Sonic vs Polygon
Sonic vs Polygon Scalability
Real-time TPS
Sonic TPS is 93.47% lower than Polygon TPS
Max TPS (100 blocks)
Sonic max TPS is 2.65X higher than Polygon max TPS
Max Theoretical TPS
Sonic max theoretical TPS is 556X higher than Polygon max theoretical TPS
Transaction Volume
Sonic transaction volume is 93.47% lower than Polygon transaction volume
Block Time
Sonic block time is 59% shorter than Polygon block time
Finality
Sonic finality is 100% shorter than Polygon finality
Type
Sonic is a layer 1 blockchain, while Polygon is a sidechain
Launch Date
Sonic was launched 5 years after Polygon
Sonic vs Polygon Decentralization New
Nakamoto Coefficient
Sonic Nakamoto Coefficient is the same as Polygon Nakamoto Coefficient
Validators
Sonic has 60.95% fewer validators than Polygon
Stake
Sonic stake is 49.63% lower than Polygon stake
Consensus Mechanism
Sonic and Polygon are both PoS
Governance
Sonic on-chain governance is better than Polygon off-chain governance
Sonic vs Polygon Real-Time TPS Chart
Loading Data
Other Comparisons
Sonic Comparisons
About Blockchains
About Sonic
Sonic is the highest-performing EVM layer-1 blockchain, combining speed, incentives, and world-class infrastructure, powering the next generation of DeFi applications. The chain provides 400,000 TPS and sub-second finality.
By combining a novel consensus mechanism with full EVM compatibility, Sonic delivers unparalleled speed, security, and scalability. The S token is Sonic's native token, used for paying transaction fees, staking, running validators, and participating in governance.
About Polygon
Polygon, formerly Matic Network, is a blockchain platform designed to establish a multi-chain system compatible with Ethereum. It employs a proof-of-stake consensus mechanism similar to Ethereum for on-chain transactions, with its native token being POL. Functioning as a "layer two" or "sidechain" scaling solution alongside Ethereum, Polygon facilitates quicker transactions and lower fees. Its inception aimed to tackle Ethereum's major challenges, including high fees, subpar user experience, and limited transaction throughput, aspiring to create an "Ethereum's internet of blockchains" or a multi-chain ecosystem of Ethereum-compatible blockchains.