Compare ICP vs Arbitrum

ICP vs Arbitrum Scalability

Real-time TPS (1H)

ICP TPS is 45X higher than Arbitrum TPS

ICP logo
1,063 tx/s
Arbitrum logo
23.61 tx/s

Data from Chainspect

Max TPS (100 blocks)

ICP max TPS is 19X higher than Arbitrum max TPS

ICP logo
25,621 tx/s
Arbitrum logo
1,358 tx/s

Data from Chainspect

Max Theoretical TPS

ICP max theoretical TPS is 34X higher than Arbitrum max theoretical TPS

ICP logo
209,708 tx/s
Arbitrum logo
6,095 tx/s

Data from Chainspect

Transaction Volume (1H)

ICP transaction volume is 45X higher than Arbitrum transaction volume

ICP logo
3.83M txns
Arbitrum logo
85K txns

Data from Chainspect

Block Time (1H)

ICP block time is 1.92X longer than Arbitrum block time

ICP logo
0.48s
Arbitrum logo
0.25s

Data from Chainspect

Finality

ICP finality is 100% shorter than Arbitrum finality

ICP logo
0s
Arbitrum logo
13m 48s

Data from Chainspect

Type

ICP is a layer 1 blockchain, while Arbitrum is a layer 2 blockchain

ICP logo
Layer 1 blockchain
Arbitrum logo
Layer 2 blockchain

Data from Chainspect

New

Total Transactions

ICP has 155X more total transactions than Arbitrum

ICP logo
264B txns
Arbitrum logo
1.7B txns

Data from Chainspect

Launch Date

ICP was launched 4 months before Arbitrum

ICP logo
May 10, 2021
Arbitrum logo
Aug 31, 2021

Data from Chainspect

ICP vs Arbitrum Decentralization

Nakamoto Coefficient

ICP Nakamoto Coefficient is 14X higher than Arbitrum Nakamoto Coefficient

ICP logo
14
Arbitrum logo
1

Data from Chainspect

Validators

ICP has 701X more validators than Arbitrum

ICP logo
701
Arbitrum logo
1

Data from Chainspect

Stake

ICP stake is $1.3B, while Arbitrum has no data

ICP logo
$1.3B
Arbitrum logo

Data from Chainspect

Consensus Mechanism

ICP is Proof of Useful Work, while Arbitrum is Rollup (Optimistic)

ICP logo
Proof of Useful Work
Arbitrum logo
Rollup (Optimistic)

Data from Chainspect

Governance

ICP and Arbitrum governance are both on-chain

ICP logo
On-chain
Arbitrum logo
On-chain

Data from Chainspect

ICP vs Arbitrum Developer Activity

Developers

ICP has 67.67% fewer developers than Arbitrum

ICP logo
762
Arbitrum logo
2,357

Data from Chainspect

Repos

ICP has 1.42X more repos than Arbitrum

ICP logo
182
Arbitrum logo
128

Data from Chainspect

Commits

ICP has 37.78% fewer commits than Arbitrum

ICP logo
117,503
Arbitrum logo
188,865

Data from Chainspect

Stars

ICP has 11.03% fewer stars than Arbitrum

ICP logo
9,317
Arbitrum logo
10,473

Data from Chainspect

Watchers

ICP has 1.33X more watchers than Arbitrum

ICP logo
2,153
Arbitrum logo
1,619

Data from Chainspect

ICP vs Arbitrum Financials New

Chain Revenue

ICP chain revenue is 57.37% lower than Arbitrum chain revenue

ICP logo
$26.17K
Arbitrum logo
$61.4K

Data from Chainspect

Average Transaction Fee

ICP average transaction fee is 98.66% lower than Arbitrum average transaction fee

ICP logo
$0.0002806
Arbitrum logo
$0.02099

Data from Chainspect

Price

ICP price is 22X higher than Arbitrum price

ICP logo
$5.451
Arbitrum logo
$0.2428

Data from Chainspect

Market Cap

ICP market cap is 2.2X higher than Arbitrum market cap

ICP logo
$2.947B
Arbitrum logo
$1.338B

Data from Chainspect

ICP vs Arbitrum Real-Time TPS Chart

Loading Data

Other Comparisons

About Blockchains

About ICP

The Internet Computer is a decentralized cloud blockchain that pursues the $1+ trillion cloud market — hosting apps, websites and enterprise systems, fully onchain, where they benefit from extraordinary security and resilience, can do multi-chain token processing, and can be administered in a decentralized way for safety.

A core purpose is “self-writing cloud”, where AI creates apps for mass market users, which are sophisticated and secure, in response to instructions they provide over chat.

The ICP token is burned powering onchain apps, and is a cryptocurrency used in network governance staking.

It’s easy to try — use AI to create onchain apps (e.g. caffeine.ai) or use an online IDE to write serverless code yourself (e.g. icp.ninja)!

About Arbitrum

Arbitrum serves as a Layer 2 scaling solution for Ethereum, leveraging rollups to significantly boost scalability and reduce transaction costs while maintaining robust security. It enables developers to execute EVM-compatible smart contracts with a substantially higher transaction throughput and lower fees compared to Ethereum's main chain, making it a compelling platform for decentralized application development.

Blockchains Socials

ICP Socials

Arbitrum Socials