Compare Acala vs BNB Chain

Acala vs BNB Chain Scalability

Real-time TPS (1H)

Acala has no data, while BNB Chain TPS is 232.4 tx/s

Acala logo
BNB Chain logo
232.4 tx/s

Data from Chainspect

Max TPS (100 blocks)

Acala has no data, while BNB Chain max TPS is 2,545 tx/s

Acala logo
BNB Chain logo
2,545 tx/s

Data from Chainspect

Max Theoretical TPS

Acala has no data, while BNB Chain max theoretical TPS is 2,222 tx/s

Acala logo
BNB Chain logo
2,222 tx/s

Data from Chainspect

Transaction Volume (1H)

Acala has no data, while BNB Chain transaction volume is 837K txns

Acala logo
BNB Chain logo
837K txns

Data from Chainspect

Block Time (1H)

Acala has no data, while BNB Chain block time is 0.75s

Acala logo
BNB Chain logo
0.75s

Data from Chainspect

Finality

Acala has no data, while BNB Chain finality is 2s

Acala logo
BNB Chain logo
2s

Data from Chainspect

Type

Acala has no data, while BNB Chain is a layer 1 blockchain

Acala logo
BNB Chain logo
Layer 1 blockchain

Data from Chainspect

New

Total Transactions

Acala has no data, while BNB Chain has 9.81B total transactions

Acala logo
BNB Chain logo
9.81B txns

Data from Chainspect

Launch Date

Acala has no data, while BNB Chain was launched on Sep 1, 2020

Acala logo
BNB Chain logo
Sep 1, 2020

Data from Chainspect

Acala vs BNB Chain Decentralization

Nakamoto Coefficient

Acala has no data, while BNB Chain Nakamoto Coefficient is 7

Acala logo
BNB Chain logo
7

Data from Chainspect

Validators/Miners

Acala has no data, while BNB Chain has 45 validators

Acala logo
BNB Chain logo
45

Data from Chainspect

Stake/Hashrate

Acala has no data, while BNB Chain stake is $28.3B

Acala logo
BNB Chain logo
$28.3B

Data from Chainspect

Consensus Mechanism

Acala has no data, while BNB Chain is Proof of Staked Authority

Acala logo
BNB Chain logo
Proof of Staked Authority

Data from Chainspect

Governance

Acala has no data, while BNB Chain governance is on-chain

Acala logo
BNB Chain logo
On-chain

Data from Chainspect

Acala vs BNB Chain Developer Activity

Developers

Acala has no data, while BNB Chain has 3,798 developers

Acala logo
BNB Chain logo
3,798

Data from Chainspect

Repos

Acala has no data, while BNB Chain has 144 repos

Acala logo
BNB Chain logo
144

Data from Chainspect

Commits

Acala has no data, while BNB Chain has 166,040 commits

Acala logo
BNB Chain logo
166,040

Data from Chainspect

Stars

Acala has no data, while BNB Chain has 13,677 stars

Acala logo
BNB Chain logo
13,677

Data from Chainspect

Watchers

Acala has no data, while BNB Chain has 1,680 watchers

Acala logo
BNB Chain logo
1,680

Data from Chainspect

Acala vs BNB Chain Financials New

Chain Revenue

Acala has no data, while BNB Chain chain revenue is $642.3K

Acala logo
BNB Chain logo
$642.3K

Data from Chainspect

Average Transaction Fee

Acala has no data, while BNB Chain average transaction fee is $0.03639

Acala logo
BNB Chain logo
$0.03639

Data from Chainspect

Price

Acala has no data, while BNB Chain price is $1,094

Acala logo
BNB Chain logo
$1,094

Data from Chainspect

Market Cap

Acala has no data, while BNB Chain market cap is $150.7B

Acala logo
BNB Chain logo
$150.7B

Data from Chainspect

Other Comparisons

About Blockchains

About Acala

Acala is the all-in-one DeFi hub of Polkadot. Acala is an Ethereum-compatible platform for financial applications to use smart contracts or built-in protocols with out-of-the-box cross-chain capabilities and robust security.

About BNB Chain

The BNB Chain, formerly known as Binance Smart Chain (BSC), is a blockchain platform introduced by the cryptocurrency exchange Binance. Its native token, BNB, serves various roles within the ecosystem. BNB acts as the network's transaction fuel, similar to gas on Ethereum, and grants users governance rights to participate in on-chain decision-making. In September 2020, Binance introduced the BNB Smart Chain alongside the BNB Beacon Chain, extending BNB's functionality. The BNB Smart Chain supports smart contracts and staking, offering an Ethereum Virtual Machine (EVM)-compatible infrastructure. This dual-chain design aims to provide a high-performance, cost-effective environment for the blockchain community, ensuring compatibility with existing Ethereum tools and dApps while improving scalability and user experience.

Blockchains Socials

Acala Socials

BNB Chain Socials