Compare Polkadot Ecosystem vs Arbitrum
Polkadot Ecosystem vs Arbitrum Scalability
Real-time TPS (1H)
Polkadot Ecosystem TPS is 83.11% lower than Arbitrum TPS
Data from Chainspect
Max TPS (100 blocks)
Polkadot Ecosystem max TPS is 65.93% lower than Arbitrum max TPS
Data from Chainspect
Max Theoretical TPS
Polkadot Ecosystem max theoretical TPS is 2.5X higher than Arbitrum max theoretical TPS
Data from Chainspect
Transaction Volume (1H)
Polkadot Ecosystem transaction volume is 83.11% lower than Arbitrum transaction volume
Data from Chainspect
Block Time (1H)
Polkadot Ecosystem block time is 24X longer than Arbitrum block time
Data from Chainspect
Finality
Polkadot Ecosystem finality is 96.37% shorter than Arbitrum finality
Data from Chainspect
Type
Polkadot Ecosystem is a blockchain ecosystem, while Arbitrum is a layer 2 blockchain
Data from Chainspect
Total Transactions
Polkadot Ecosystem has 60.46% fewer total transactions than Arbitrum
Data from Chainspect
Launch Date
Polkadot Ecosystem was launched 1 year before Arbitrum
Data from Chainspect
Polkadot Ecosystem vs Arbitrum Decentralization
Nakamoto Coefficient
Polkadot Ecosystem Nakamoto Coefficient is 178X higher than Arbitrum Nakamoto Coefficient
Data from Chainspect
Validators
Polkadot Ecosystem has 600X more validators than Arbitrum
Data from Chainspect
Stake
Polkadot Ecosystem stake is $2.214B, while Arbitrum has no data
Data from Chainspect
Consensus Mechanism
Polkadot Ecosystem is Nominated Proof of Stake, while Arbitrum is Rollup (Optimistic)
Data from Chainspect
Governance
Polkadot Ecosystem and Arbitrum governance are both on-chain
Data from Chainspect
Polkadot Ecosystem vs Arbitrum Developer Activity
Developers
Polkadot Ecosystem has 3.82X more developers than Arbitrum
Data from Chainspect
Repos
Polkadot Ecosystem has 3.62X more repos than Arbitrum
Data from Chainspect
Commits
Polkadot Ecosystem has 3.59X more commits than Arbitrum
Data from Chainspect
Stars
Polkadot Ecosystem has 3.25X more stars than Arbitrum
Data from Chainspect
Watchers
Polkadot Ecosystem has 3.09X more watchers than Arbitrum
Data from Chainspect
Polkadot Ecosystem vs Arbitrum Financials New
Chain Revenue
Polkadot Ecosystem has no data, while Arbitrum chain revenue is $29.55K
Data from Chainspect
Average Transaction Fee
Polkadot Ecosystem has no data, while Arbitrum average transaction fee is $0.01077
Data from Chainspect
Price
Polkadot Ecosystem price is 10X higher than Arbitrum price
Data from Chainspect
Market Cap
Polkadot Ecosystem market cap is 2.98X higher than Arbitrum market cap
Data from Chainspect
Polkadot Ecosystem vs Arbitrum Real-Time TPS Chart
Loading Data
Other Comparisons
Polkadot Ecosystem Comparisons
About Blockchains
About Polkadot Ecosystem
Polkadot stands out among other blockchain projects for its focus on enhancing the foundational infrastructure of dApps. It aims to enable interoperability between blockchain ecosystems, facilitating seamless communication without intermediaries. Functioning as a "network of networks," Polkadot utilizes parachains — specialized blockchains with unique functionalities and tokens — to enable interaction between diverse blockchain architectures. Powered by the nominated proof-of-stake (PoS) consensus algorithm and drawing inspiration from the Ouroboros protocol, Polkadot offers a robust framework for building interconnected and scalable decentralized systems.
About Arbitrum
Arbitrum serves as a Layer 2 scaling solution for Ethereum, leveraging rollups to significantly boost scalability and reduce transaction costs while maintaining robust security. It enables developers to execute EVM-compatible smart contracts with a substantially higher transaction throughput and lower fees compared to Ethereum's main chain, making it a compelling platform for decentralized application development.