Acala vs Arbitrum Scalability
Real-time TPS
Acala has no data, while Arbitrum TPS is 42.85 tx/s
Max TPS (100 blocks)
Acala has no data, while Arbitrum max TPS is 1,105 tx/s
Max Theoretical TPS
Acala has no data, while Arbitrum max theoretical TPS is 40,000 tx/s
Transaction Volume
Acala has no data, while Arbitrum transaction volume is 154,268 txns
Block Time
Acala has no data, while Arbitrum block time is 0.25s
Finality
Acala has no data, while Arbitrum finality is 13m 48s
Type
Acala has no data, while Arbitrum is a layer 2 blockchain
Launch Date
Acala has no data, while Arbitrum was launched on Aug 31, 2021
Acala vs Arbitrum Decentralization New
Nakamoto Coefficient
Acala has no data, while Arbitrum Nakamoto Coefficient is 1
Validators/Miners
Acala has no data, while Arbitrum has 1 validators
Stake/Hashrate
Acala and Arbitrum have no data
Consensus Mechanism
Acala has no data, while Arbitrum is Rollup (Optimistic)
Governance
Acala has no data, while Arbitrum governance is on-chain
Other Comparisons
Acala Comparisons
About Blockchains
About Acala
Acala is the all-in-one DeFi hub of Polkadot. Acala is an Ethereum-compatible platform for financial applications to use smart contracts or built-in protocols with out-of-the-box cross-chain capabilities and robust security.
About Arbitrum
Arbitrum serves as a Layer 2 scaling solution for Ethereum, leveraging rollups to significantly boost scalability and reduce transaction costs while maintaining robust security. It enables developers to execute EVM-compatible smart contracts with a substantially higher transaction throughput and lower fees compared to Ethereum's main chain, making it a compelling platform for decentralized application development.