Compare opBNB vs Sonic
Open in ChatGPTopBNB vs Sonic Scalability
Real-time TPS (1H)
opBNB TPS is 14X higher than Sonic TPS
Data from Chainspect
Max TPS (100 blocks)
opBNB max TPS is 51.88% lower than Sonic max TPS
Data from Chainspect
Max Theoretical TPS
opBNB max theoretical TPS is 98.8% lower than Sonic max theoretical TPS
Data from Chainspect
Transaction Volume (1H)
opBNB transaction volume is 14X higher than Sonic transaction volume
Data from Chainspect
Block Time (1H)
opBNB block time is 36.41% shorter than Sonic block time
Data from Chainspect
Finality
opBNB finality is 100% longer than Sonic finality
Data from Chainspect
Type
opBNB is a layer 2 blockchain, while Sonic is a layer 1 blockchain
Data from Chainspect
Total Transactions (All time)
opBNB has 24X more total transactions than Sonic
Data from Chainspect
Launch Date
opBNB was launched 1 year before Sonic
Data from Chainspect
opBNB vs Sonic Decentralization
Nakamoto Coefficient
opBNB Nakamoto Coefficient is 80% lower than Sonic Nakamoto Coefficient
Data from Chainspect
Validators
opBNB has 97.5% fewer validators than Sonic
Data from Chainspect
Stake
opBNB has no data, while Sonic stake is $89.83M
Data from Chainspect
Consensus Mechanism
opBNB is Rollup (Optimistic), while Sonic is PoS
Data from Chainspect
Governance
opBNB off-chain governance is worse than Sonic on-chain governance
Data from Chainspect
opBNB vs Sonic Developer Activity
Developers
opBNB has 37X more developers than Sonic
Data from Chainspect
Commits
opBNB has 12X more commits than Sonic
Data from Chainspect
Repos
opBNB has 11X more repos than Sonic
Data from Chainspect
Stars
opBNB has 171X more stars than Sonic
Data from Chainspect
Watchers
opBNB has 20X more watchers than Sonic
Data from Chainspect
opBNB vs Sonic Financials New
Chain Revenue
opBNB chain revenue is 32.74% lower than Sonic chain revenue
Data from Chainspect
Average Transaction Fee
opBNB average transaction fee is 93.59% lower than Sonic average transaction fee
Data from Chainspect
Market Cap
opBNB has no data, while Sonic market cap is $215.3M
Data from Chainspect
FDV
opBNB has no data, while Sonic FDV is $240.9M
Data from Chainspect
Market Cap / FDV
opBNB has no data, while Sonic Market Cap to FDV ratio is 89.37%
Data from Chainspect
Price
opBNB has no data, while Sonic price is $0.07477
Data from Chainspect
opBNB vs Sonic Real-time TPS Chart
Loading Data
Other Comparisons
opBNB Comparisons
About Blockchains
About opBNB
opBNB is an optimistic rollup network designed to enhance the scalability of the Binance Smart Chain (BSC). It aims to take the workload away from the mainnet and improve network performance. The opBNB network employs a unique approach to ensure transaction integrity and security. It leverages the main network (BSC) for final transaction validation on its execution layer, facilitated by a verifier mechanism, striving to achieve high throughput while maintaining security.
About Sonic
Sonic is the highest-performing EVM layer-1 blockchain, combining speed, incentives, and world-class infrastructure, powering the next generation of DeFi applications. The chain provides 400,000 TPS and sub-second finality.
By combining a novel consensus mechanism with full EVM compatibility, Sonic delivers unparalleled speed, security, and scalability. The S token is Sonic's native token, used for paying transaction fees, staking, running validators, and participating in governance.