Real-time TPS
Acala TPS is coming soon, while Polygon TPS is 39.77 tx/s
Max TPS (100 blocks)
Acala max TPS is coming soon, while Polygon max TPS is 429.1 tx/s
Max Theoretical TPS
Acala max theoretical TPS is coming soon, while Polygon max theoretical TPS is 714.3 tx/s
Transaction Volume
Acala transaction volume is coming soon, while Polygon transaction volume is 143,184 txns
Block Time
Acala block time is coming soon, while Polygon block time is 2.14s
Finality
Acala finality is coming soon, while Polygon finality is 4m 16s
Nakamoto Coefficient
Acala and Polygon nakamoto coefficient are both coming soon
Active Addresses
Acala and Polygon active addresses are both coming soon
Governance
Acala governance is coming soon, while Polygon governance is off-chain
Type
Acala type is unknown, while Polygon is a layer 2 blockchain
Launch Date
The Acala launch date is unknown, while Polygon was launched on May 30, 2020
Other Comparisons
Acala Comparisons
- Acala vs Acala
- Acala vs Ajuna
- Acala vs Astar
- Acala vs Bifrost
- Acala vs Crust
- Acala vs Frequency
- Acala vs Hydration
- Acala vs Integritee
- Acala vs Litentry
- Acala vs Mythos
- Acala vs Moonbeam
- Acala vs NeuroWeb
- Acala vs peaq
- Acala vs Pendulum
- Acala vs Phala Network
- Acala vs Robonomics
- Acala vs Polkadot Ecosystem
- Acala vs Zeitgeist
About Blockchains
About Acala
Acala is the all-in-one DeFi hub of Polkadot. Acala is an Ethereum-compatible platform for financial applications to use smart contracts or built-in protocols with out-of-the-box cross-chain capabilities and robust security.
About Polygon
Polygon, formerly Matic Network, is a blockchain platform designed to establish a multi-chain system compatible with Ethereum. It employs a proof-of-stake consensus mechanism similar to Ethereum for on-chain transactions, with its native token being MATIC. Functioning as a "layer two" or "sidechain" scaling solution alongside Ethereum, Polygon facilitates quicker transactions and lower fees. Its inception aimed to tackle Ethereum's major challenges, including high fees, subpar user experience, and limited transaction throughput, aspiring to create an "Ethereum's internet of blockchains" or a multi-chain ecosystem of Ethereum-compatible blockchains.