Compare Acala vs Arbitrum

Acala vs Arbitrum Scalability

Real-time TPS (1H)

Acala has no data, while Arbitrum TPS is 23.19 tx/s

Acala logo
Arbitrum logo
23.19 tx/s

Data from Chainspect

Max TPS (100 blocks)

Acala has no data, while Arbitrum max TPS is 1,402 tx/s

Acala logo
Arbitrum logo
1,402 tx/s

Data from Chainspect

Max Theoretical TPS

Acala has no data, while Arbitrum max theoretical TPS is 6,095 tx/s

Acala logo
Arbitrum logo
6,095 tx/s

Data from Chainspect

Transaction Volume (1H)

Acala has no data, while Arbitrum transaction volume is 83.5K txns

Acala logo
Arbitrum logo
83.5K txns

Data from Chainspect

Block Time (1H)

Acala has no data, while Arbitrum block time is 0.25s

Acala logo
Arbitrum logo
0.25s

Data from Chainspect

Finality

Acala has no data, while Arbitrum finality is 13m 48s

Acala logo
Arbitrum logo
13m 48s

Data from Chainspect

Type

Acala has no data, while Arbitrum is a layer 2 blockchain

Acala logo
Arbitrum logo
Layer 2 blockchain

Data from Chainspect

New

Total Transactions

Acala has no data, while Arbitrum has 1.7B total transactions

Acala logo
Arbitrum logo
1.7B txns

Data from Chainspect

Launch Date

Acala has no data, while Arbitrum was launched on Aug 31, 2021

Acala logo
Arbitrum logo
Aug 31, 2021

Data from Chainspect

Acala vs Arbitrum Decentralization

Nakamoto Coefficient

Acala has no data, while Arbitrum Nakamoto Coefficient is 1

Acala logo
Arbitrum logo
1

Data from Chainspect

Validators/Miners

Acala has no data, while Arbitrum has 1 validators

Acala logo
Arbitrum logo
1

Data from Chainspect

Stake/Hashrate

Acala and Arbitrum have no data

Acala logo
Arbitrum logo

Data from Chainspect

Consensus Mechanism

Acala has no data, while Arbitrum is Rollup (Optimistic)

Acala logo
Arbitrum logo
Rollup (Optimistic)

Data from Chainspect

Governance

Acala has no data, while Arbitrum governance is on-chain

Acala logo
Arbitrum logo
On-chain

Data from Chainspect

Acala vs Arbitrum Developer Activity

Developers

Acala has no data, while Arbitrum has 2,357 developers

Acala logo
Arbitrum logo
2,357

Data from Chainspect

Repos

Acala has no data, while Arbitrum has 128 repos

Acala logo
Arbitrum logo
128

Data from Chainspect

Commits

Acala has no data, while Arbitrum has 188,865 commits

Acala logo
Arbitrum logo
188,865

Data from Chainspect

Stars

Acala has no data, while Arbitrum has 10,473 stars

Acala logo
Arbitrum logo
10,473

Data from Chainspect

Watchers

Acala has no data, while Arbitrum has 1,619 watchers

Acala logo
Arbitrum logo
1,619

Data from Chainspect

Acala vs Arbitrum Financials New

Chain Revenue

Acala has no data, while Arbitrum chain revenue is $33.03K

Acala logo
Arbitrum logo
$33.03K

Data from Chainspect

Average Transaction Fee

Acala has no data, while Arbitrum average transaction fee is $0.01365

Acala logo
Arbitrum logo
$0.01365

Data from Chainspect

Price

Acala has no data, while Arbitrum price is $0.2361

Acala logo
Arbitrum logo
$0.2361

Data from Chainspect

Market Cap

Acala has no data, while Arbitrum market cap is $1.301B

Acala logo
Arbitrum logo
$1.301B

Data from Chainspect

Other Comparisons

About Blockchains

About Acala

Acala is the all-in-one DeFi hub of Polkadot. Acala is an Ethereum-compatible platform for financial applications to use smart contracts or built-in protocols with out-of-the-box cross-chain capabilities and robust security.

About Arbitrum

Arbitrum serves as a Layer 2 scaling solution for Ethereum, leveraging rollups to significantly boost scalability and reduce transaction costs while maintaining robust security. It enables developers to execute EVM-compatible smart contracts with a substantially higher transaction throughput and lower fees compared to Ethereum's main chain, making it a compelling platform for decentralized application development.

Blockchains Socials

Acala Socials

Arbitrum Socials