Compare Polygon vs Moonbeam
Open in ChatGPTPolygon vs Moonbeam Scalability
Real-time TPS (1H)
Polygon TPS is 218X higher than Moonbeam TPS
Data from Chainspect
Max TPS (100 blocks)
Polygon max TPS is 18X higher than Moonbeam max TPS
Data from Chainspect
Max Theoretical TPS
Polygon max theoretical TPS is 57X higher than Moonbeam max theoretical TPS
Data from Chainspect
Transaction Volume (1H)
Polygon transaction volume is 218X higher than Moonbeam transaction volume
Data from Chainspect
Block Time (1H)
Polygon block time is 73.77% shorter than Moonbeam block time
Data from Chainspect
Finality
Polygon finality is 83.33% shorter than Moonbeam finality
Data from Chainspect
Type
Polygon is a sidechain, while Moonbeam is a parachain
Data from Chainspect
Total Transactions (All time)
Polygon has 82X more total transactions than Moonbeam
Data from Chainspect
Launch Date
Polygon was launched 2 years before Moonbeam
Data from Chainspect
Polygon vs Moonbeam Decentralization
Nakamoto Coefficient
Polygon Nakamoto Coefficient is 76.47% lower than Moonbeam Nakamoto Coefficient
Data from Chainspect
Validators
Polygon has 1.38X more validators than Moonbeam
Data from Chainspect
Stake
Polygon stake is 115X higher than Moonbeam stake
Data from Chainspect
Consensus Mechanism
Polygon is PoS, while Moonbeam is Nominated Proof of Stake
Data from Chainspect
Governance
Polygon off-chain governance is worse than Moonbeam on-chain governance
Data from Chainspect
Polygon vs Moonbeam Developer Activity
Developers
Polygon has 8.17X more developers than Moonbeam
Data from Chainspect
Commits
Polygon has 4.48X more commits than Moonbeam
Data from Chainspect
Repos
Polygon has 5.39X more repos than Moonbeam
Data from Chainspect
Stars
Polygon has 6.75X more stars than Moonbeam
Data from Chainspect
Watchers
Polygon has 9.97X more watchers than Moonbeam
Data from Chainspect
Polygon vs Moonbeam Financials New
Chain Revenue
Polygon chain revenue is 15,807X higher than Moonbeam chain revenue
Data from Chainspect
Average Transaction Fee
Polygon average transaction fee is 91X higher than Moonbeam average transaction fee
Data from Chainspect
Market Cap
Polygon market cap is 69X higher than Moonbeam market cap
Data from Chainspect
FDV
Polygon FDV is 65X higher than Moonbeam FDV
Data from Chainspect
Market Cap / FDV
Polygon Market Cap to FDV ratio is 1.06X higher than Moonbeam Market Cap to FDV ratio
Data from Chainspect
Price
Polygon price is 7.56X higher than Moonbeam price
Data from Chainspect
Polygon vs Moonbeam Real-time TPS Chart
Loading Data
Other Comparisons
Polygon Comparisons
About Blockchains
About Polygon
Polygon, formerly Matic Network, is a blockchain platform designed to establish a multi-chain system compatible with Ethereum. It employs a proof-of-stake consensus mechanism similar to Ethereum for on-chain transactions, with its native token being POL. Functioning as a "layer two" or "sidechain" scaling solution alongside Ethereum, Polygon facilitates quicker transactions and lower fees. Its inception aimed to tackle Ethereum's major challenges, including high fees, subpar user experience, and limited transaction throughput, aspiring to create an "Ethereum's internet of blockchains" or a multi-chain ecosystem of Ethereum-compatible blockchains.
About Moonbeam
Moonbeam is an EVM-compatible smart contracts platform built in the Polkadot ecosystem. It's designed for seamless compatibility with Ethereum tooling to provide a user-friendly environment for porting existing and developing new dApps. Also, as the biggest Polkadot parachain Moonbeam encourages cross-chain communication with other parachains.