Enjin vs Arbitrum
Enjin vs Arbitrum Scalability
Real-time TPS
Enjin has no data, while Arbitrum TPS is 28.49 tx/s
Max TPS (100 blocks)
Enjin has no data, while Arbitrum max TPS is 1,358 tx/s
Max Theoretical TPS
Enjin has no data, while Arbitrum max theoretical TPS is 40,000 tx/s
Transaction Volume
Enjin has no data, while Arbitrum transaction volume is 102,580 txns
Block Time
Enjin has no data, while Arbitrum block time is 0.25s
Finality
Enjin has no data, while Arbitrum finality is 13m 48s
Type
Enjin has no data, while Arbitrum is a layer 2 blockchain
Launch Date
Enjin has no data, while Arbitrum was launched on Aug 31, 2021
Enjin vs Arbitrum Decentralization New
Nakamoto Coefficient
Enjin has no data, while Arbitrum Nakamoto Coefficient is 1
Validators/Miners
Enjin has no data, while Arbitrum has 1 validators
Stake/Hashrate
Enjin and Arbitrum have no data
Consensus Mechanism
Enjin has no data, while Arbitrum is Rollup (Optimistic)
Governance
Enjin has no data, while Arbitrum governance is on-chain
Other Comparisons
Enjin Comparisons
About Blockchains
About Enjin
Enjin is the world’s most advanced end-to-end product ecosystem that makes it easy to develop, trade, monetize, and market Web3 games.
About Arbitrum
Arbitrum serves as a Layer 2 scaling solution for Ethereum, leveraging rollups to significantly boost scalability and reduce transaction costs while maintaining robust security. It enables developers to execute EVM-compatible smart contracts with a substantially higher transaction throughput and lower fees compared to Ethereum's main chain, making it a compelling platform for decentralized application development.