- Compare
- opBNB vs Arbitrum
opBNB vs Arbitrum Scalability
Real-time TPS
opBNB TPS is 10.95% lower than Arbitrum TPS
Max TPS (100 blocks)
opBNB max TPS is 59.64% lower than Arbitrum max TPS
Max Theoretical TPS
opBNB max theoretical TPS is 88.09% lower than Arbitrum max theoretical TPS
Transaction Volume
opBNB transaction volume is 10.95% lower than Arbitrum transaction volume
Block Time
opBNB block time is 2X longer than Arbitrum block time
Finality
opBNB finality is 92.51% shorter than Arbitrum finality
Type
opBNB and Arbitrum are both layer 2 blockchains
Launch Date
opBNB was launched 2 years after Arbitrum
opBNB vs Arbitrum Decentralization New
Nakamoto Coefficient
opBNB Nakamoto Coefficient is the same as Arbitrum Nakamoto Coefficient
Validators
opBNB and Arbitrum have the same amount of validators
Stake
opBNB and Arbitrum have no data
Consensus Mechanism
opBNB and Arbitrum are both Rollup (Optimistic)
Governance
opBNB off-chain governance is worse than Arbitrum on-chain governance
opBNB vs Arbitrum Real-Time TPS Chart
Loading Data
Other Comparisons
opBNB Comparisons
About Blockchains
About opBNB
opBNB is an optimistic rollup network designed to enhance the scalability of the Binance Smart Chain (BSC). It aims to take the workload away from the mainnet and improve network performance. The opBNB network employs a unique approach to ensure transaction integrity and security. It leverages the main network (BSC) for final transaction validation on its execution layer, facilitated by a verifier mechanism, striving to achieve high throughput while maintaining security.
About Arbitrum
Arbitrum serves as a Layer 2 scaling solution for Ethereum, leveraging rollups to significantly boost scalability and reduce transaction costs while maintaining robust security. It enables developers to execute EVM-compatible smart contracts with a substantially higher transaction throughput and lower fees compared to Ethereum's main chain, making it a compelling platform for decentralized application development.