Compare ZKsync vs Arbitrum
Open in ChatGPTZKsync vs Arbitrum Scalability
Real-time TPS (1H)
ZKsync has no data, while Arbitrum TPS is 19.83 tx/s
Data from Chainspect
Max TPS (100 blocks)
ZKsync has no data, while Arbitrum max TPS is 2,036 tx/s
Data from Chainspect
Max Theoretical TPS
ZKsync has no data, while Arbitrum max theoretical TPS is 6,095 tx/s
Data from Chainspect
Transaction Volume (1H)
ZKsync has no data, while Arbitrum transaction volume is 71.4K txns
Data from Chainspect
Block Time (1H)
ZKsync has no data, while Arbitrum block time is 0.25s
Data from Chainspect
Finality
ZKsync has no data, while Arbitrum finality is 13m 48s
Data from Chainspect
Type
ZKsync has no data, while Arbitrum is a layer 2 blockchain
Data from Chainspect
Total Transactions (All time)
ZKsync has no data, while Arbitrum has 2.11B total transactions
Data from Chainspect
Launch Date
ZKsync has no data, while Arbitrum was launched on Aug 31, 2021
Data from Chainspect
ZKsync vs Arbitrum Decentralization
Nakamoto Coefficient
ZKsync has no data, while Arbitrum Nakamoto Coefficient is 1
Data from Chainspect
Validators/Miners
ZKsync has no data, while Arbitrum has 1 validators
Data from Chainspect
Stake/Hashrate
ZKsync and Arbitrum have no data
Data from Chainspect
Consensus Mechanism
ZKsync has no data, while Arbitrum is Rollup (Optimistic)
Data from Chainspect
Governance
ZKsync has no data, while Arbitrum governance is on-chain
Data from Chainspect
ZKsync vs Arbitrum Developer Activity
Developers
ZKsync has no data, while Arbitrum has 2,453 developers
Data from Chainspect
Commits
ZKsync has no data, while Arbitrum has 197,145 commits
Data from Chainspect
Repos
ZKsync has no data, while Arbitrum has 135 repos
Data from Chainspect
Stars
ZKsync has no data, while Arbitrum has 10,769 stars
Data from Chainspect
Watchers
ZKsync has no data, while Arbitrum has 1,591 watchers
Data from Chainspect
ZKsync vs Arbitrum Financials New
Chain Revenue
ZKsync has no data, while Arbitrum chain revenue is $11.48K
Data from Chainspect
Average Transaction Fee
ZKsync has no data, while Arbitrum average transaction fee is $0.007411
Data from Chainspect
Market Cap
ZKsync has no data, while Arbitrum market cap is $709.8M
Data from Chainspect
FDV
ZKsync has no data, while Arbitrum FDV is $1.175B
Data from Chainspect
Market Cap / FDV
ZKsync has no data, while Arbitrum Market Cap to FDV ratio is 60.41%
Data from Chainspect
Price
ZKsync has no data, while Arbitrum price is $0.1175
Data from Chainspect
Other Comparisons
ZKsync Comparisons
About Blockchains
About ZKsync
ZKsync is a Layer-2 scaling solution that makes transactions on Ethereum cheaper and faster by utilizing zero-knowledge rollups (zk-rollups) and zero-knowledge proofs (ZKPs).
About Arbitrum
Arbitrum serves as a Layer 2 scaling solution for Ethereum, leveraging rollups to significantly boost scalability and reduce transaction costs while maintaining robust security. It enables developers to execute EVM-compatible smart contracts with a substantially higher transaction throughput and lower fees compared to Ethereum's main chain, making it a compelling platform for decentralized application development.