opBNB vs Polygon Scalability
Real-time TPS
opBNB TPS is 12.82% lower than Polygon TPS
Max TPS (100 blocks)
opBNB max TPS is 1.28X higher than Polygon max TPS
Max Theoretical TPS
opBNB max theoretical TPS is 6.67X higher than Polygon max theoretical TPS
Transaction Volume
opBNB transaction volume is 12.82% lower than Polygon transaction volume
Block Time
opBNB block time is 76.47% shorter than Polygon block time
Finality
opBNB finality is 12X longer than Polygon finality
Type
opBNB is a layer 2 blockchain, while Polygon is a sidechain
Launch Date
opBNB was launched 3 years after Polygon
opBNB vs Polygon Decentralization New
Nakamoto Coefficient
opBNB Nakamoto Coefficient is 75% lower than Polygon Nakamoto Coefficient
Validators
opBNB has 99.04% fewer validators than Polygon
Stake
opBNB has no data, while Polygon stake is $809.8M
Consensus Mechanism
opBNB is Rollup (Optimistic), while Polygon is PoS
Governance
opBNB and Polygon governance are both off-chain
opBNB vs Polygon Real-Time TPS Chart
Loading Data
Other Comparisons
opBNB Comparisons
About Blockchains
About opBNB
opBNB is an optimistic rollup network designed to enhance the scalability of the Binance Smart Chain (BSC). It aims to take the workload away from the mainnet and improve network performance. The opBNB network employs a unique approach to ensure transaction integrity and security. It leverages the main network (BSC) for final transaction validation on its execution layer, facilitated by a verifier mechanism, striving to achieve high throughput while maintaining security.
About Polygon
Polygon, formerly Matic Network, is a blockchain platform designed to establish a multi-chain system compatible with Ethereum. It employs a proof-of-stake consensus mechanism similar to Ethereum for on-chain transactions, with its native token being POL. Functioning as a "layer two" or "sidechain" scaling solution alongside Ethereum, Polygon facilitates quicker transactions and lower fees. Its inception aimed to tackle Ethereum's major challenges, including high fees, subpar user experience, and limited transaction throughput, aspiring to create an "Ethereum's internet of blockchains" or a multi-chain ecosystem of Ethereum-compatible blockchains.