Real-time TPS
ICP TPS is 69X more than Arbitrum TPS
Max TPS (100 blocks)
ICP max TPS is 23X more than Arbitrum max TPS
Max Theoretical TPS
ICP max theoretical TPS is 5.24X more than Arbitrum max theoretical TPS
Transaction Volume
ICP transaction volume is 69X more than Arbitrum transaction volume
Block Time
ICP block time is 1.92X more than Arbitrum block time
Finality
ICP finality is 100% less than Arbitrum finality
Nakamoto Coefficient
ICP and Arbitrum nakamoto coefficient are both coming soon
Active Addresses
ICP and Arbitrum active addresses are both coming soon
Governance
ICP and Arbitrum governance are both on-chain
Type
ICP is a layer 1 blockchain, while Arbitrum is a layer 2 blockchain
Launch Date
ICP was launched 4 months before Arbitrum
ICP vs Arbitrum Real-Time TPS Chart
Loading Data
Other Comparisons
ICP Comparisons
About Blockchains
About ICP
The Internet Computer enables you to build anything without traditional IT and Big Tech. It hosts decentralized serverless compute that’s simpler, immune to cyber attack, unstoppable, and controllable by DAOs. Next-generation smart contracts (named Canisters) that hold both code and state enable truly Decentralized AI. Canisters use Chain Fusion technology to write transctions directly to other chains without centralized bridges, enabling secure multi-chain dapps. Build social, defi, games, e-commerce, enterprise or any kind of application or service on ICP. The internet is evolving.
About Arbitrum
Arbitrum serves as a Layer 2 scaling solution for Ethereum, leveraging rollups to significantly boost scalability and reduce transaction costs while maintaining robust security. It enables developers to execute EVM-compatible smart contracts with a substantially higher transaction throughput and lower fees compared to Ethereum's main chain, making it a compelling platform for decentralized application development.