Compare Sonic vs Polygon
Open in ChatGPTSonic vs Polygon Scalability
Real-time TPS (1H)
Sonic TPS is 97.02% lower than Polygon TPS
Data from Chainspect
Max TPS (100 blocks)
Sonic max TPS is 2.12X higher than Polygon max TPS
Data from Chainspect
Max Theoretical TPS
Sonic max theoretical TPS is 556X higher than Polygon max theoretical TPS
Data from Chainspect
Transaction Volume (1H)
Sonic transaction volume is 97.02% lower than Polygon transaction volume
Data from Chainspect
Block Time (1H)
Sonic block time is 46.55% shorter than Polygon block time
Data from Chainspect
Finality
Sonic finality is 100% shorter than Polygon finality
Data from Chainspect
Type
Sonic is a layer 1 blockchain, while Polygon is a sidechain
Data from Chainspect
Total Transactions (All time)
Sonic has 97.25% fewer total transactions than Polygon
Data from Chainspect
Launch Date
Sonic was launched 5 years after Polygon
Data from Chainspect
Sonic vs Polygon Decentralization
Nakamoto Coefficient
Sonic Nakamoto Coefficient is 1.25X higher than Polygon Nakamoto Coefficient
Data from Chainspect
Validators
Sonic has 61.9% fewer validators than Polygon
Data from Chainspect
Stake
Sonic stake is 80.97% lower than Polygon stake
Data from Chainspect
Consensus Mechanism
Sonic and Polygon are both PoS
Data from Chainspect
Governance
Sonic on-chain governance is better than Polygon off-chain governance
Data from Chainspect
Sonic vs Polygon Developer Activity
Developers
Sonic has 93.95% fewer developers than Polygon
Data from Chainspect
Commits
Sonic has 77.7% fewer commits than Polygon
Data from Chainspect
Repos
Sonic has 91.08% fewer repos than Polygon
Data from Chainspect
Stars
Sonic has 99.11% fewer stars than Polygon
Data from Chainspect
Watchers
Sonic has 95.1% fewer watchers than Polygon
Data from Chainspect
Sonic vs Polygon Financials New
Chain Revenue
Sonic chain revenue is 99.4% lower than Polygon chain revenue
Data from Chainspect
Average Transaction Fee
Sonic average transaction fee is 83.33% lower than Polygon average transaction fee
Data from Chainspect
Market Cap
Sonic market cap is 85.12% lower than Polygon market cap
Data from Chainspect
FDV
Sonic FDV is 83.35% lower than Polygon FDV
Data from Chainspect
Market Cap / FDV
Sonic Market Cap to FDV ratio is 10.63% lower than Polygon Market Cap to FDV ratio
Data from Chainspect
Price
Sonic price is 45.43% lower than Polygon price
Data from Chainspect
Sonic vs Polygon Real-time TPS Chart
Loading Data
Other Comparisons
Sonic Comparisons
About Blockchains
About Sonic
Sonic is the highest-performing EVM layer-1 blockchain, combining speed, incentives, and world-class infrastructure, powering the next generation of DeFi applications. The chain provides 400,000 TPS and sub-second finality.
By combining a novel consensus mechanism with full EVM compatibility, Sonic delivers unparalleled speed, security, and scalability. The S token is Sonic's native token, used for paying transaction fees, staking, running validators, and participating in governance.
About Polygon
Polygon, formerly Matic Network, is a blockchain platform designed to establish a multi-chain system compatible with Ethereum. It employs a proof-of-stake consensus mechanism similar to Ethereum for on-chain transactions, with its native token being POL. Functioning as a "layer two" or "sidechain" scaling solution alongside Ethereum, Polygon facilitates quicker transactions and lower fees. Its inception aimed to tackle Ethereum's major challenges, including high fees, subpar user experience, and limited transaction throughput, aspiring to create an "Ethereum's internet of blockchains" or a multi-chain ecosystem of Ethereum-compatible blockchains.