ZKsync vs Arbitrum Scalability
Real-time TPS
ZKsync has no data, while Arbitrum TPS is 31.59 tx/s
Max TPS (100 blocks)
ZKsync has no data, while Arbitrum max TPS is 1,358 tx/s
Max Theoretical TPS
ZKsync has no data, while Arbitrum max theoretical TPS is 40,000 tx/s
Transaction Volume
ZKsync has no data, while Arbitrum transaction volume is 113,718 txns
Block Time
ZKsync has no data, while Arbitrum block time is 0.25s
Finality
ZKsync has no data, while Arbitrum finality is 13m 48s
Type
ZKsync has no data, while Arbitrum is a layer 2 blockchain
Launch Date
ZKsync has no data, while Arbitrum was launched on Aug 31, 2021
ZKsync vs Arbitrum Decentralization New
Nakamoto Coefficient
ZKsync has no data, while Arbitrum Nakamoto Coefficient is 1
Validators/Miners
ZKsync has no data, while Arbitrum has 1 validators
Stake/Hashrate
ZKsync and Arbitrum have no data
Consensus Mechanism
ZKsync has no data, while Arbitrum is Rollup (Optimistic)
Governance
ZKsync has no data, while Arbitrum governance is on-chain
Other Comparisons
ZKsync Comparisons
About Blockchains
About ZKsync
ZKsync is a Layer-2 scaling solution that makes transactions on Ethereum cheaper and faster by utilizing zero-knowledge rollups (zk-rollups) and zero-knowledge proofs (ZKPs).
About Arbitrum
Arbitrum serves as a Layer 2 scaling solution for Ethereum, leveraging rollups to significantly boost scalability and reduce transaction costs while maintaining robust security. It enables developers to execute EVM-compatible smart contracts with a substantially higher transaction throughput and lower fees compared to Ethereum's main chain, making it a compelling platform for decentralized application development.