ApeChain vs Polygon Scalability
Real-time TPS
ApeChain has no data, while Polygon TPS is 36.23 tx/s
Max TPS (100 blocks)
ApeChain has no data, while Polygon max TPS is 429.1 tx/s
Max Theoretical TPS
ApeChain has no data, while Polygon max theoretical TPS is 714.3 tx/s
Transaction Volume
ApeChain has no data, while Polygon transaction volume is 130,431 txns
Block Time
ApeChain has no data, while Polygon block time is 2.13s
Finality
ApeChain has no data, while Polygon finality is 5s
Type
ApeChain has no data, while Polygon is a sidechain
Launch Date
ApeChain has no data, while Polygon was launched on May 30, 2020
ApeChain vs Polygon Decentralization New
Nakamoto Coefficient
ApeChain has no data, while Polygon Nakamoto Coefficient is 4
Validators/Miners
ApeChain has no data, while Polygon has 104 validators
Stake/Hashrate
ApeChain has no data, while Polygon stake is $836M
Consensus Mechanism
ApeChain has no data, while Polygon is PoS
Governance
ApeChain has no data, while Polygon governance is off-chain
Other Comparisons
ApeChain Comparisons
About Blockchains
About ApeChain
ApeChain provides developers and users with the best possible experience on the blockchain by focusing on ecosystem discovery, unique web3 rails, and top of funnel exposure.
ApeChain is a dedicated infrastructure layer to power the ApeCoin ecosystem. ApeChain utilizes $APE as its native gas token. This integration significantly enhances $APE's utility, fostering a robust and dynamic economy driven by $APE, and positioning ApeChain as a premier platform.
ApeChain at its core is an Arbitrum Orbit chain.
About Polygon
Polygon, formerly Matic Network, is a blockchain platform designed to establish a multi-chain system compatible with Ethereum. It employs a proof-of-stake consensus mechanism similar to Ethereum for on-chain transactions, with its native token being POL. Functioning as a "layer two" or "sidechain" scaling solution alongside Ethereum, Polygon facilitates quicker transactions and lower fees. Its inception aimed to tackle Ethereum's major challenges, including high fees, subpar user experience, and limited transaction throughput, aspiring to create an "Ethereum's internet of blockchains" or a multi-chain ecosystem of Ethereum-compatible blockchains.