Compare Polygon vs Polkadot
Open in ChatGPTPolygon vs Polkadot Scalability
Real-time TPS (1H)
Polygon TPS is 100% higher than Polkadot TPS
Data from Chainspect
Max TPS (100 blocks)
Polygon max TPS is 1.16X higher than Polkadot max TPS
Data from Chainspect
Max Theoretical TPS
Polygon max theoretical TPS is 2.38X higher than Polkadot max theoretical TPS
Data from Chainspect
Transaction Volume (1H)
Polygon transaction volume is 100% higher than Polkadot transaction volume
Data from Chainspect
Block Time (1H)
Polygon block time is 70.9% shorter than Polkadot block time
Data from Chainspect
Finality
Polygon finality is 83.33% shorter than Polkadot finality
Data from Chainspect
Type
Polygon is a sidechain, while Polkadot is a layer 1 blockchain
Data from Chainspect
Total Transactions (All time)
Polygon has 157X more total transactions than Polkadot
Data from Chainspect
Launch Date
Polygon was launched 4 days after Polkadot
Data from Chainspect
Polygon vs Polkadot Decentralization
Nakamoto Coefficient
Polygon Nakamoto Coefficient is 97.75% lower than Polkadot Nakamoto Coefficient
Data from Chainspect
Validators
Polygon has 82.83% fewer validators than Polkadot
Data from Chainspect
Stake
Polygon stake is 66.85% lower than Polkadot stake
Data from Chainspect
Consensus Mechanism
Polygon is PoS, while Polkadot is Nominated Proof of Stake
Data from Chainspect
Governance
Polygon off-chain governance is worse than Polkadot on-chain governance
Data from Chainspect
Polygon vs Polkadot Developer Activity
Developers
Polygon has 80.1% fewer developers than Polkadot
Data from Chainspect
Commits
Polygon has 90.56% fewer commits than Polkadot
Data from Chainspect
Repos
Polygon has 67.19% fewer repos than Polkadot
Data from Chainspect
Stars
Polygon has 73.22% fewer stars than Polkadot
Data from Chainspect
Watchers
Polygon has 67.08% fewer watchers than Polkadot
Data from Chainspect
Polygon vs Polkadot Financials New
Chain Revenue
Polygon chain revenue is 919,315X higher than Polkadot chain revenue
Data from Chainspect
Average Transaction Fee
Polygon average transaction fee is 68.04% lower than Polkadot average transaction fee
Data from Chainspect
Market Cap
Polygon market cap is 51.46% lower than Polkadot market cap
Data from Chainspect
FDV
Polygon FDV is 61.11% lower than Polkadot FDV
Data from Chainspect
Market Cap / FDV
Polygon Market Cap to FDV ratio is 1.25X higher than Polkadot Market Cap to FDV ratio
Data from Chainspect
Price
Polygon price is 92.32% lower than Polkadot price
Data from Chainspect
Polygon vs Polkadot Real-time TPS Chart
Loading Data
Other Comparisons
Polygon Comparisons
About Blockchains
About Polygon
Polygon, formerly Matic Network, is a blockchain platform designed to establish a multi-chain system compatible with Ethereum. It employs a proof-of-stake consensus mechanism similar to Ethereum for on-chain transactions, with its native token being POL. Functioning as a "layer two" or "sidechain" scaling solution alongside Ethereum, Polygon facilitates quicker transactions and lower fees. Its inception aimed to tackle Ethereum's major challenges, including high fees, subpar user experience, and limited transaction throughput, aspiring to create an "Ethereum's internet of blockchains" or a multi-chain ecosystem of Ethereum-compatible blockchains.
About Polkadot
Polkadot stands out among other blockchain projects for its focus on enhancing the foundational infrastructure of dApps. It aims to enable interoperability between blockchain ecosystems, facilitating seamless communication without intermediaries. Functioning as a "network of networks," Polkadot utilizes parachains — specialized blockchains with unique functionalities and tokens — to enable interaction between diverse blockchain architectures. Powered by the nominated proof-of-stake (PoS) consensus algorithm and drawing inspiration from the Ouroboros protocol, Polkadot offers a robust framework for building interconnected and scalable decentralized systems.