blockchain
Launch Date
Centrifuge Chain has no data, while Arbitrum was launched on Aug 31, 2021
Centrifuge Chain vs Arbitrum Decentralization New
Nakamoto Coefficient
Centrifuge Chain has no data, while Arbitrum Nakamoto Coefficient is 1
Validators/Miners
Centrifuge Chain has no data, while Arbitrum has 1 validators
Stake/Hashrate
Centrifuge Chain and Arbitrum have no data
Consensus Mechanism
Centrifuge Chain has no data, while Arbitrum is Rollup (Optimistic)
Governance
Centrifuge Chain has no data, while Arbitrum governance is on-chain
Other Comparisons
Centrifuge Chain Comparisons
About Blockchains
About Centrifuge Chain
Centrifuge is the infrastructure that facilitates the decentralized financing of real-world assets natively on-chain, creating a fully transparent market which allows borrowers and lenders to transact without unnecessary intermediaries.
About Arbitrum
Arbitrum serves as a Layer 2 scaling solution for Ethereum, leveraging rollups to significantly boost scalability and reduce transaction costs while maintaining robust security. It enables developers to execute EVM-compatible smart contracts with a substantially higher transaction throughput and lower fees compared to Ethereum's main chain, making it a compelling platform for decentralized application development.