Compare Acala vs Arbitrum
Open in ChatGPTAcala vs Arbitrum Scalability
Real-time TPS (1H)
Acala has no data, while Arbitrum TPS is 42.67 tx/s
Data from Chainspect
Max TPS (100 blocks)
Acala has no data, while Arbitrum max TPS is 1,402 tx/s
Data from Chainspect
Max Theoretical TPS
Acala has no data, while Arbitrum max theoretical TPS is 6,095 tx/s
Data from Chainspect
Transaction Volume (1H)
Acala has no data, while Arbitrum transaction volume is 154K txns
Data from Chainspect
Block Time (1H)
Acala has no data, while Arbitrum block time is 0.25s
Data from Chainspect
Finality
Acala has no data, while Arbitrum finality is 13m 48s
Data from Chainspect
Type
Acala has no data, while Arbitrum is a layer 2 blockchain
Data from Chainspect
Total Transactions
Acala has no data, while Arbitrum has 1.77B total transactions
Data from Chainspect
Launch Date
Acala has no data, while Arbitrum was launched on Aug 31, 2021
Data from Chainspect
Acala vs Arbitrum Decentralization
Nakamoto Coefficient
Acala has no data, while Arbitrum Nakamoto Coefficient is 1
Data from Chainspect
Validators/Miners
Acala has no data, while Arbitrum has 1 validators
Data from Chainspect
Stake/Hashrate
Acala and Arbitrum have no data
Data from Chainspect
Consensus Mechanism
Acala has no data, while Arbitrum is Rollup (Optimistic)
Data from Chainspect
Governance
Acala has no data, while Arbitrum governance is on-chain
Data from Chainspect
Acala vs Arbitrum Developer Activity
Developers
Acala has no data, while Arbitrum has 2,365 developers
Data from Chainspect
Commits
Acala has no data, while Arbitrum has 189,593 commits
Data from Chainspect
Repos
Acala has no data, while Arbitrum has 129 repos
Data from Chainspect
Stars
Acala has no data, while Arbitrum has 10,540 stars
Data from Chainspect
Watchers
Acala has no data, while Arbitrum has 1,618 watchers
Data from Chainspect
Acala vs Arbitrum Financials New
Chain Revenue
Acala has no data, while Arbitrum chain revenue is $21.96K
Data from Chainspect
Average Transaction Fee
Acala has no data, while Arbitrum average transaction fee is $0.005402
Data from Chainspect
Market Cap
Acala has no data, while Arbitrum market cap is $1.157B
Data from Chainspect
FDV
Acala has no data, while Arbitrum FDV is $2.059B
Data from Chainspect
Market Cap / FDV
Acala has no data, while Arbitrum Market Cap to FDV ratio is 56.18%
Data from Chainspect
Price
Acala has no data, while Arbitrum price is $0.2059
Data from Chainspect
Other Comparisons
Acala Comparisons
About Blockchains
About Acala
Acala is the all-in-one DeFi hub of Polkadot. Acala is an Ethereum-compatible platform for financial applications to use smart contracts or built-in protocols with out-of-the-box cross-chain capabilities and robust security.
About Arbitrum
Arbitrum serves as a Layer 2 scaling solution for Ethereum, leveraging rollups to significantly boost scalability and reduce transaction costs while maintaining robust security. It enables developers to execute EVM-compatible smart contracts with a substantially higher transaction throughput and lower fees compared to Ethereum's main chain, making it a compelling platform for decentralized application development.