Acala vs Polygon Scalability
Real-time TPS
Acala has no data, while Polygon TPS is 39.52 tx/s
Max TPS (100 blocks)
Acala has no data, while Polygon max TPS is 429.1 tx/s
Max Theoretical TPS
Acala has no data, while Polygon max theoretical TPS is 714.3 tx/s
Transaction Volume
Acala has no data, while Polygon transaction volume is 142,255 txns
Block Time
Acala has no data, while Polygon block time is 2.13s
Finality
Acala has no data, while Polygon finality is 5s
Type
Acala has no data, while Polygon is a sidechain
Launch Date
Acala has no data, while Polygon was launched on May 30, 2020
Acala vs Polygon Decentralization New
Nakamoto Coefficient
Acala has no data, while Polygon Nakamoto Coefficient is 4
Validators/Miners
Acala has no data, while Polygon has 103 validators
Stake/Hashrate
Acala has no data, while Polygon stake is 3.505B MATIC
Consensus Mechanism
Acala has no data, while Polygon is PoS
Governance
Acala has no data, while Polygon governance is off-chain
Other Comparisons
Acala Comparisons
About Blockchains
About Acala
Acala is the all-in-one DeFi hub of Polkadot. Acala is an Ethereum-compatible platform for financial applications to use smart contracts or built-in protocols with out-of-the-box cross-chain capabilities and robust security.
About Polygon
Polygon, formerly Matic Network, is a blockchain platform designed to establish a multi-chain system compatible with Ethereum. It employs a proof-of-stake consensus mechanism similar to Ethereum for on-chain transactions, with its native token being MATIC. Functioning as a "layer two" or "sidechain" scaling solution alongside Ethereum, Polygon facilitates quicker transactions and lower fees. Its inception aimed to tackle Ethereum's major challenges, including high fees, subpar user experience, and limited transaction throughput, aspiring to create an "Ethereum's internet of blockchains" or a multi-chain ecosystem of Ethereum-compatible blockchains.